tnweathernut Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 On 12/22/2010 at 5:43 PM, SBUWX23 said: Nail all the way in? Come on? You do not think its possible the GFS or GGEM cant shift a little further west in the amount of time left? Not saying that, but for the midsouth, and mountains.........the GFS and GGEm would have to come a lot more west. Still possible to get a little I'd say, but big storm, not so much. Just my opinion though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoothillsNC Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 at 30 its the same it looks like. Opened up wave south of the 4 corners. By 36 hours, its in central NM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strongwxnc Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 This morning AFD from KGSP was talking about low end amounts. Which most would be happy with. But...... On 12/22/2010 at 5:56 PM, tnweathernut said: Not saying that, but for the midsouth, and mountains.........the GFS and GGEm would have to come a lot more west. Still possible to get a little I'd say, but big storm, not so much. Just my opinion though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wow Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 same at 36 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaryWx Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 For what it's worth here...they are briming roads in Cary, NC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wow Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 42.. HP nosing in further south a bit more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoothillsNC Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 at 48, its nearly closed off over the Tex. panhandle. If I recall the earlier run had it fully closed? Still a minor difference just going by the 6 hour increments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wow Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 same position at 48.. still opened.. had closed contour on 0z by this time, but looks to occur right after this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tarheelwx Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 MTC. For inland NC and SC, the GFS is EXACTLY where you want it. It couldn't be better. TW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wake4est Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 On 12/22/2010 at 5:58 PM, CaryWx said: For what it's worth here...they are briming roads in Cary, NC Yeah, the front of my black Chevy Trailblazer is now painted white after driving a half-mile behind a brining truck this morning in Cary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jburns Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 On 12/22/2010 at 5:58 PM, CaryWx said: For what it's worth here...they are briming roads in Cary, NC Probably has more to do with not wanting to work Christmas eve and Christmas than anything else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheeznado Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 48 very similar. Different than the GFS. less positively tilted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wow Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 s/w a hair north a 54 compared to 0z. strength identical. it's cut off now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoothillsNC Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 at 54, its closed again between amarillo and Witchita Falls Tx. I like the looks of the split in the flow and teh amplitude of the building PNA ridge, as well as the structure of the southern shortwave. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil882 Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 The two things we want to watch are intensity of s/w and position. Anything further south and weaker is bad, while further north and stronger is generally a good trend. Thus far we are slightly further south and slightly weaker with the s/w... so unless this changes before the period we are all interested in, I think we will have a slightly less amplified solution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wow Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 a touch slower at 60.. so that's good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoothillsNC Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 at 60, its a good precip event in Ok and northern Texas. Good inverted trough and the low is still closed in Wichita Falls area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bingcrosbyb Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 60 looking good. Maybe a hair west? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wow Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 On 12/22/2010 at 6:03 PM, phil882 said: The two things we want to watch are intensity of s/w and position. Anything further south and weaker is bad, while further north and stronger is generally a good trend. Thus far we are slightly further south and slightly weaker with the s/w... so unless this changes before the period we are all interested in, I think we will have a slightly less amplified solution. it's not further south. strength is near identical Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheeznado Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 Weaker at 60, same longitude a bit north. What I do not like is the northern stream, the SW that is supposed to be the phaser is a bit weaker/slower Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoothillsNC Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 heavy rain in eastern Tx at 66 and snow in northern Ark. I'd like to see a little more ridging in the Canada area though, but the southern wve is still closed north of Dallas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormsfury Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 On 12/22/2010 at 5:49 PM, Wow said: I know that one, but I thought there was also one outside the short range I am pretty positive they removed the truncation that used to exist from 84 to 192 and it's just one truncation period from 192 beyond. The old truncation periods were truncate at 84, truncate at 192. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wow Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 On 12/22/2010 at 6:06 PM, Cheeznado said: Weaker at 60, same longitude a bit north. What I do not like is the northern stream, the SW that is supposed to be the phaser is a bit weaker/slower yeah it's not bending back into as much... uh oh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoothillsNC Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 at 72, strong shrotwave diving into eastern Kansas, low opening up in eastern TEx. Looks like a phaser is likely to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil882 Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 On 12/22/2010 at 6:04 PM, Wow said: it's not further south. strength is near identical whoops... I was just going off what some of the initial posts were saying. I obviously don't have access Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheeznado Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 Spoke too soon 72 a lot better, looks like a phase with northern stream SW west of 00Z Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wow Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 ah there it is at 72 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wow Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 On 12/22/2010 at 6:07 PM, FoothillsNC said: at 72, strong shrotwave diving into eastern Kansas, low opening up in eastern TEx. Looks like a phaser is likely to me. yeah, we've got the 3 waves lined up and ready! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bingcrosbyb Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 Hmmm. Phasing a little west @ 72. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wow Posted December 22, 2010 Share Posted December 22, 2010 a small hair more west.. but may not matter here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.