MikeB_01 Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 4 hours ago, Rd9108 said: So I see this and my question is this says on average we get a 8-12 storm every 2 years. When was our last 8-12 storm. I remember maybe one in April a few years ago but nothing really sticks out. I think the late January of 2015 had a nice set up. I remember that it was a big one that we were tracking for a while. It gave D.C. almost 3 ft of snow and some people south and east of us 2 ft. I also remember it over performing a little for us from what the models predicted. I was expecting 4-6 and got 9 in my backyard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeB_01 Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 14 minutes ago, MikeB_01 said: I think the late January of 2015 had a nice set up. I remember that it was a big one that we were tracking for a while. It gave D.C. almost 3 ft of snow and some people south and east of us 2 ft. I also remember it over performing a little for us from what the models predicted. I was expecting 4-6 and got 9 in my backyard. Sorry it was January of 2106 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mailman Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 12z Euro seems to have on and off snow chances for the next 10 days (some changeover events in there). No big events, but I'll take it in December! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rd9108 Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 1 hour ago, MikeB_01 said: Sorry it was January of 2106 I got like 4 or 5 inches in the city from that one. We usually atleast get one or 2 of those a year and it just seems lately that we struggle to get one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
north pgh Posted December 11, 2017 Author Share Posted December 11, 2017 looking like a general one inch or less of blowing snow showers tomorrow. Wed eve and Thurs morning looking more interesting on NAM. Could be a nice 1-3 swatch across all areas. Either way will nice to get the ground white and snow in the air. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rd9108 Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 1 hour ago, north pgh said: looking like a general one inch or less of blowing snow showers tomorrow. Wed eve and Thurs morning looking more interesting on NAM. Could be a nice 1-3 swatch across all areas. Either way will nice to get the ground white and snow in the air. Any sign of lake effect showers possible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mailman Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 Thursday looking solid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoraopolisWx Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 The NWS in their AFD this afternoon, even mentioned Thursdays system as having the potential to provide snow to those who don't get much tomorrow. It almost sounded like something we would say. Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rd9108 Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 Gfs actually looks good for a change. Won't play out what it's showing but atleast we have some things to track. It's boring when there's nothing to track. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RitualOfTheTrout Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 2 hours ago, Mailman said: Thursday looking solid. Good track for us, now to get greedy and hope it slows down a bit and gets a little juicier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoraopolisWx Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 54 minutes ago, Rd9108 said: Gfs actually looks good for a change. Won't play out what it's showing but atleast we have some things to track. It's boring when there's nothing to track. This is a bit OT, but the TT GFS temp and snow maps seem to over do the urban heat island here in Pgh. I think the UHI is more pronounced in the summer, but in the winter, snowfall is more elevation dependent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RitualOfTheTrout Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 Great discussion by NWS: .NEAR TERM /UNTIL 6 PM THIS EVENING/... Surface low pressure is currently departing the northeastern reaches of the area. Cold advection has already started quickly with its passage. Thus, most all areas have seen their highs for the day with a slowly falling temperature trend this morning, folloed by a remarkably quicker decline this afternoon as a secondary frontal boundary surges through the area. Large scale deformation around the surface low tracking through is spreading snow across areas north of its track this morning largely in line with previous expectations, even if the snow got started a bit later than previously projected. Temperatures in the deformation zone quickly fall toward and below freezing with precipitation onset, and given weak snow-to-liquid ratios through the start of the snowfall that have always been expected, snow accumulations from the system itself this morning should largely be relegated to areas north of Pittsburgh. Things rapidly change as the Arctic boundary pushes into the area as the last vestiges of deformational ascent depart to the east. Rapid cold advection will work to quickly destabilize the column and saturate the dendritic growth zone. This is evidenced by the linear band of snow activity pushing southeast of the Michigan/Ohio border, and it will continue southeastward through our area today. As it passes, a burst of snow in a more unstable dendritic growth regime will be likely and rapidly cooling temperatures along the much stronger wind gusts will follow in its wake. This boundary would seem likely to drop up to an inch in just about every location in the lower elevations it passes, but the calculus looks to change dramatically as it intercepts the terrain. As boundary layer moisture gets progressively sandwiched into the terrain with the incoming boundary, rapid