Heisy Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 Yes, the extended snowfall looks like a result from the better phasing down south. THis is allowed for more expansive CCB snows. For a good example of this check out the hour by hour RGEM snowfall maps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2O Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 Hey, Cobalt. Slow your roll. I know you are excited but breathe a little in between posts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTRWx's Thanks Giving Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 The 18Z GFS looks like a slight overall improvement for us, but the low placement wobbles quite a bit as it blossoms over the Gulf Stream! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heisy Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 I know we're in storm mode so I hope i don't get in trouble for this... The old saying that "models won't help us this close" or "modes lose skill the closer to an event" is blasphemy. Think chaos theory or the butterfly effect. Models work the same way to an extent. The more incorrect a model is early on, the more incorrect it will be farther out. This in turn means the closer to an event, or hour 0/6 the better a model should get. Looking at the models up to the last viable run is a good way to catch last second trends. The old adage that models lose their skill the closer to the storm we get is just BS. If they did it wouldn't make sense since they would just be worst the farther out in time they went. ----- I hope we continue to see a trend in more phasing and increased neg tilt in the 00z runs tonight. Then it is "nowcast time" as the event will be on top of us. Though i guess the 6z runs could sneak in there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTRWx's Thanks Giving Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 A couple more trends towards the slightly higher qpf to our sw would be interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wonderdog Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 Nice squeeze play between the dreaded se ridge and the GL system 3 minutes ago, BTRWx's Thanks Giving said: A couple more trends towards the slightly higher qpf to our sw would be interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mdhokie Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 Doug Kamememememer on ch4 is going with 1-3 for the I95 corridor. Seems low even considering NWS products. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BristowWx Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 Just now, mdhokie said: Doug Kamememememer on ch4 is going with 1-3 for the I95 corridor. Seems low even considering NWS products. Good safe call. Can always go higher without much fuss but going max and heading down makes a worse showing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTRWx's Thanks Giving Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 3 minutes ago, mdhokie said: Doug Kamememememer on ch4 is going with 1-3 for the I95 corridor. Seems low even considering NWS products. He's watching! #jinx eta: from his Facebook Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhineasC Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 Are the models keying on to the storm drying a bit over our area as the coastal strengthens? I have noticed that every run today has shown a further west precipitation shield but actually some drying over the DCA/BWI area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, PhineasC said: Are the models keying on to the storm drying a bit over our area as the coastal strengthens? I have noticed that every run today has shown a further west precipitation shield but actually some drying over the DCA/BWI area. I only saw that on the 18z GFS... I don't think it was there on the NAMs or the RGEM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhineasC Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 Just now, yoda said: I only saw that on the 18z GFS... I don't think it was there on the NAMs or the RGEM I didn't look closely at them. I did see it at 12z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmcwahoo Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 From Wakefield, quite the positive forecast discussion for those of us in the Richmond metro area: All signs are now pointing to mainly snow generally west of a South Hill to Richmond to Salisbury MD line tonight, as even the GFS which is now the warmest model keeps the entire column below freezing in these areas. Just on the cold side of the rain/snow line, there will likely be a moderate to locally heavy snow where is is juxtapositioned with the best upper f-gen forcing and associated banding features. As such, have opted to go with a winter storm warning for Dorchester/Wicomico County, southwest to Caroline, and then through the western RIC metro and SW to Mecklenburg County. Could see 6 inches of snow in this area, although the evening shift will need to watch for how long this heavier snow burst lasts tonight which may inflate totals even more. Additional snow expected into Saturday with the deformation axis associated with the upper trough moving overhead. The snow should diminish west to east Saturday aftn into evening. Overall, will go with storm totals of 4 to 6 inches in the warning area with locally higher amounts especially in the MD. Since the snow started even earlier than anticipated, it would not shock me to see 7 inch amounts in a narrow corridor west of RIC as well. In the advy areas, will go with 2 to 4 inches, although the eastern advy may see some lesser amts due to more rain mixing in. The rain/snow line may actually shift westward a little bit as the low develops along the coast as the upper short wave approaches. Do not think this will be of huge consequence to snow totals in the warning area, but none the less it should be noted it could lower totals slightly on the eastern side of RIC into the Tri Cities. Thus, the reason this area stays in the winter weather advy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AfewUniversesBelowNormal Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 21 minutes ago, Wonderdog said: Nice squeeze play between the dreaded se ridge and the GL system future runs are probably based around a precip