Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,910
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Elbel4053
    Newest Member
    Elbel4053
    Joined

Major Hurricane Irma


NJwx85

Recommended Posts

  On 9/3/2017 at 10:36 PM, TPAwx said:

The pressure outputs from this GFS run are inconceivable.

Expand  

with recon finding impressively low pressure, but less impressive winds, i wonder if the gfs could be correct?  i know winds take some time to react to pressure falls, but the gfs has consistently advertised these historic low pressures, while the wind speeds by the GFS, while certainly intense, do not line up with the projected pressure.  Is it possible to have a storm of such depth but have ""only"" cat 3-4 wind speeds?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 7.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 9/3/2017 at 10:36 PM, TPAwx said:

The pressure outputs from this GFS run are inconceivable.

Expand  

No sh!t!  PW has 879 at 198....TT has it at 880....

And of course we know the issues with the GFS upgrade....but still, the consistency with all the models and their robust low pressure outputs are truly amazing...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/3/2017 at 10:39 PM, LakeEffectKing said:

No sh!t!  PW has 879 at 198....TT has it at 880....

And of course we know the issues with the GFS upgrade....but still, the consistency with all the models and their robust low pressure outputs are truly amazing...

Expand  

Yeah even if they are overdone by 50mb you still looking at a 930ish cane thats 400 miles across.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A large hurricane can have real low pressures and not winds you would expect with those pressures. The larger the hurricane the harder it is for it to really tighten up that inner core. Just like the ice skater effect. You put your arms out more and don't spin as fast. I remember Ike had really low pressure but with its extreme size it didn't have as intense winds as it could

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/3/2017 at 10:39 PM, LakeEffectKing said:

No sh!t!  PW has 879 at 198....TT has it at 880....

And of course we know the issues with the GFS upgrade....but still, the consistency with all the models and their robust low pressure outputs are truly amazing...

Expand  

What kind of sustained winds do you think we could see while it's potentially down at 900 or below in your opinion? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/3/2017 at 10:38 PM, RU4Real said:

Once she gets into central Virginia it looks like the pressure kicks up pretty quickly (showing 979 at 222 hours) and the 10m winds are basically a strong breeze. Still some tropical storm force indicated over the Chesapeake, but the winds inland are all under 35 kts. This run has a really weird look to it.

Expand  

Not buying this track one bit. May hit where it shows but what it does after is nuts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/3/2017 at 10:38 PM, RU4Real said:

Once she gets into central Virginia it looks like the pressure kicks up pretty quickly (showing 979 at 222 hours) and the 10m winds are basically a strong breeze. Still some tropical storm force indicated over the Chesapeake, but the winds inland are all under 35 kts. This run has a really weird look to it.

Expand  

The inland decay rate will be interesting to watch.  I know there was some work done like 20 some years ago to model inland winds for a given storm intensity and speed (I think those maps can be found on NHC site) but I'm not sure if anything newer has come out.  A bigger storm tends to take longer to weaken than a smaller one but there's multiple factors that can modulate, including interaction with other mid latitude systems/baroclinic enhancement.  Fortunately we also have some historic examples to look at if necessary (Hugo, Fran, etc.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/3/2017 at 10:45 PM, SnowGoose69 said:

The bad news is even if this misses the US its now evident someone is getting hit hard

Expand  

Various island communities are going to be facing potential catastrophe based on where they are in the track.  Even with an OTS the FLA and SE coast is going to get pounded for days by swells.  Can't even begin to think what this is going to mean if it makes landfall is the US anywhere near the projected strength.  The surge would be beyond belief.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/3/2017 at 10:46 PM, Buddy1987 said:

What kind of sustained winds do you think we could see while it's potentially down at 900 or below in your opinion? 

Expand  

As stated earlier by others, a large established storm with a large wind field will most likely have winds relatively "lighter" than you'd expect from a storm with such low pressures (low 900's) especially at the higher latitudes...this will inevitably have a rather large eye, (not a pinhole eye which can really tighten the windspeeds... ie increase max winds).

I'd wager that even if Irma gets to near 900mb north of the Bahamas...she may "only" have winds in the upper Cat 4 range...(140's)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/3/2017 at 10:44 PM, StormChaser4Life said:
A large hurricane can have real low pressures and not winds you would expect with those pressures. The larger the hurricane the harder it is for it to really tighten up that inner core. Just like the ice skater effect. You put your arms out more and don't spin as fast. I remember Ike had really low pressure but with its extreme size it didn't have as intense winds as it could

They're definitely not all the same. Hugo was a large hurricane as was Floyd. It really depends on the organization of the eyewall and that surrounding pressure gradient. I am still hesitant about sub 910 pressures being achieved because it is so difficult. However, if Irma moves through the Bahamas sub 920s with high enough surface background pressures against the ridge, the gradient could remain tight and she could definitely be a high end 4 or even a 5.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/3/2017 at 10:46 PM, Buddy1987 said:

What kind of sustained winds do you think we could see while it's potentially down at 900 or below in your opinion? 

