CoastalWx Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 6 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said: Noyes says only 1-3 Boston with wind off the water . Seems off Maybe I am wrong, but I think mets are getting swayed by snow maps and srfc Ts. I do think SE of BOS more down into PYM county has issues on the water. It's a close call here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 8 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said: Noyes says only 1-3 Boston with wind off the water . Seems off He usually is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 1 minute ago, CoastalWx said: Maybe I am wrong, but I think mets are getting swayed by snow maps and srfc Ts. I do think SE of BOS more down into PYM county has issues on the water. It's a close call here. Snow maps have been a detriment to social media mets. Thought ‘true’ mets don’t even factor them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 1 hour ago, powderfreak said: Snowing on the Gulf Coast this morning... HOU is M1 -SN. KHOU 081053Z 35011KT 2SM -SN BR SCT008 BKN014 OVC021 M01/M01 A3027 RMK AO2 SLP255 P0000 T10061006 Even Galveston, TX at elevation 7 feet on the Gulf of Mexico has been snowing for the past 4 hours. Brownsville, but winner Corpus Christie with TSSN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 Not be a debbie-d but ...there is still time for this to work out less .. some snow is 100% ... those gaudy numbers? Mmm. Those are uncertain in my mind, and i mean that relative to 48 hours lead/standarization, too. I just don't like the Euro being inside it's wheel-house, where there is such a strident claim for success rates? that's a ... b, that compression/velocity saturation issue of the general synoptic picture is still an offset/mitigation to S/W mechanical power that's in play, whether these other guidance sources have found the mechanical reasons to offset that the other direction or not ... Not here to say which is right or wrong, just that I'm leery of this whole thing ... I think advisory is fine, and if the Euro corrects a couple of tenths up in today's 12z shenanigans then I'd consider more... I suppose that backs one into a plausible assumption that without so much of that velocity robbing away from S/W jet maxes, this particular system would have done more ...? or at least, we would be talking higher totals and so forth with a bit more confidence. perhaps. in what should be an unrelated matter (eh hm...), i personally would be happy with a 2" of holiday confetti. just some to sparkle the cheeks of the angels to let us know that they still care. for that ...i feel confident close to 100% that we'll satisfy some Christmas appeal.. It's always nicer to have that between T-Giving and such .. you know? right in there planning and shopping and cooking and life's affairs... and the smell of pine in one's living room if executing a hapless life form for three weeks of vapid symbolism is your game... anyway, we'll probably have to deal with at least some of these types of larger scale versus S/W limitation headaches next week on that guy too, as the baser circulation issues will very likely still be in place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 7 minutes ago, CoastalWx said: Maybe I am wrong, but I think mets are getting swayed by snow maps and srfc Ts. I do think SE of BOS more down into PYM county has issues on the water. It's a close call here. There must be a smarter way to do the rn/sn algorithm. Maybe anything with -2C H95 Tw’s are snow even if 2m is 34F. Models sometimes love to show those relatively cold 950s with that jump to +3C at the sfc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, dendrite said: There must be a smarter way to do the rn/sn algorithm. Maybe anything with -2C H95 Tw’s are snow even if 2m is 34F. Models sometimes love to show those relatively cold 950s with that jump to +3C at the sfc. Living on the coast, I have always been surprised on both sides. Thinking rain would happen..and then it stays snow...or vice versa. One thing I have noticed is that when you have that dry adiabatic look from the srfc to say 950 or 925...and it's precipitating...the model srfc Ts will always be too warm. Usually what happens is that you wetbulb down enough..or at least make the column a little more uniform and moist adiabatic. In your example, it would turn a model srfc T of 34-35 more like 32 or 31 if it's cold just off the deck. But, if you have that whole column warming to like -1C from 950-925 and it's modeled to be 35 with NE winds off the water..it very well could be a mix or even rain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bostonseminole Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 WC name: #Benji.... really how do they get these names... