SnoSki14 Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 46 minutes ago, SN_Lover said: Not with this look...Still a week+ out. But with this look, a re-curve is highly likely. That shows building heights north of the storm, definitely not an OTS look if the storm is not far north enough to take advantage of the weakness. OTS is the most likely scenario this far out but odds are probably 65-70 vs. the climo 90 percent at this time based on it's present location. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJwx85 Posted September 1, 2017 Author Share Posted September 1, 2017 000 WTNT41 KNHC 012050 TCDAT1 Hurricane Irma Discussion Number 10 NWS National Hurricane Center Miami FL AL112017 500 PM AST Fri Sep 01 2017 Well, that eyewall replacement cycle didn't last long. Satellite images indicate that the cycle is now complete, with Irma displaying a larger warm eye. The initial wind speed has been set to 105 kt, in agreement with the CIMSS ADT. Since the eyewall cycle is finished, some strengthening is possible, although SSTs are currently pretty marginal. Although no increase in winds is shown in the short term, this could be conservative. During the next few days, water temperatures along the track will warm significantly, but there could be some higher shear, and of course more eyewall replacements. The forecast is a compromise between the statistical/dynamical models, which bring the intensity down then up again, versus the global models and hurricane models, which show a rather strong cyclone. The westward turn of Irma has begun, and the current motion is 275/12. A building mid-level high should cause the hurricane to turn west-southwestward tomorrow and continue through early next week. Later on, Irma should reach the southern periphery of the ridge, and begin to move west-northwestward. The biggest change since the last forecast is that the GFS and its ensemble has trended southwestward, toward the unwavering ECMWF model on the track forecast. Given the trend in guidance, little change is made to the official track prediction, although the corrected consensus models and the HWRF are now southwest of the latest forecast. KEY MESSAGES: 1. Irma is expected to be a major hurricane when it approaches the Lesser Antilles early next week, producing rough surf and rip currents. Irma could also cause dangerous wind, storm surge, and rainfall impacts on some islands, although it is too soon to specify where and when those hazards could occur. Residents in the Lesser Antilles should monitor the progress of Irma through the weekend and listen to any advice given by local officials. 2. It is much too early to determine what direct impacts Irma will have on the continental United States. Regardless, everyone in hurricane-prone areas should ensure that they have their hurricane plan in place, as we are now near the peak of the season. FORECAST POSITIONS AND MAX WINDS INIT 01/2100Z 18.8N 39.1W 105 KT 120 MPH 12H 02/0600Z 18.9N 40.9W 105 KT 120 MPH 24H 02/1800Z 18.5N 43.4W 105 KT 120 MPH 36H 03/0600Z 17.9N 45.7W 105 KT 120 MPH 48H 03/1800Z 17.2N 47.9W 105 KT 120 MPH 72H 04/1800Z 16.4N 52.2W 110 KT 125 MPH 96H 05/1800Z 17.0N 56.5W 110 KT 125 MPH 120H 06/1800Z 19.0N 61.0W 115 KT 130 MPH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hazey Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 She's even prettier than yesterday. It's remarkable what a full unfettered ERC can do. Just think what a few more can do with a more favourable environment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 With all these track comparisons, one that wasn't mentioned was Connie in 1955. Could be reasonable or may not be, which is the point I'm making. We don't have a good handle on the exact synoptic scale details at this point, so these comparisons to past storms at 10 days out are next to useless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donsutherland1 Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 For some historical context, since 1851 six tropical cyclones that were either hurricanes or went on to become hurricanes passed within 50 nautical miles of Irma's 5 pm location (18.8°N 39.1°W). One of those six systems went on to make U.S. landfall. Five did not. The storm that made landfall was the "Sea Islands" hurricane of 1893. That storm move north-northwestward off the Florida coast and then made landfall in extreme northeastern Georgia before moving across South Carolina as it gradually recurved. That hurricane made landfall as a Category 3 storm (100 kts) and brought Category 3 winds to parts of Georgia and South Carolina and Category 1 winds to North Carolina. See Hurricane #6: http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/atlantic/1893/index.php In the case of this hurricane, ridging was expanding westward to its north, which precluded an earlier turn out to sea. This storm also saw a period of time where it tracked west-southwestward, something that is forecast by some of the guidance for Irma. It's too soon to be confident in any landfall for Irma. At the same time, it would be premature to rule it out either, even as climatology would favor this outcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe4alb Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 If nothing else at the moment, Irma looks simply amazing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SN_Lover Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 Not much change at hour 48 on the GFS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 I believe Irma will be the first major hurricane of the satellite era to lose more than 2 degrees of latitude in a WSW dip in that part of the Atlantic. 