Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

October 29-30th Intense Storm From Tropics Discussions & Observations


bluewave

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
12 minutes ago, bluewave said:

Every other model turns it back into some portion of New Jersey. It's the lone hold out.

 

11 minutes ago, Snow88 said:

The public thinks this will be a regular rainstorm because Mets are being conservative .

Guys, you are wasting your time. He has been doing this all day in multiple forums trying to prove his point. In other news, I am still surprised Mt.Holly hasn't expanded/upgraded or issued any new watches/warnings, I guess they are waiting for the 00z runs and will issue with the early morning update.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rtd208 said:

 

Guys, you are wasting your time. he has been doing this all day in multiple forums trying to prove his point. In other news, I am still surprised Mt.Holly hasn't expanded/upgraded or issued any new watches/warnings, I guess they are waiting for the 00z runs and will issue with the early morning update.

Same with CTP. forecasting 2-4 inches of rain, and not even a flood watch, less alone wind advisory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Voyager said:

Same with CTP. forecasting 2-4 inches of rain, and not even a flood watch, less alone wind advisory.

What confuses me even more is that Mt.Holly did issue Flood Watches for their northern most counties in NJ above the Middlesex/Somerset/Hunterdon line. Meanwhile Upton has pretty much gone all in for most of their forecast area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bluewave said:

I wish we had another model as good as the ECMWF handeling tropical energy interactions with the midlatitude pattern. It would give the NWS more confidence issuing longer range warnings. Seems like they are waiting for the last minute because they are afraid to rely on one model too much.

 

Honestly, I would expect the wait more from Upton then Mt.Holly which is usually the more aggressive office but then again I guess it depends on the crew that is working the shift. Sometimes it seems like the collaboration between offices is not that great IMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, bluewave said:

I wish we had another model as good as the ECMWF with tropical energy interactions and the midlatitude pattern. It would give the NWS more confidence issuing longer range warnings. Seems like they are waiting for the last minute because they are afraid to rely on one model too much.

 

The RGEM is a higher res model with a longer range package now. If it's in line with the euro it's a good sign. Rgem did pretty well with the placement of the heaviest rain band last Sunday and is generally good handling convection

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, bluewave said:

They are really overworked according to that article you posted yesterday. I believe they are trained to look for model consensus before committing to a final forecast. It's just tough for them to do with the NWP program lagging the Europeans.

I was thinking the same thing pertaining to the article, I think the issue is the GFS is considered to be the flagship model for the NWS so things are weighted more heavily towards it but I could be wrong. Not to put down or degrade the NWS in any way but I also think their entire internal operation needs to be overhauled which I know that is something currently in the works over the next few years or so. Sounds like they will be streamlining their entire operation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, bluewave said:

I wish we had another model as good as the ECMWF with tropical energy interactions and the midlatitude pattern. It would give the NWS more confidence issuing longer range warnings. Seems like they are waiting for the last minute because they are afraid to rely on one model too much.

 

the eps being west of the op is a big sign imo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, forkyfork said:

it's annoying how the nam looks euro like and then strings the low out after landfall. maybe this has to do with how unusual this storm is. i certainly can't think of anything else like it

The Euro is south of cape May and then NW into the Poconos while strengthening it's an outlier.  How am I the only one seeing this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, qg_omega said:

The Euro is south of cape May and then NW into the Poconos while strengthening it's an outlier.  How am I the only one seeing this

The Euro isn't that far south. The Nam isn't too far off from the Euro. 

EPS is in SNJ

What are you trying to prove ? You keep posting the same thing over and over again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, forkyfork said:

it's annoying how the nam looks euro like and then strings the low out after landfall. maybe this has to do with how unusual this storm is. i certainly can't think of anything else like it

The track, intensity, dual low structure, and tropical connection remind me a lot of late December '94

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Juliancolton said:

The track, intensity, dual low structure, and tropical connection remind me a lot of late December '94

my issues with that comparison are:

sst's are much warmer this time

the upper system was weaker in 94

it didn't get driven inland on a nnw heading

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, forkyfork said:

my issues with that comparison are:

sst's are much warmer this time

the upper system was weaker in 94

it didn't get driven inland on a nnw heading

Yeah, this is certainly a more dynamic system. Maybe I should have said trajectory or motion instead of track... even though it never made it far inland like you mention, the main low notably hooked NW prior to the merger. Storms are getting so extreme these days that you have to sort of squint your eyes and use your imagination to make analogs work.

 

1994.gif.dedf3dca55fc4197c545d1e4718488d8.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...