cooling aloft and upslope WNW flow will mean a drastically increasing snowfall intensity late this morning. A period of heavy upslope snow showers is likely as the -18C isotherm falls toward the ridgetops and wind gusts increase toward 40 mph. It is possible that local blizzard conditions will result, particularly in Garrett/Preston/Tucker Counties, however the duration of heavy snowfall should only continue through the afternoon as once the immediate post-frontal instability effects are exhausted, flow looks to be too westerly for a decent moisture feed toward the terrain. Thus, the winter weather advisory has been maintained, even with high snow rates expected through the daytime today, as they should fall off tonight. Fries && .SHORT TERM /6 PM THIS EVENING THROUGH THURSDAY/... Right as the moisture into the ridges starts to become exhausted, yet another mid-level short wave tracks southward across Lake Erie, which will turn our eyes farther north for the overnight hours. An increase in inversion heights and reorientation of the flow over basically all of the Great Lakes starts to occur tonight. A multi-lake fetch from Lake Huron over eastern Lake Erie is probably the moist poignant feature to follow. In this area, with inversion heights running up over 11 kft and lake-induced troughing downstream from the lake increasing boundary layer friction effects, a single dominant band is suggested by both large scale and meso-models that tracks into the northern CWA overnight into Wednesday morning. The models are showing good consistency with this feature, and previous discussions and headlines have captured the threat quite realistically with the meteorology being rehashed ad nauseum. Timing on tongiht`s runs is similar, and thus tonight still looks like the highest accumulation period for Venango/Forest/northern Clarion. Elsewhere tonight, again two other bands seem to be showing up in large scale model guidances with remarkable persistence such that incorporating them into the forecast became a bit more necessary. The first and probably most impactful of these is a Superior-northern Michigan-western Erie band with a trajectory over northern Ohio toward Columbiana, Beaver, Allegheny, and Westmoreland Counties. Given the long overland trajectory from the lake, it would seem substantial accumulations would be unlikely, however the persistence in this band in guidance coupled with an impressive instability profile have resulted in PoPs being increased along this corridor with general snow expectations kicked up about an inch from previous forecasts. This includes the Pittsburgh area. Given the first dominant banding position, while upslope snows should be fairly minimized tonight into Wednesday for most of the ridge locations, this many not end up being the case for the ridges in Westmoreland County. Here again, the evolution of this band will need to be evaluated, as any persistence of it combined with upslope flow will necessitate an upgrade of the current advisory to a warning. The second band is the shore-parallel band that is currently extending down the eastern shore of Lake Michigan that models across suggest will traverse all the way into central Ohio and WV as the Arctic front surges southeast by tonight. While the consensus suggests this band will lie just to the south of our CWA, it seemed worth mentioning here as it may play a role in the forecast depending upon low-level wind evolution. While flow starts to turn more southwesterly by Wednesday afternoon, lake effect bands will quickly transition to the northeast and out of the area. However, as warm advection begins in earnest ahead of the next system dropping toward the area for Wednesday night, isentropic ascent in the 290-300K layer and strong southwesterly moisture transport will rapidly increase a field of snowfall from west to east across the area. This will be in advance of a surface low that the model consensus tracks southeastward from the western Great Lakes toward the PA/WV border during Wednesday night. Some disagreement exists on the strength of the system, with the NAM persisting a closed low- level center and thus stronger deformation than the GFS/EC/Canadian, however indications are that at least modest deformation/frontogenetical light will follow the isentropic ascent such that a maximized swath of QPF will be likely from northern Ohio through western PA toward the Alleghenies. Lifting and moisture profiles suggest a much deeper moist layer and a far higher dendritic growth region. Thus, snow-to-liquid ratios will not be as impressive as earlier in the week, however a gradation from 15 to 10 from N to S is suggested, and as such a swath of winter weather advisories may be necessary as this system dives southeastward. These will need to be covered in future forecast updates, however, as ongoing headlines preclude issuing them at the moment for the sake of clarity. Fries Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KPITSnow Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 33 minutes ago, RitualOfTheTrout said: Great discussion by NWS: .NEAR TERM /UNTIL 6 PM THIS EVENING/... Surface low pressure is currently departing the northeastern reaches of the area. Cold advection has already started quickly with its passage. Thus, most all areas have seen their highs for the day with a slowly falling temperature trend this morning, folloed by a remarkably quicker decline this afternoon as a secondary frontal boundary surges through the area. Large scale deformation around the surface low tracking through is spreading snow across areas north of its track this morning largely in line with previous expectations, even if the snow got started a bit later than previously projected. Temperatures in the deformation zone quickly fall toward and below freezing with precipitation onset, and given weak snow-to-liquid ratios through the start of the snowfall that have always been expected, snow