Damage In Tolland Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 4 minutes ago, Wentzadelphia said: FWIW the 21z SREF made a nice shift W. Really hittin' those CCB snows. Somewhere someone said there wouldn’t be a ccb or deform Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ericjcrash Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 16 minutes ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said: Yea but there’s a difference between his call for historic 4” of snow based off nam weenie maps compared to what actually hapenned, flakes in the air. Deff overperformed in many areas of the south though. Ok, had to go just a bit NE for historic 6" snows sorry. Snow accumulated on the beach in Galveston too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxBlue Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 32 minutes ago, WinterWolf said: Wow did the Deep South, and I mean Deep South get pounded...Record breaking snows for them in lots of areas. And I remember, somebody on here saying it might snow in New Orleans with this(and it was hard to believe)..and it did...nice call! That’s something. Richmond VA in for possible double digit snows...this thing is juiced. Overachiever big time down there. Impressive. Already mentioned earlier in the thread, but Asheville is up to 8-11" with a whole night of light/moderate snow left. NWS GSP called for 1-2" the day before the event started. Not often you see a short-term forecast bust that epic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted December 9, 2017 Author Share Posted December 9, 2017 00z NAM cut back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 Wow that is epic. Unbelievable down there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 Just now, Baroclinic Zone said: 00z NAM cut back Bi polar NAM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 Take the biggest nam run and the smallest, split it down the middle....you have your forecast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxBlue Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 Still juicer than 12z NAM. It's probably time to start looking at short-range models and nowcast the event anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
centralmass Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 41 minutes ago, Wentzadelphia said: FWIW the 21z SREF made a nice shift W. Really hittin' those CCB snows. good place to look at the trends of today's run and how it converged at 21z: http://www.spc.noaa.gov/exper/sref/srefplumes/?SID=FIT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 1 minute ago, WxBlue said: Still juicer than 12z NAM. It's probably time to start looking at short-range models and nowcast the event anyway. Yea, it shaved .1 qpf or something noise worthy. It’s all about nowcasting but every reliable guidance has remain pretty steadfast on amounts so I won’t be watching this like a hawk tonight. Wake in the morning and fully expect my 3-6”. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 Oof... the NAM cut way back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 2 minutes ago, CT Rain said: Oof... the NAM cut way back Tough night for you incoming, may have to adjust ‘way’ down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveSN+ Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 12 km NAM looks only slightly lower, but the 3 km NAM is much lower. Would toss the 3 km in the trash though, as it has a terrible convective feedback signal this run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 Just now, LoveSN+ said: 12 km NAM looks only slightly lower, but the 3 km NAM is much lower. Would toss the 3 km in the trash though, as it has a terrible convective feedback signal this run. I always forget looking at the 3k version. Now I see why CT chief weenie met is worried. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
78Blizzard Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 31 minutes ago, Baroclinic Zone said: 00z NAM cut back 3 km NAM did the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 5 minutes ago, LoveSN+ said: 12 km NAM looks only slightly lower, but the 3 km NAM is much lower. Would toss the 3 km in the trash though, as it has a terrible convective feedback signal this run. Looks fine to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
codfishsnowman Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 seriously I am not seeing the kind of radar presentation that shows a great sign of a nnw bend back , i am convinced of a good event eastern zones but I don't know about back to the west....i see a lot of splotchiness in the precip shield Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
codfishsnowman Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 1 minute ago, CT Rain said: Looks fine to me your worry has merit...this could easily be a 1 to 3 or 4 baking powder disjointed mess for many places w of the river... long duration wintry appeal, enough to gum up the roads etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 Those of you who are around Albany New York, Northwest / Western Massachusetts were always on the northwest / western fringe for snow. You will see snow, don't worry completely yet. However, though looking at a colder situation with less precipitation isn't all that bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 1 minute ago, codfishsnowman said: your worry has merit...this could easily be a 1 to 3 or 4 baking powder disjointed mess for many places w of the river... long duration wintry appeal, enough to gum up the roads etc It's just the NAM. Not too worried yet. But definitely not a great start to 00z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveSN+ Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 5 minutes ago, CT Rain said: Looks fine to me Develops a low over New York. Looks goofy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 Just now, LoveSN+ said: Develops a low over New York. Looks goofy Doing some crazy gravity wave stuff. It did that at 18z too. No reason to toss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 2 minutes ago, codfishsnowman said: seriously I am not seeing the kind of radar presentation that shows a great sign of a nnw bend back , i am convinced of a good event eastern zones but I don't know about back to the west....i see a lot of splotchiness in the precip shield It should develop pretty rapidly early tomorrow. That said, there's def a question of how heavy the precip is to the west...I still think it will be at least solid advisory back in the river valley but there's always a chance that the best midlevel moisture has trouble getting back there and you end up with weaker bands that struggle to give more than 0.03 or 0.04 of LE per hour at the peak....and you end up with a paltry event. This was never expected to have big rates...more of a drawn out storm...but you'd still want to see at least a couple hours in the 0.07-0.08 per hour range. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
codfishsnowman Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 1 minute ago, ORH_wxman said: It should develop pretty rapidly early tomorrow. That said, there's def a question of how heavy the precip is to the west...I still think it will be at least solid advisory back in the river valley but there's always a chance that the best midlevel moisture has trouble getting back there and you end up with weaker bands that struggle to give more than 0.03 or 0.04 of LE per hour at the peak....and you end up with a paltry event. This was never expected to have big rates...more of a drawn out storm...but you'd still want to see at least a couple hours in the 0.07-0.08 per hour range. i have been going through the thread for the southeast and there is a lot of "showery" obs...ptype issues due to non sustained heavier rates etc....the area of really good goods is kida narrow and i think TT mentioned that earlier Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajisai Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 does the fact that the models have seemed to forecast lower than observed for the south (from TX to MD) have any bearing on what might happen up here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdxken Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 1 hour ago, WinterWolf said: Wow did the Deep South, and I mean Deep South get pounded...Record breaking snows for them in lots of areas. And I remember, somebody on here saying it might snow in New Orleans with this(and it was hard to believe)..and it did...nice call! That’s something. Richmond VA in for possible double digit snows...this thing is juiced. Overachiever big time down there. Impressive. Ginxy I believe . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 3 minutes ago, codfishsnowman said: i have been going through the thread for the southeast and there is a lot of "showery" obs...ptype issues due to non sustained heavier rates etc....the area of really good goods is kida narrow and i think TT mentioned that earlier We have always been the W edge of anything good out here. You should still be good for 3-5" but as you alluded to, always beware the baking powder back here in this set-up. 2-3" totals are certainly very possible for everyone W of the CT River if the dynamics are less than advertised. Still better than bare ground. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 7 minutes ago, ajisai said: does the fact that the models have seemed to forecast lower than observed for the south (from TX to MD) have any bearing on what might happen up here? Maybe, But this could also be the fact that the temps are a little colder down there than progged so that translates into a better ratio. This means lesser precipitation will get decent snows even for areas down south. Any elevation will enhance that as you know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 8 minutes ago, ajisai said: does the fact that the models have seemed to forecast lower than observed for the south (from TX to MD) have any bearing on what might happen up here? I don't think so. This was a first piece of energy sliding off the coast. We are going to get a second piece that rapidly forms tomorrow morning. Second, the areas that over achieved seemed to be more in the deform area from what i can tell. So, that will happen in a marginal environment. Not sure that means it was an overall bust? What may have occurred is the classic model bias of being a hair too warm with heavy rates and great snow production. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahk_webstah Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 Wouldn't we see the expansion in the precip field happen after the arctic shortwave gets closer? In other words not yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.