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klw Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 17 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said: Brownsville, but winner Corpus Christie with TSSN Houston traffic webcams show a light covering in spots. http://traffic.houstontranstar.org/cctv/transtar/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 9 minutes ago, CoastalWx said: Living on the coast, I have always been surprised on both sides. Thinking rain would happen..and then it stays snow...or vice versa. One thing I have noticed is that when you have that dry adiabatic look from the srfc to say 950 or 925...and it's precipitating...the model srfc Ts will always be too warm. Usually what happens is that you wetbulb down enough..or at least make the column a little more uniform and moist adiabatic. In your example, it would turn a model srfc T of 34-35 more like 32 or 31 if it's cold just off the deck. But, if you have that whole column warming to like -1C from 950-925 and it's modeled to be 35 with NE winds off the water..it very well could be a mix or even rain. Yeah. Base it off of wetbulbs rather than the temps themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted December 8, 2017 Author Share Posted December 8, 2017 1 hour ago, CoastalWx said: Right? Big switch there. The NAM is sort of how I see this working out in terms of what makes sense. I also wonder why some guidance almost warms a tick or too across the area as winds become more N-NNW. Must be the time of year. You most certainly are not warming near the coast when winds back like that. I was think that precipitation rates may be messing with the low level thermal profile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 7 minutes ago, Baroclinic Zone said: I was think that precipitation rates may be messing with the low level thermal profile. I mean if it lightens up, that will cause a degree or so of warmth there. That's possible too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 24 minutes ago, dendrite said: Yeah. Base it off of wetbulbs rather than the temps themselves. That's what I do when trying to figure things out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 I think 1-3 in SE Mass is probably low based on what I’ve seen. Maybe I’m wrong... but some on air Mets talking about a rain snow line well west of the canal. I just don’t see it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 Basing precip off wet bulb would be strictly done off soundings, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 What I have been watching is the QPF increase North and East in the RIC Delaware path, each run it increases north and East. Something to watch, GFS picked up on that at Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 1 minute ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said: Basing precip off wet bulb would be strictly done off soundings, right? Or dewpoint because saturation occurs so DPs equal wetbulb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 Looks like 12z NAM may come in a hair flatter than 6z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 4 minutes ago, CoastalWx said: Looks like 12z NAM may come in a hair flatter than 6z. Less dynamics Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 Just now, Ginx snewx said: Less dynamics Not quite as potent with nrn stream. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 1 minute ago, CoastalWx said: Not quite as potent with nrn stream. Won't matter much it seems with totals. Seems a 4 to 7 for most is consensus of modeling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 It's is trying to form a decent deform though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneypitmike Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 1 hour ago, Ginx snewx said: Brownsville, but winner Corpus Christie with TSSN I guess we'll be covering the brown grass in any case this weekend in GC. Congrats HubbDave. Given the trace of snow yesterday and the overnight last night, I'll be able to claim "days and days of snow". 28.1* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 Pretty meh on the NAM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 1 minute ago, CT Rain said: Pretty meh on the NAM 4 to 7 looks good, great kick off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted December 8, 2017 Author Share Posted December 8, 2017 Nice thump for the I-95 corridor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 1 minute ago, moneypitmike said: I guess we'll be covering the brown grass in any case this weekend in GC. Congrats HubbDave. Given the trace of snow yesterday and the overnight last night, I'll be able to claim "days and days of snow". 28.1* OT but I noticed the trace of snow on the cars this morning and was surprised. In the early morning light I first said to myself "that's the heaviest frost I've ever seen". We look pretty locked for 2-4" out here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The 4 Seasons Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 Hello everyone. Just wanted to put my fx out there. I've seen some maps with a few gradients across CT, I don't really see a need with this storm. Kept it pretty simple and straight forward, probably on the higher end of most though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxBlue Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 NAM is still a solid event for I-95. Probably a realistic run, IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted December 8, 2017 Author Share Posted December 8, 2017 You can see the NAM cooling the surface temps as the precip commences. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.