Quincy Posted June 10, 2017 Share Posted June 10, 2017 After an unusually slow stretch of severe weather across the Plains since late May, during the season's climatological peak, changes are likely in the coming days. A modest northwest flow pattern will give way to a vigorous shortwave trough, exiting from the Great Basin into the northern High Plains early in the coming week. Appreciable low level moisture, i.e. upper 60s to lower 70s F dew-points, beneath steep mid-level lapse rates, will support strong instability across the Nebraska/South Dakota vicinity (including surrounding states) through the period. As weak impulses transverse around the approaching trough, isolated to scattered thunderstorm development can be expected each day. Deep layer shear profiles suggests supercell potential and all severe hazards are anticipated. Sunday: Large scale forcing appears to be negligible, as 500mb heights should largely remain steady across the central/northern Plains. Convergence along a nearly stationary front draped from Nebraska into the upper Mississippi Valley may be great enough to support isolated storm development. While this day does not scream anything widespread, it's one of those "sleeper" days that could result in an intense supercell or two. Conditional, yes, but it's the subtle forcing days that can sometimes produce something noteworthy, given the degree of instability and sufficient shear. Monday: Perhaps the most interesting day of the bunch, in my perspective. The upper air pattern is very similar to 6/17/14, based on model progs. (Although it should be noted that the overall multi-day evolution of this year's threat is not the best match from 2014's mid-June tornado outbreak sequence, but nonetheless, similarities are clear for at least Monday.) The most apparent focus for storm development will be close to a surface cyclone over the central/northern High Plains, but storms could develop farther east along a surface front, and possibly south immediately ahead of a dryline, should boundary layer heating prove sufficient enough to locally breach a capping inversion. Tuesday: Another day with elevated severe potential, a bit farther east from previous days, as the system transverses across the northern Plains. Details are less clear with time, given model variability, but one modest limiting factor may be the tendency for the trough to become negatively tilted. Either way, a severe threat should evolve across some segment of the north-central states. Note that while 6/17/14 has been referenced, this thread is not being posted under the expectation of a multi-day tornado outbreak. Still, the pattern looks favorable for at least a seasonably active stretch of severe weather across portions of the region. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CheeselandSkies Posted June 10, 2017 Share Posted June 10, 2017 I was originally focused on the Dakotas, but SE MN is starting to look pretty good for tomorrow. That's a plus in that it's not as far a drive, but a negative in that the terrain is bad along the MS river, and crossing it becomes a logistical concern. 4K NAM wants to plow a big MCS through and SPC seems to agree with that thinking, but then it initiates more discrete cells with strong UH tracks on its southern flank, presumably along the outflow/WF intersection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjc0303 Posted June 10, 2017 Share Posted June 10, 2017 4 minutes ago, CheeselandSkies said: I was originally focused on the Dakotas, but SE MN is starting to look pretty good for tomorrow. That's a plus in that it's not as far a drive, but a negative in that the terrain is bad along the MS river, and crossing it becomes a logistical concern. 4K NAM wants to plow a big MCS through and SPC seems to agree with that thinking, but then it initiates more discrete cells with strong UH tracks on its southern flank, presumably along the outflow/WF intersection. If it is that close to the MCS, then they would likely be undercut rapidly by that outflow.. Better odds at something worth watching will be in the wake of the MCS, should atmosphere recover, or in Nebraska where the cold front may be able to initiate a few storms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quincy Posted June 11, 2017 Author Share Posted June 11, 2017 The morning MCS appears to blow through far too early to amount to much. A conditional severe threat may still exist on the southwestern flank of the remnants of the MCS and/or across the central Plains near the outflow boundary/effective front intersection with a surface low. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjc0303 Posted June 11, 2017 Share Posted June 11, 2017 Monday on the other hand looks potent... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CheeselandSkies Posted June 11, 2017 Share Posted June 11, 2017 9 hours ago, bjc0303 said: Monday on the other hand looks potent... Too far away considering I have to work the next day (and anything beyond about 3 hours away qualifies since work starts at 3AM for me). Shouldn't have taken tomorrow off so I could chase today, but at the time it looked great over SD on the GFS. #2017fail Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinook Posted June 11, 2017 Share Posted June 11, 2017 NAM forecast sounding near Douglas, WY for tomorrow says 3444 J/kg, 243 m2/s2 effective helicity, 59 kt of effective shear. Convection-allowing models show supercells in eastern Wyoming. Models show an increase in SRH and shear from 21z to 00z ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quincy Posted June 11, 2017 Author Share Posted June 11, 2017 11 minutes ago, Chinook said: NAM forecast sounding near Douglas, WY for tomorrow says 3444 J/kg, 243 m2/s2 effective helicity, 59 kt of effective shear. Convection-allowing models show supercells in eastern Wyoming. Models show an increase in SRH and shear from 21z to 00z ! You probably have more objective stats on this, but it appears like the CAPE profiles being modeled are climatologically high-end for the area. Shear is not hard to come by, but 50 knots of deep layer shear plus >3000 J/kg MLCAPE in the CO/NE/WY border area? Such a parameter space can't be very common. