Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,909
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    WichitaChiefSam
    Newest Member
    WichitaChiefSam
    Joined

Mid to Long Term Discussion 2018


Cary_Snow95

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 1/26/2018 at 11:09 PM, mackerel_sky said:

18z GFS really is loaded! Like 4 or 5 possible storms that could end up producing! 

Expand  

Just looked at H5 and it looks like a weak wave entering Southern California produces this result at 384. The Webber Wave? I'll believe it when I see it. I don't think the NS will let something like that happen this winter but we'll see

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/27/2018 at 12:23 AM, NorthernUpstateSC said:
Expand  

It's rare to see Mike Ventrice give a forecast like that on a public forum. His thoughts match up with what we've been saying on here, increased chances for cold intrusions from mid Feb into early March

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/27/2018 at 3:31 AM, griteater said:

It's rare to see Mike Ventrice give a forecast like that on a public forum. His thoughts match up with what we've been saying on here, increased chances for cold intrusions from mid Feb into early March

Expand  

We don't need intrusions, we need embedded like a tick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/27/2018 at 12:33 PM, Orangeburgwx said:

6z GFS took all of us to Heartbreak Hotel... torch

Expand  

It looked ok to me. Keeps cold air in NA and keep the potential of storms. Also has a fantasy major ice storm for many CAD areas starting at day 12. Then at day 16 still shows cold air to our NW with chances of movement SE.

Fantasy ice storm:

 

pppp.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/27/2018 at 1:39 PM, Cold Rain said:

Lol the 6z GFS is not a torch.

Expand  

Yeah lots of crazy in this thread lately....people need to let the pattern change happen...models are most likely pretty wrong in the 7+ day range if there is a major pattern change back to cold coming, they just don't do well with locking in on them until it actually happens....so if there is going to be another substantial cold outbreak it wont be evident until mid week or later.....but hey lets take the long range GFS to heart cause its always right :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/27/2018 at 1:54 PM, downeastnc said:

Yeah lots of crazy in this thread lately....people need to let the pattern change happen...models are most likely pretty wrong in the 7+ day range if there is a major pattern change back to cold coming, they just don't do well with locking in on them until it actually happens....so if there is going to be another substantial cold outbreak it wont be evident until mid week or later.....but hey lets take the long range GFS to heart cause its always right :rolleyes:

Expand  

Yeah agreed.  But even if you take the LR 6z verbatim, it’s still not a torch.  I don’t know for sure if the 10-15 day period will be warm or cold (although I’d lean cold), but it’s not being shown as a torch.  I don’t know what maps people are looking at.  My guess is that we see the blue and purple colors mostly to the north and west, with greens or yellows near us and assume that means warm.  That isn’t the best way to interpret those maps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/27/2018 at 2:02 PM, Cold Rain said:

Yeah agreed.  But even if you take the LR 6z verbatim, it’s still not a torch.  I don’t know for sure if the 10-15 day period will be warm or cold (although I’d lean cold), but it’s not being shown as a torch.  I don’t know what maps people are looking at.  My guess is that we see the blue and purple colors mostly to the north and west, with greens or yellows near us and assume that means warm.  That isn’t the best way to interpret those maps.

Expand  

Exactly.  It’s defin not a torch,  and the respected forecasters have been saying it was going to be a battle ground as the cold pushed from the plains east toward mid February.

Everything looks that way with indices so far. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/27/2018 at 2:02 PM, Cold Rain said:

Yeah agreed.  But even if you take the LR 6z verbatim, it’s still not a torch.  I don’t know for sure if the 10-15 day period will be warm or cold (although I’d lean cold), but it’s not being shown as a torch.  I don’t know what maps people are looking at.  My guess is that we see the blue and purple colors mostly to the north and west, with greens or yellows near us and assume that means warm.  That isn’t the best way to interpret those maps.

Expand  

It could just as easily stay warm through the end of February, or atleast normal temps. Just because all the cold is loaded in Canada, doesn't mean it has to hit the SE, the indicies have been wrong before

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/27/2018 at 2:14 PM, mackerel_sky said:

It could just as easily stay warm through the end of February, or atleast normal temps. Just because all the cold is loaded in Canada, doesn't mean it has to hit the SE, the indicies have been wrong before

Expand  

Yep, it might never get cold again.  That is definitely within the realm of possible outcomes.  Not sure that I would tag it with a high probability marker, but you can’t deny that within the universe of all possible outcomes, eternal warm weather is one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/27/2018 at 2:19 PM, Cold Rain said:

Yep, it might never get cold again.  That is definitely within the realm of possible outcomes.  Not sure that I would tag it with a high probability marker, but you can’t deny that within the universe of all possible outcomes, eternal warm weather is one.

Expand  

especially in our part of the CONUS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/27/2018 at 2:19 PM, Cold Rain said:

Yep, it might never get cold again.  That is definitely within the realm of possible outcomes.  Not sure that I would tag it with a high probability marker, but you can’t deny that within the universe of all possible outcomes, eternal warm weather is one.

Expand  

Carl Parker (TWC) said this shot won't make it to the SE! Highs in 50s South of KY through the 17th! :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This might be a good set up for a major Ice Storm? JB thinks the cold will push east, IDK? Going to be interesting. Probably the most likely outcome will be a lot of snow/Ice west of the mountains at least to begin with. May take the middle or end of February for the cold makes it to the SE. I’m betting a lot of us sees an Ice Storm before the 20th. We don’t live at 5k feet, So I think models may miss seeing low level cold air in the LR!! JMO

JB does say a war sets up from Texas to NE. So we may just stay warm like CR said.




IMG]https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180127/454cbd63fa6f1e1a6b13c8e4153ebd6e.jpg[/img]


.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hazardous Weather Outlook

Hazardous Weather Outlook
National Weather Service Raleigh NC
314 AM EST Sat Jan 27 2018

NCZ007>011-024>028-041>043-078-281030-
Person-Granville-Vance-Warren-Halifax-Orange-Durham-Franklin-Nash-
Edgecombe-Wake-Johnston-Wilson-Wayne-
314 AM EST Sat Jan 27 2018

This Hazardous Weather Outlook is for central North Carolina.

.DAY ONE...Today and Tonight.

Hazardous weather is not expected at this time.

.DAYS TWO THROUGH SEVEN...Sunday through Friday.

There is a slight chance of wintry weather late Monday night into
Tuesday morning from the Triangle area to the north and east.

.SPOTTER INFORMATION STATEMENT...

Spotter activation is not expected at this time.

$$
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...