MJO812 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 9z SREF is more west compared to 3z 0.25 QPF is over NYC and CNJ and SNJ now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB GFI Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 4 minutes ago, Snow88 said: 9z SREF is more west compared to 3z 0.25 QPF is over NYC and CNJ and SNJ now. .5 to Brick NJ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 Given the pattern, I'm okay with models now showing a miss or a scrape. The trough becoming a little sharper or the ridge slightly stronger would shift at least decent snow back to NYC for a while. I'd almost rather it be a scrape/near miss than be in the bullseye now and sweat the rain/snow line creeping closer. If what happens 72 hours out on modeling always verifies, the early March disaster last year here would've been a 18-24" blizzard on Long Island instead of a couple of inches of slop to rain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redbanknjandbigbasslakepa Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 I’m not hanging my hat on the NAVGEM. This is at best an absolute light coastal flurries/snow showers scraper based on the consensus of model data I’d trust. The weekend looks mainly dry and cool. We’ll get our snow but not this weekend. Next best shot around the 17-19th. Ride the hot hand guys. I’ve been hot early, calling for the cold December six weeks ago and seeing the progressive miss east this weekend. I’ll have more to follow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherlogix Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 2 hours ago, Snow88 said: Navgem , Ukie , JMA and some gefs members. Murderers Row; just like Combs, Koenig, Ruth, Gehrig, Meusel and Lazzeri. La-la-la-la lock-it-up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB GFI Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 5 minutes ago, redbanknjandbigbasslakepa said: I’m not hanging my hat on the NAVGEM. This is at best an absolute light coastal flurries/snow showers scraper based on the consensus of model data I’d trust. The weekend looks mainly dry and cool. We’ll get our snow but not this weekend. Next best shot around the 17-19th. Ride the hot hand guys. I’ve been hit early, calling for the cold December six weeks ago and seeing the progressive miss east this weekend. I’ll have more to follow. You have the hot hand ? You were plus 4 for November the city and surrounding airports were - 1. Every model gives you an inch or two , not just the NAV Hold off on knowing what this is until tomorrow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlsterCountySnowZ Posted December 6, 2017 Author Share Posted December 6, 2017 1 hour ago, Rtd208 said: My ignore user list keeps growing. Go figure. Yay I made the cut if I’m seeing this lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redbanknjandbigbasslakepa Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 I had the cold early November and warm late. The cold early for the week overwhelmed the monthly departure. I drilled the cold December in October. Paul you’ll get your snow but this weekend is a strung out progressive front basically. No deepening and nothing to bring it north. Slides off the coast with nary a flake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BxEngine Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 The model thread is to discuss the various models and to keep the 84 nam and such from crapping up the actual discussion threads. If you want to discuss the upcoming pattern and your thoughts on how it will progress, by all means, please do it. Just not in here where the discussion is meant to be about the various models and what they show. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 1 minute ago, redbanknjandbigbasslakepa said: I had the cold early November and warm late. The cold early for the week overwhelmed the monthly departure. I drilled the cold December in October. Paul you’ll get your snow but this weekend is a strung out progressive front basically. No deepening and nothing to bring it north. Slides off the coast with nary a flake. Phase with the northern low ? STJ ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 Precip is further west at hour 57 compared to past runs This looks really good on the Nam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeatherFeen2000 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 1 hour ago, jm1220 said: Given the pattern, I'm okay with models now showing a miss or a scrape. The trough becoming a little sharper or the ridge slightly stronger would shift at least decent snow back to NYC for a while. I'd almost rather it be a scrape/near miss than be in the bullseye now and sweat the rain/snow line creeping closer. If what happens 72 hours out on modeling always verifies, the early March disaster last year here would've been a 18-24" blizzard on Long Island instead of a couple of inches of slop to rain. John, I don' think we should be worrying about rain for this weekend' system. It`s either a miss or some snow. I don't think we get any rain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlsterCountySnowZ Posted December 6, 2017 Author Share Posted December 6, 2017 Nams great for coast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 Nam with a huge shift west https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=nam®ion=us&pkg=mslp_pcpn_frzn&runtime=2017120612&fh=0&xpos=0&ypos=0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB GFI Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 Careful with , this is over posts The models are now sticking this on the Arctic front. Nothing is set , I would wait 24 hours before riding any " hot hands ". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJwx85 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 Not sure if anyone has already posted this but the 06z RGEM was pretty far West and cold for the Friday night into Saturday potential event. 12z is running as we speak. In any event, we have two main things working against us, the first being a positively tilted trough and the second being that the energy involved in forcing the surface low is actually weakening by the time it reaches us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJwx85 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 6 minutes ago, UlsterCountySnowZ said: Nams great for coast Define great? Also the NAM is historically too far West at 84 hours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlsterCountySnowZ Posted December 6, 2017 Author Share Posted December 6, 2017 2 minutes ago, NJwx85 said: Define great? Also the NAM is historically too far West at 84 hours. Great in comparison to nothing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 2 minutes ago, NJwx85 said: Define great? Also the NAM is historically too far West at 84 hours. A few inches is great for this time of the year. The precip is still coming up after 84 hours. Mid Atlantic get several inches of snow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJwx85 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 Just now, Snow88 said: A few inches is great for this time of the year. The precip is still coming up after 84 hours. Mid Atlantic get several inches of snow Don't you know better by now than to try and extrapolate the NAM? Wake me up when the GFS or Euro show anything even remotely close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Wiggum Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 31 minutes ago, redbanknjandbigbasslakepa said: ... this weekend is a strung out progressive front basically. No deepening and nothing to bring it north. Slides off the coast with nary a flake. You may end up being correct, not arguing your opinion at all. I will however debate your use of the term progressive. I am only using this image since it is what happens to be open on my browser (tho there is other guidance supporting it). This is NOT a progressive look at all. A little displaced with the mean trof location? Sure. But nowhere even close to being a progressive look: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 1 minute ago, NJwx85 said: Don't you know better by now than to try and extrapolate the NAM? Wake me up when the GFS or Euro show anything even remotely close. They were close Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 A couple of ways this can create a snow event for us- The initial wave Friday is a little stronger and closer to the coast, or there's interaction between the northern stream and the following southern wave on Sunday. The NAM seems to be keying in on the second outcome here. But still many ways this can all change, and it can all still slide out to sea. If there's no interaction between the waves on Sunday, that will be gone out to sea, and the wave Friday can still be too flat/weak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Wiggum Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 2 minutes ago, NJwx85 said: Don't you know better by now than to try and extrapolate the NAM? Wake me up when the GFS or Euro show anything even remotely close. Actually GFS is rather close at 500mb, surface is still playing catchup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 Just now, Ralph Wiggum said: Actually GFS is rather close at 500mb, surface is still playing catchup. GEFS and EPS were slightly west than the op runs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redbanknjandbigbasslakepa Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 Ralph an 84hr panel of the NAM? Really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJwx85 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 2 minutes ago, Snow88 said: They were close 1 minute ago, Ralph Wiggum said: Actually GFS is rather close at 500mb, surface is still playing catchup. I am not trying to cause an argument but how is this close? You're never going to get a system to come far enough West with a trough axis like this. This is the type of setup where Southern NJ, Eastern LI and the Cape can catch a few inches. For something more meaningful, major changes need to occur. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 1 minute ago, redbanknjandbigbasslakepa said: Ralph an 84hr panel of the NAM? Really? Yes This has happened in the past along arctic fronts where the models don't catch on until a day before the storm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 1 minute ago, NJwx85 said: I am not trying to cause an argument but how is this close? You're never going to get a system to come far enough West with a trough axis like this. This is the type of setup where Southern NJ, Eastern LI and the Cape can catch a few inches. For something more meaningful, major changes need to occur. That's west of 0z run It will all come down to interaction Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlsterCountySnowZ Posted December 6, 2017 Author Share Posted December 6, 2017 Lets not argue about the validity and whether or not a particular model is correct... this threads for discussing any and all... long range of short, right or wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.