accumulations from the system itself this morning should largely be relegated to areas north of Pittsburgh. Things rapidly change as the Arctic boundary pushes into the area as the last vestiges of deformational ascent depart to the east. Rapid cold advection will work to quickly destabilize the column and saturate the dendritic growth zone. This is evidenced by the linear band of snow activity pushing southeast of the Michigan/Ohio border, and it will continue southeastward through our area today. As it passes, a burst of snow in a more unstable dendritic growth regime will be likely and rapidly cooling temperatures along the much stronger wind gusts will follow in its wake. This boundary would seem likely to drop up to an inch in just about every location in the lower elevations it passes, but the calculus looks to change dramatically as it intercepts the terrain. As boundary layer moisture gets progressively sandwiched into the terrain with the incoming boundary, rapid cooling aloft and upslope WNW flow will mean a drastically increasing snowfall intensity late this morning. A period of heavy upslope snow showers is likely as the -18C isotherm falls toward the ridgetops and wind gusts increase toward 40 mph. It is possible that local blizzard conditions will result, particularly in Garrett/Preston/Tucker Counties, however the duration of heavy snowfall should only continue through the afternoon as once the immediate post-frontal instability effects are exhausted, flow looks to be too westerly for a decent moisture feed toward the terrain. Thus, the winter weather advisory has been maintained, even with high snow rates expected through the daytime today, as they should fall off tonight. Fries && .SHORT TERM /6 PM THIS EVENING THROUGH THURSDAY/... Right as the moisture into the ridges starts to become exhausted, yet another mid-level short wave tracks southward across Lake Erie, which will turn our eyes farther north for the overnight hours. An increase in inversion heights and reorientation of the flow over basically all of the Great Lakes starts to occur tonight. A multi-lake fetch from Lake Huron over eastern Lake Erie is probably the moist poignant feature to follow. In this area, with inversion heights running up over 11 kft and lake-induced troughing downstream from the lake increasing boundary layer friction effects, a single dominant band is suggested by both large scale and meso-models that tracks into the northern CWA overnight into Wednesday morning. The models are showing good consistency with this feature, and previous discussions and headlines have captured the threat quite realistically with the meteorology being rehashed ad nauseum. Timing on tongiht`s runs is similar, and thus tonight still looks like the highest accumulation period for Venango/Forest/northern Clarion. Elsewhere tonight, again two other bands seem to be showing up in large scale model guidances with remarkable persistence such that incorporating them into the forecast became a bit more necessary. The first and probably most impactful of these is a Superior-northern Michigan-western Erie band with a trajectory over northern Ohio toward Columbiana, Beaver, Allegheny, and Westmoreland Counties. Given the long overland trajectory from the lake, it would seem substantial accumulations would be unlikely, however the persistence in this band in guidance coupled with an impressive instability profile have resulted in PoPs being increased along this corridor with general snow expectations kicked up about an inch from previous forecasts. This includes the Pittsburgh area. Given the first dominant banding position, while upslope snows should be fairly minimized tonight into Wednesday for most of the ridge locations, this many not end up being the case for the ridges in Westmoreland County. Here again, the evolution of this band will need to be evaluated, as any persistence of it combined with upslope flow will necessitate an upgrade of the current advisory to a warning. The second band is the shore-parallel band that is currently extending down the eastern shore of Lake Michigan that models across suggest will traverse all the way into central Ohio and WV as the Arctic front surges southeast by tonight. While the consensus suggests this band will lie just to the south of our CWA, it seemed worth mentioning here as it may play a role in the forecast depending upon low-level wind evolution. While flow starts to turn more southwesterly by Wednesday afternoon, lake effect bands will quickly transition to the northeast and out of the area. However, as warm advection begins in earnest ahead of the next system dropping toward the area for Wednesday night, isentropic ascent in the 290-300K layer and strong southwesterly moisture transport will rapidly increase a field of snowfall from west to east across the area. This will be in advance of a surface low that the model consensus tracks southeastward from the western Great Lakes toward the PA/WV border during Wednesday night. Some disagreement exists on the strength of the system, with the NAM persisting a closed low- level center and thus stronger deformation than the GFS/EC/Canadian, however indications are that at least modest deformation/frontogenetical light will follow the isentropic ascent such that a maximized swath of QPF will be likely from northern Ohio through western PA toward the Alleghenies. Lifting and moisture profiles suggest a much deeper moist layer and a far higher dendritic growth region. Thus, snow-to-liquid ratios will not be as impressive as earlier in the week, however a gradation from 15 to 10 from N to S is suggested, and as such a swath of winter weather advisories may be necessary as this system dives southeastward. These will need to be covered in future forecast updates, however, as ongoing headlines preclude issuing them at the moment for the sake of clarity. Fries Great discussion! It seems that puts