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Reimer Posted June 11, 2017 Share Posted June 11, 2017 A shame I can't chase in Wyoming tomorrow, but it really does look quite impressive for that area. Looks like no rental cars are available in Denver tomorrow either! On the bright side at least that means I don't have to debate about buying a last minute flight in from OKC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyhb Posted June 11, 2017 Share Posted June 11, 2017 Looks like a pretty classic upsloping severe event tomorrow with enhanced convergence INVOF the Front Range. Thing that sets this apart as Quincy already touched on is the projected parameter space. The mention of 6/17/2014 intrigues me since I could very well see something like what happened in SE MT that day happen again tomorrow further south (and then perhaps further E along the WF in SD/NE). IIRC, that was a very similar shear/instability combination to some of the forecast soundings tomorrow. 12z CIPS analogs featured a number of events in this region including 6/12/2001, 6/15/1992 (albeit this was generally further E), the aforementioned 6/17/2014, 6/6/1993, 6/10/2004 (Chappell/Big Springs, NE tornado), 6/23/1998 (Columbus, NE wedge), 6/6/2005 and 6/16/2010 (Dupree, SD tornadofest). That's quite a compilation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinook Posted June 11, 2017 Share Posted June 11, 2017 We may even get some storms to develop this evening in the Front Range vicinity and eastern Wyoming. The HRRR has a moderately strong storm over Denver at 8:00PM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattPetrulli Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Long but juicy discussion from NWS Cheyenne ...Widespread Severe Weather Outbreak Likely on Monday...Including Potential for Several Tornadoes...Very Large Hail...and Damaging Winds... Our attention then shifts to what very well could be one of the most significant severe weather episodes we have seen in recent years for southeast WY and the western NE Panhandle. Models have been in great agreement over the last several days w/ a significant upper low over the Great Basin/Intermountain West at 00z Tuesday. The net result is impressive upper-level difluence over the entire area along with sfc cyclogenesis over northern CO. This 992 mb low then proceeds to lift NNE across southeast WY and western NE through the day, which should be a classic track for a potential tornado event. Thunderstorms will become numerous along/e of the Laramie Range by 00z with the help of low-level upslope, excellent convergence along w/steadily increasing large scale ascent. Biggest remaining question is storm mode as some models have trended toward a weak, almost negligable cap with no CIN to be had which could be messy with too much forcing. However, GFS & NAM soundings both show at least a shallow low-level inversion at 5k feet AGL or so which could promote discrete cells early. It also may help that the stronger dynamic support does not arrive until late in the afternoon which could keep early storms from merging too quickly and limiting storm intensity to some degree. By mid/late evening, we expect storms to merge into one or more clusters across east central WY or the northern NE Panhandle. This convection, especially if discrete, will be associated w/a high threat for severe weather. Steep mid-level lapse rates, coupled with strong surface heating is expected to yield a moderately to strongly unstable air mass characterized by MLCAPE over 2000 J/kg. Impressive forecast soundings remain with 0-6 km shear over 50 knots across all of our high plains zones. Very large, curved, and even a few sickle- like hodographs are common along/n of the warm front between 00z-03z as the low-level jet rapidly strengthens with 50 knot flow at 850 mb and resulting 0-1 km/effective SRH over 400 m2/s2. This will support intense supercells with low-level mesocyclones, likely being capable of all facets of severe weather including tornadoes, extremely large and damaging hail, flash flooding, and destructive winds. Any storms which can become rooted in the boundary layer by evening will almost certainly have the potential to produce a strong/violent, long-track tornado given 0-1 km EHI of 2-4. SREF and NCAR Ensembles suggest STP values of 3+ as well, which is impressive. Dew points in the 60s may help promote low LCLs under 1000 meters, perhaps under 500 meters in the early evening. Expect this to support a threat for tornadoes, as long as the storm mode can at least stay quasi-discrete. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinook Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 9 hours ago, Quincy said: You probably have more objective stats on this, but it appears like the CAPE profiles being modeled are climatologically high-end for the area. Shear is not hard to come by, but 50 knots of deep layer shear plus >3000 J/kg MLCAPE in the CO/NE/WY border area? Such a parameter space can't be very common. I checked the climatology for KDNR upper-air soundings. The 3000-4315 J/kg range is the top tier for all CAPEs measured at Denver. (Max of all time might be 4315 J/kg.) Those type of CAPEs only happen in June and July in Denver. By similarity of the foothills/plains topography, this would also apply to areas near the foothills of Wyoming. CAPEs of 3000 J/kg would happen a few times per year in the region of Torrington-Sindey-Scottsbluff-Pine Bluffs, since these are at lower elevations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Martin Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nrgjeff Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Cheyenne Ridge is a nice geographic feature within the broad upslope flow Monday. It can behave similar to