increase centered around philadelphia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobalt Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 13 minutes ago, rmcwahoo said: From Wakefield, quite the positive forecast discussion for those of us in the Richmond metro area: All signs are now pointing to mainly snow generally west of a South Hill to Richmond to Salisbury MD line tonight, as even the GFS which is now the warmest model keeps the entire column below freezing in these areas. Just on the cold side of the rain/snow line, there will likely be a moderate to locally heavy snow where is is juxtapositioned with the best upper f-gen forcing and associated banding features. As such, have opted to go with a winter storm warning for Dorchester/Wicomico County, southwest to Caroline, and then through the western RIC metro and SW to Mecklenburg County. Could see 6 inches of snow in this area, although the evening shift will need to watch for how long this heavier snow burst lasts tonight which may inflate totals even more. Additional snow expected into Saturday with the deformation axis associated with the upper trough moving overhead. The snow should diminish west to east Saturday aftn into evening. Overall, will go with storm totals of 4 to 6 inches in the warning area with locally higher amounts especially in the MD. Since the snow started even earlier than anticipated, it would not shock me to see 7 inch amounts in a narrow corridor west of RIC as well. In the advy areas, will go with 2 to 4 inches, although the eastern advy may see some lesser amts due to more rain mixing in. The rain/snow line may actually shift westward a little bit as the low develops along the coast as the upper short wave approaches. Do not think this will be of huge consequence to snow totals in the warning area, but none the less it should be noted it could lower totals slightly on the eastern side of RIC into the Tri Cities. Thus, the reason this area stays in the winter weather advy. Positive for us in the DC area too. rain/snow line shifting westward must mean the low is stronger or the storm will be further West Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ErinInTheSky Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 HRRRrrrrr shows that radar isn't expected to fill in for at least another 5 hours. https://i.imgur.com/EwSCwZT.mp4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowLover22 Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 I have noticed that the HRRR has been trending west for the last 4 runs or so. Something to monitor going forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PDIII Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 40 minutes ago, H2O said: Hey, Cobalt. Slow your roll. I know you are excited but breathe a little in between posts Woah cheif, who are you? Post police? Calm the freak down and let the man be excited!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobalt Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 Just now, PDIII said: Woah cheif, who are you? Post police? Calm the freak down and let the man be excited!!!! Nah, he's got all the right to tell me to slow my roll. I may not seem new by my post count, but remember that 300 of those posts have come from this week alone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, Philadelphia Snow said: I have noticed that the HRRR has been trending west for the last 4 runs or so. Something to monitor going forward . Hrrr is only accurate to about hour 0 so shifts are to be expected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ErinInTheSky Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 Just now, psuhoffman said: Hrrr is only accurate to about hour 0 so shifts are to be expected. I kind of laughed after I posted it... but.... I believe in giving every model a chance at the beginning of the year! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beachin Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 Absolutely raging snow in princess Anne roads are covered 30 degrees Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 1 minute ago, supernovasky said: I kind of laughed after I posted it... but.... I believe in giving every model a chance at the beginning of the year! It's a tool. And every now and then a useful one. But in seriousness it can be of some value in short range picking up on some banding. It did on with picking up where the heaviest bands would set up during the second half of the 2016 storm. It nailed the clipper in early January up here last year. But it seems to lose accuracy fast past 6 hours or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beachin Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2O Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 4 minutes ago, PDIII said: Woah cheif, who are you? Post police? Calm the freak down and let the man be excited!!!! Friendly advice. I know what I’m doing, you don’t. I never said said he couldn’t be excited. Just temper that excitement while posting and I am the post police. You need a refresher? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BristowWx Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, Beachin said: Good pic. That's what we are all waiting for. Agony waiting so many more hours when it's doing that so close by but booze helps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAPE Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 Cambridge MD should do very well. Could see 10" there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Z-Cast Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 Is it me or does the weather.us snow algorithm seem too bullish? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobalt Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 3 minutes ago, Z-Cast said: Is it me or does the weather.us snow algorithm seem too bullish? That 4" of snow could occur outside of DC, but not near DC. Kuchera seems the most accurate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BristowWx Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, Z-Cast said: Is it me or does the weather.us snow algorithm seem too bullish? I always go with the low end of the range and subtract an inch. That would give me 3. I think that is possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.