out detailed, in depth discussions all the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dj3 Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 Tomorrow night looks promising. A nice cold event, hopefully it ends up over-performing. I’d love to have something to track around the holiday so hopefully the long range look trends a bit colder as the signal for precip seems stronger during the period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rd9108 Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 NAM sucks this one is dying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackngoldrules Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 NAM sucks this one is dying. What else is new. LolSent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rd9108 Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 Just now, blackngoldrules said: What else is new. Lol Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk Now that I think about it it's not as bad as I thought. It all depends on the ratios. I doubt they will be 10 to 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longdong Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 8 minutes ago, Rd9108 said: Now that I think about it it's not as bad as I thought. It all depends on the ratios. I doubt they will be 10 to 1 What’s it saying? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KPITSnow Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 7 minutes ago, Rd9108 said: Now that I think about it it's not as bad as I thought. It all depends on the ratios. I doubt they will be 10 to 1 As usual, we are fringed. Best qpf is north. 80 north could get 3 to 5 inches while we are closer to 1-2 unfortunately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeB_01 Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 1 minute ago, Rd9108 said: Now that I think about it it's not as bad as I thought. It all depends on the ratios. I doubt they will be 10 to 1 Honestly, I think this run should be rejected in a sense. Not that it was a bad run, the L is a little stronger, the precip just wasn't there. The important thing is that we still have the same general idea from the system. Keep it where it is and we can nowcast. Hopefully over producing. SREF is showing 2-3 and so is the GEFS. Hoping for 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mailman Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rd9108 Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 RGEM looks great Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KPITSnow Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 4 minutes ago, Rd9108 said: RGEM looks great Images? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mailman Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 18z GFS looks better than the RGEM (although I guess that depends on where you are). GFS: RGEM: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jwilson Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 On the fringes to the North and East. Not really expecting much from this thing. In a season without the southern jet, I probably should get used to this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RitualOfTheTrout Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 Anyone been under that persistent band cutting through Allegheny county? When I left work there was about a 1.5 - 2 inches on the ground. By the time I got home saying I have a dusting would be generous. It's literally about 10 miles south of me, hoping it pivots to the north for a bit. As for tomorrow, I think 2-4 looks good right now. Don't like seeing that cutoff in extreme SW corner of PA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
north pgh Posted December 13, 2017 Author Share Posted December 13, 2017 2 hours ago, RitualOfTheTrout said: Anyone been under that persistent band cutting through Allegheny county? When I left work there was about a 1.5 - 2 inches on the ground. By the time I got home saying I have a dusting would be generous. It's literally about 10 miles south of me, hoping it pivots to the north for a bit. As for tomorrow, I think 2-4 looks good right now. Don't like seeing that cutoff in extreme SW corner of PA. I was under one of those bands and picked up a solid inch between 4 and 6. Roads weren't too bad but traffic was horrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChalkHillSnowNut Posted December 13, 2017 Share Posted December 13, 2017 I’ll tell you what I was just out shoveling our 1” of snow-lol and it’s freaking COOOLD!!...wish we could hang on to the cold for Christmas but that weekend leading up looks like rain/snow mix.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackngoldrules Posted December 13, 2017 Share Posted December 13, 2017 47 minutes ago, ChalkHillSnowNut said: I’ll tell you what I was just out shoveling our 1” of snow-lol and it’s freaking COOOLD!!...wish we could hang on to the cold for Christmas but that weekend leading up looks like rain/snow mix.... I was just outside shoveling our dusting of snow, and agree that it's freaking COOOLD!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoraopolisWx Posted December 13, 2017 Share Posted December 13, 2017 3 hours ago, RitualOfTheTrout said: Anyone been under that persistent band cutting through Allegheny county? When I left work there was about a 1.5 - 2 inches on the ground. By the time I got home saying I have a dusting would be generous. It's literally about 10 miles south of me, hoping it pivots to the north for a bit. As for tomorrow, I think 2-4 looks good right now. Don't like seeing that cutoff in extreme SW corner of PA. Checking out the traffic cams this afternoon, I noticed the 28 corridor was almost bare in many spots. I thought at first the images were from yesterday, but it was actually real time. There must've been a pocket of dry air in that area, causing the low amounts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.