the Palmer Divide in Colorado. Speaking of Colorado, CAMs have a big cell on the lifting synoptic front in CO. Storm coverage should be greater in Wyoming, esp coming off the Laramie Mtns. Cheyenne ridge coverage looks in between which may be chaser friendly. Tuesday looks more synoptic vs Monday. Warm front, east of Dakotas surface low, should enter southwest Minnesota which is still good chase territory. CAMs show some storm mode issues, but pattern recognition is at least a few supercells on that warm front initially. Shear and instability are there down into Nebraska and maybe even Kansas, but no quality boundary intersections that far south. CF and DL is always questionable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quincy Posted June 12, 2017 Author Share Posted June 12, 2017 Some regionally impressive observations already, considering it's still late morning MDT: -Upwards of 4000 J/kg SBCAPE in east-central CO -2000 to 3000 J/kg SBCAPE in southeastern WY -67 to 69F dew-points as far west as NW Kansas/SW Nebraska (CAPE based on mesoanalysis) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hlcater Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 GOES 16 has 90 second rapid-scan satellite imagery over WY/CO/NE today. Here is a link on College of DuPage if anyone is interested. http://weather.cod.edu/satrad/exper/?parms=meso2-02-96-0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quincy Posted June 12, 2017 Author Share Posted June 12, 2017 SPC will issue a PDS Tornado Watch shortly for portions of CO/NE/WY. First PDS tor watch on record for Wyoming. 90/80 probs for 2+ tornadoes/1+ significant tornado Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jojo762 Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 12 minutes ago, Quincy said: SPC will issue a PDS Tornado Watch shortly for portions of CO/NE/WY. First PDS tor watch on record for Wyoming. 90/80 probs for 2+ tornadoes/1+ significant tornado Rare to see such a potent setup in this area. Terrain is pretty much ideal for chasing too, road network is meh I'd assume... but should be an interesting next few hours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nwohweather Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Rare to see such a potent setup in this area. Terrain is pretty much ideal for chasing too, road network is meh I'd assume... but should be an interesting next few hours.How is radar coverage in this area Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pbrussell Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 1 minute ago, nwohweather said: How is radar coverage in this area There is enough of a hole between kcys and kudx that it will be frustrating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherextreme Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 PDS watch issued Particularly Dangerous Situation (PDS) Tornado Watch 317 The NWS Storm Prediction Center has issued a * Tornado Watch for portions of Northeast Colorado Western Nebraska Panhandle Southeast Wyoming * Effective this Monday afternoon and evening from 110 PM until 800 PM MDT. ...THIS IS A PARTICULARLY DANGEROUS SITUATION... * Primary threats include... Several tornadoes and a few intense tornadoes likely Widespread large hail expected with scattered very large hail events to 4 inches in diameter likely Isolated significant damaging wind gusts to 75 mph possible SUMMARY...Isolated intense supercell thunderstorms are expected to develop across the watch area this afternoon. Giant hail and strong tornadoes will be possible in the most intense storms. The tornado watch area is approximately along and 60 statute miles east and west of a line from 50 miles north northeast of Douglas WY to 55 miles southeast of Fort Collins CO. For a complete depiction of the watch see the associated watch outline update (WOUS64 KWNS WOU7). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyhb Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 1930z NSSL launch from near Albin, WY is extremely impressive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckeye05 Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Wheatland cell is now TOR warned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pbrussell Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 9 minutes ago, Buckeye05 said: Wheatland cell is now TOR warned. Starting to look pretty healthy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pbrussell Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 That little fart of a cell NNE of medicine bow has a significant couplet. (see 4:05 PM scan) Radar clutter is doing it's job keeping it obscured though. Can't tell if it's an anomaly or what Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckeye05 Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 The two cells near Ault and Nunn are the ones to watch, that is if they don't interfere with one another too much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hlcater Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 The southern most cell looks extremely promising with a very strong midlevel meso, a massive BWER, 50kft+ ET and no interference to the south. Could put down a big one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CheeselandSkies Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 3 minutes ago, NWLinnCountyIA said: The southern most cell looks extremely promising with a very strong midlevel meso, a massive BWER, 50kft+ ET and no interference to the south. Could put down a big one. Not even warned yet and has one of the best hooks I've seen all year. *Edit: There it is, but interestingly they went with a SVR first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jojo762 Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Multiple discrete, tornado warned supercells in progress. This setup should break the 2017 tendency of discrete supercells not doing discrete supercell things, e.g, producing tornadoes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.