Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Fall Banter & General Discussion/Observations


CapturedNature

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
3 hours ago, dendrite said:

Whatever. Most sites were well BN in those last few days of August into the first week of Sep. The point still stands. I don't care if we're running +15F so far...if the pattern is right we could still be damn cold for November. C'mon, you of all people know how extreme it can get from one month to the next.

Yeah that's a weird post by him...usually he's fairly reasonable on how departures can behave. I wonder if we all cancelled winter after the first 10 days of October 2007 came in at +9.

 

First 10 days of December that same year? -9.1 at ORH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

Why is it exactly that sometimes when supercell storms ride along a boundary that can enhance the "helicity" within the storm?  

Also, see this hodograpgh....what causes that sudden downward notch?  Are the axis on the x and y winds in m/s?  

First question: Helicity is just a measure of area "under" the hodograph. More turning = more helicity. Boundaries are local areas of turning winds. Storms gain cyclonic rotation with higher amounts of streamwise vorticity (component along the mean wind). But a warm front or FFD is a good place to find higher amounts of streamwise vorticity. Hence storms that ride a boundary will tend to enhance their cyclonic rotation relative to other storms. (more info from just prior to VORTEX: https://www.usna.edu/Users/oceano/barrett/SO441/markowski_richardson_2009.pdf)

Second question: Looking at the raw data there is a 240-245 wind at 32 knots just below 2 km that would account for that notch. It also appears that the hodograph is in knots, but you may see them in m/s from time to time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OceanStWx said:

First question: Helicity is just a measure of area "under" the hodograph. More turning = more helicity. Boundaries are local areas of turning winds. Storms gain cyclonic rotation with higher amounts of streamwise vorticity (component along the mean wind). But a warm front or FFD is a good place to find higher amounts of streamwise vorticity. Hence storms that ride a boundary will tend to enhance their cyclonic rotation relative to other storms. (more info from just prior to VORTEX: https://www.usna.edu/Users/oceano/barrett/SO441/markowski_richardson_2009.pdf)

Second question: Looking at the raw data there is a 240-245 wind at 32 knots just below 2 km that would account for that notch. It also appears that the hodograph is in knots, but you may see them in m/s from time to time.

Thank you!!

I was helping a classmate with his project (he's doing the EF5 in Moore, OK from 2013) and I explained how he should talk about how the storm seemed to ride the boundary which can enhance storm rotation but didn't know how to explain clearly...this helps a great deal.  

I didn't think to look at the raw data...good note to keep in mind for the future

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OceanStWx said:

First question: Helicity is just a measure of area "under" the hodograph. More turning = more helicity. Boundaries are local areas of turning winds. Storms gain cyclonic rotation with higher amounts of streamwise vorticity (component along the mean wind). But a warm front or FFD is a good place to find higher amounts of streamwise vorticity. Hence storms that ride a boundary will tend to enhance their cyclonic rotation relative to other storms. (more info from just prior to VORTEX: https://www.usna.edu/Users/oceano/barrett/SO441/markowski_richardson_2009.pdf)

Second question: Looking at the raw data there is a 240-245 wind at 32 knots just below 2 km that would account for that notch. It also appears that the hodograph is in knots, but you may see them in m/s from time to time.

One other question...remember a while back you explained the difference between a backing wind and a veering wind and how some describe backing winds with severe wx and some with cold air advection and such.  Trying to explain it to someone that you can use backing winds when talking about severe wx but it depended on how you referenced it.  How did you explain that again?  What I was trying to say was it had to do with how the winds evolved over time (so like if sfc winds transitioned from SW to SE over time...that was backing) or if you're talking about the wind fields from the upper levels to the lower levels...the winds would be turning counterclockwise with decreasing height (backing) while if you went with increasing altitude they're turning clockwise with height (veering)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

One other question...remember a while back you explained the difference between a backing wind and a veering wind and how some describe backing winds with severe wx and some with cold air advection and such.  Trying to explain it to someone that you can use backing winds when talking about severe wx but it depended on how you referenced it.  How did you explain that again?  What I was trying to say was it had to do with how the winds evolved over time (so like if sfc winds transitioned from SW to SE over time...that was backing) or if you're talking about the wind fields from the upper levels to the lower levels...the winds would be turning counterclockwise with decreasing height (backing) while if you went with increasing altitude they're turning clockwise with height (veering)

It all depends on your frame of reference. Are you describing winds at a point over time, or winds at a point with height.

Say from 18-21z your wind direction changes from S to SE. Your wind has backed. 

But at the same location looking aloft your winds may change from S at the surface to SW aloft. You have veering winds with heights. 

When you talk about advection, you're talking about changes in wind with height mostly. Veering = WAA, backing = CAA. The reason is that winds and generally westerly aloft, and assuming that veering winds mean you have a southerly component in the low levels (warm), backing winds mean you have a northerly component in the low levels (cold).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, OceanStWx said:

It all depends on your frame of reference. Are you describing winds at a point over time, or winds at a point with height.

Say from 18-21z your wind direction changes from S to SE. Your wind has backed. 