Expand  

They might not be as high as you'd think if it's a large hurricane. However, large low pressure cyclones typically have very high IKE (integrated kinetic energy) values. If Irma really does get favorably positioned for right entrance region jet dynamics I could see Irma expanding some while holding a low pressure. If so it might rank among cyclones with extreme IKE values (Isabel, Sandy, Katrina, etc.). That's still a big IF though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/3/2017 at 10:49 PM, Hoosier said:

The inland decay rate will be interesting to watch.  I know there was some work done like 20 some years ago to model inland winds for a given storm intensity and speed (I think those maps can be found on NHC site) but I'm not sure if anything newer has come out.  A bigger storm tends to take longer to weaken than a smaller one but there's multiple factors that can modulate, including interaction with other mid latitude systems/baroclinic enhancement.  Fortunately we also have some historic examples to look at if necessary (Hugo, Fran, etc.)

Expand  

 

When I saw the decay on this model run it made sense, intuitively. Irma would start to have her circulation disrupted by the Appalachians. What I don't know is whether the models account for terrain variables.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/3/2017 at 10:39 PM, LakeEffectKing said:

No sh!t!  PW has 879 at 198....TT has it at 880....

And of course we know the issues with the GFS upgrade....but still, the consistency with all the models and their robust low pressure outputs are truly amazing...

Expand  

12z Euro has it at 923 MB while 200 miles east of Daytona at 192 hours

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/3/2017 at 10:52 PM, Windspeed said:

They're definitely not all the same. Hugo was a large hurricane as was Floyd. It really depends on the organization of the eyewall and that surrounding pressure gradient. I am still hesitant about sub 910 pressures being achieved because it is so difficult. However, if Irma moves through the Bahamas sub 920s with high enough surface background pressures against the ridge, the gradient could remain tight and she could definitely be a high end 4 or even a 5.

 

Expand  

Another issue is going to be a massive system like that with a really low pressures and huge wind field is gonna push one hell of a surge in with it...probably record high where ever it makes landfall assuming of course it does actually come ashore. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/3/2017 at 10:51 PM, LakeEffectKing said:

As stated earlier by others, a large established storm with a large wind field will most likely have winds relatively "lighter" than you'd expect from a storm with such low pressures (low 900's) especially at the higher latitudes...this will inevitably have a rather large eye, (not a pinhole eye which can really tighten the windspeeds... ie increase max winds).

I'd wager that even if Irma gets to near 900mb north of the Bahamas...she may "only" have winds in the upper Cat 4 range...(140's)

Expand  

All previous Atlantic hurricanes with pressures below 910mb have been cat 5. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Latest Vortex Data Message from recon

VORTEX DATA MESSAGE  AL112017
A. 03/22:45:27Z
B. 17 deg 21 min N
  050 deg 06 min W
C. 700 mb 2770 m
D. 82 kt
E. 315 deg 12 nm
F. 048 deg 99 kt
G. 318 deg 16 nm
H. 960 mb
I. 11 C / 3052 m
J. 17 C / 3049 m
K. 12 C / NA
L. OPEN W
M. C20
N. 1234 / 7
O. 0.02 / 2 nm
P. NOAA2 0111A IRMA OB 14
MAX FL WIND 99 KT 318 / 16 NM 22:41:38Z
MAX FL TEMP 18 C 317 / 6 NM FROM FL CNTR
CNTR DROPSONDE SFC WIND 180 / 16 KTS

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/3/2017 at 11:12 PM, Hoosier said:

fwiw, operational 18z GFS is east of almost all ensemble members.

Expand  

Yes.  Here is the mean.  The pressure is much lower than previous runs indicating to me a tighter cluster of ensemble members.  The mean basically rides the FL coastline comes ashore in GA and up through the mountains of NC.sfcwind_mslp.conus.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/3/2017 at 11:05 PM, wxmx said:

All previous Atlantic hurricanes with pressures below 910mb have been cat 5. 

Expand  

 

  On 9/3/2017 at 11:05 PM, wxmx said:

All previous Atlantic hurricanes with pressures below 910mb have been cat 5. 

Expand  

Nice stat.  I think Irma will have some special characteristics wrt pressure/wind relationship.  (If current modeling of "long duration" low pressures through the Bahamas occur)

All models show Irma gaining significant size, thus creating a larger, lower pressure environment, wrt the core....thus with pressures substantially lower than that a normal hurricane (say 100-200 miles from the center) the pressure change over distance from there to the core may not be quite as tight as you'd get with a cane in a higher pressure environment, or a cane that has explosively developed (ie Wilma), thus the wind speeds may be a tad lower than the traditional/normal pressure/wind relationship.

 

Edit:  And I'm talking about Irma when she is north of the Bahamas.....as she approaches them and enters them, I think CAT 5 winds are certainly possible (again, assuming the model outputs of low 900's verify)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/3/2017 at 10:38 PM, RU4Real said:

Once she gets into central Virginia it looks like the pressure kicks up pretty quickly (showing 979 at 222 hours) and the 10m winds are basically a strong breeze. Still some tropical storm force indicated over the Chesapeake, but the winds inland are all under 35 kts. This run has a really weird look to it.

Expand  

I only looked at it in the car in my phone, but it looks like stalls in VA and dissipates. PA's total qpf is only about 1-3 inches

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...