12H 02/0600Z 18.9N 40.9W 105 KT 120 MPH 24H 02/1800Z 18.5N 43.4W 105 KT 120 MPH 36H 03/0600Z 17.9N 45.7W 105 KT 120 MPH 48H 03/1800Z 17.2N 47.9W 105 KT 120 MPH 72H 04/1800Z 16.4N 52.2W 110 KT 125 MPH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SN_Lover Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 Harvey NE of the 12z run at 108. things are looking slightly better on CONUS though.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eduardo Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 2 minutes ago, bluewave said: I believe Irma will be the first major hurricane of the satellite era to lose more than 2 degrees of latitude in a WSW dip in that part of the Atlantic. 12H 02/0600Z 18.9N 40.9W 105 KT 120 MPH 24H 02/1800Z 18.5N 43.4W 105 KT 120 MPH 36H 03/0600Z 17.9N 45.7W 105 KT 120 MPH 48H 03/1800Z 17.2N 47.9W 105 KT 120 MPH 72H 04/1800Z 16.4N 52.2W 110 KT 125 MPH That's a remarkable stat, Chris. I usually let the climo be my guide when it comes to tracking these things, but in Irma's case, my confidence is reduced. Odds usually disfavor a US LF (and still do at this point here IMO), but that said, the probability here seems higher than usual for a storm at her strength and location. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Random Chaos Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 18z GFS @ hr114 looks remarkably close tomtoday's 6z GFS, even down to the ridge and trough development. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SN_Lover Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 Trough needs to go more negative or it's a fish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycsnow Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 11 minutes ago, SN_Lover said: Trough needs to go more negative or it's a fish. Or phase Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SN_Lover Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 1 minute ago, nycsnow said: Or phase that's what a negative trough causes. looks like LF on the 18z imminent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Wiggum Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 Run to run changes are absurd, as expected at this range.Wow!Sent from my LG-V410 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycsnow Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 1 minute ago, SN_Lover said: that's what a negative trough causes. looks like LF on the 18z imminent. No I know, i meant those are our only 2 options lol, looking like it'll phase?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 The differences with the handling of that trough between the 12z and 18z runs is laughable, though not unexpected at this range. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SN_Lover Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 1 minute ago, nycsnow said: No I know, i meant those are our only 2 options lol, looking like it'll phase?? Think so. This trough is throwing the models for a loop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Random Chaos Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 Just now, Hoosier said: The differences with the handling of that trough between the 12z and 18z runs is laughable, though not unexpected at this range. Why we need some good pacific recon flights Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawkeye_wx Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 1 minute ago, Hoosier said: The differences with the handling of that trough between the 12z and 18z runs is laughable, though not unexpected at this range. The models have no clue what that trough is going to look like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTRWx Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 21 minutes ago, SN_Lover said: Trough needs to go more negative or it's a fish. That's pretty unlikely this time of year too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LandofLincoln Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 This run is a bit deceiving. The path is not that much different, but pretty much everything at the upper level is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycsnow Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 Mind you per gfs it's raining a lot in the mid Atlantic northeast as Irma approaches Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SN_Lover Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 LOL HYPE HYPE HYPE Hurricane Irma Could Slam Into United States As Category Five Storm http://www.iflscience.com/environment/hurricane-irma-slam-united-states-category-five-storm/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SN_Lover Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 Whoever made the sandy comment before jinxed this run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycsnow Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 Oh my gfs is gonna destroy NYC nj etc (just one run obv) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tatamy Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 This is a doomsday run for the NYC metro area... LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 This is the NYC weenie run. #resistthehype Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxmx Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 36 minutes ago, bluewave said: I believe Irma will be the first major hurricane of the satellite era to lose more than 2 degrees of latitude in a WSW dip in that part of the Atlantic. 12H 02/0600Z 18.9N 40.9W 105 KT 120 MPH 24H 02/1800Z 18.5N 43.4W 105 KT 120 MPH 36H 03/0600Z 17.9N 45.7W 105 KT 120 MPH 48H 03/1800Z 17.2N 47.9W 105 KT 120 MPH 72H 04/1800Z 16.4N 52.2W 110 KT 125 MPH Well, taking into account there has only been 5 recorded cases of majors east of 40W since 1851...not really a big pool to take samples from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TriPol Posted September 1, 2017 Share Posted September 1, 2017 Just now, Tatamy said: This is a doomsday run for the NYC metro area... LOL Serious or joke? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.