But at the same location looking aloft your winds may change from S at the surface to SW aloft. You have veering winds with heights. 

When you talk about advection, you're talking about changes in wind with height mostly. Veering = WAA, backing = CAA. The reason is that winds and generally westerly aloft, and assuming that veering winds mean you have a southerly component in the low levels (warm), backing winds mean you have a northerly component in the low levels (cold).

This is great!!!  Thanks so much

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, dendrite said:

Nice cold downpours right now.

48F and moderate rain. Feels like deep fall out there.

Today really felt raw, even though we didn't see any rain up here.  Temps slipping down through the 40s at work and a few pulses of wind had me breaking out the jacket and hat when outside.  Slate gray sky though with virga looking streaks to the south that almost looked like snow.  A very cold season type view and appeal.

It is amazing you are raining or having downpours with how dry it is aloft just to your north.

Mount Washington is in the 15-17% range for Relative Humidity the past couple hours... 39/-4 while you are raining, lol.

KMWN 112255Z 35009KT 100SM SCT015 BKN030 OVC160 04/M20 RMK VIRGA OHD AND SE-NW SH DSNT S-SW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ORH_wxman said:

Yeah that's a weird post by him...usually he's fairly reasonable on how departures can behave. I wonder if we all cancelled winter after the first 10 days of October 2007 came in at +9.

 

First 10 days of December that same year? -9.1 at ORH.

He seems to have meltdowns over not getting record cold anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

What's a good amount of money to have to storm chase in the Plains for like a week?  What would be a comfortable amount to bring?  I wouldn't go alone...probably 3-4 people.  Would $1000 per person be sufficient?  

I've been two years in a row for two weeks and I usually end up spending about 300-500 on food, and roughly 60 a night for a hotel. Seems like 1000 would be fine as long as you aren't fine dining every night, staying at expensive hotels, or driving a hummer up and down the plains.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LoveSN+ said:

I've been two years in a row for two weeks and I usually end up spending about 300-500 on food, and roughly 60 a night for a hotel. Seems like 1000 would be fine as long as you aren't fine dining every night, staying at expensive hotels, or driving a hummer up and down the plains.

I'm perfectly fine with McDonalds everyday and don't care what type of hotel as long as it's cheap.  As long as they sell 40's of Steel Reserve in the Plains I'm golden.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, weatherwiz said:

I'm perfectly fine with McDonalds everyday and don't care what type of hotel as long as it's cheap.  As long as they sell 40's of Steel Reserve in the Plains I'm golden.  

 

You should have plenty then with $1000. Love chasing. Had two great experiences, two years in a row.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

What's a good amount of money to have to storm chase in the Plains for like a week?  What would be a comfortable amount to bring?  I wouldn't go alone...probably 3-4 people.  Would $1000 per person be sufficient?  

Gas station hot dogs are pretty cheap. :weenie:

That amount per person with 3-4 people should be fine. I assume you aren't including the flight in that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

I'm perfectly fine with McDonalds everyday and don't care what type of hotel as long as it's cheap.  As long as they sell 40's of Steel Reserve in the Plains I'm golden.  

 

May want to avoid OK and their watered down beer then. 

Though I would avoid OK anyway. Chaser convergence is not my idea of a good time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LoveSN+ said:

You should have plenty then with $1000. Love chasing. Had two great experiences, two years in a row.

I need to go badly

2 minutes ago, OceanStWx said:

Gas station hot dogs are pretty cheap. :weenie:

That amount per person with 3-4 people should be fine. I assume you aren't including the flight in that.

Yeah I would just drive

1 minute ago, OceanStWx said:

May want to avoid OK and their watered down beer then. 

Though I would avoid OK anyway. Chaser convergence is not my idea of a good time.

Yeah given all the stories about OK I think I would avoid that state.  I've even considered like doing the northern Plains...MT/ND/SD. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, weatherwiz said:

I need to go badly

Yeah I would just drive

Yeah given all the stories about OK I think I would avoid that state.  I've even considered like doing the northern Plains...MT/ND/SD. 

Careful of the road network, you may have trouble staying on a storm with limited options. WY/CO/NE/NM high plains are nice. Western KS too, but that will be busy on a big day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Core punching is not something I would generally suggest. Not sure about you, but I really don't want baseballs (or bigger) coming down on my vehicle, which has glass windows. Additionally, if you are in the hail, you won't be seeing the potentially amazing structure of the supercell itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have any suggestions on what to explore for broadcast weather graphics?  I've reached out to The Weather Company (formerly WSI), and Baron but have not heard back and I've done so much googling.  But at school all we use is powerpoint with less than attractive graphics and its really embarrassing.  As treasurer for the meteorology club, my mission to to enhance the tools we have to work with and make the school more competitive.  I'm trying to do a ton...like get bufkit installed (and working properly), get GR lvl 2 radar installed, get full a great modeling package (which I'm going to propose what Amwx offers :) ), and so much more.  It sucks composing a broadcast and using graphics that look horrific...and using Powerpoint

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...