jrips27 Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 Sun peeking in and out here in Macon after a heavy shower about 30 minutes ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pbrussell Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 6 minutes ago, Wmsptwx said: We need some of our heavy hitters in severe to weigh in. This one is tough, plenty of precip and cloud debris, going to be touch and go. Where is the usual gang btw? Likely studying the event at hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PowellVolz Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 Plenty of sun in mid and east Tenn this morning. Looks like the precip will stay SE of us. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlatLander48 Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 9 minutes ago, Wmsptwx said: We need some of our heavy hitters in severe to weigh in. This one is tough, plenty of precip and cloud debris, going to be touch and go. Where is the usual gang btw? I would suspect they start filing in late this morning and very early afternoon. It's going to get real busy in a few hours and gonna last til after midnight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santa Clause Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 Good points to both of you. What a difficult forecast for later today, greatly respect those making them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckeye05 Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 13 minutes ago, Wmsptwx said: We need some of our heavy hitters in severe to weigh in. This one is tough, plenty of precip and cloud debris, going to be touch and go. Where is the usual gang btw? Rapid destabilization is already in progress. This is the kind of dynamic system that won't require massive clearing to establish a good EML and surface based CAPE. This event's verification will likely hinge on kinematics and mesoscale features rather than thermo, as its looking likely (and it has been for a while) we will be dealing with a powder keg by this late afternoon and evening. The question is will the winds back adequately and will SRH be sufficient. If anything, these morning storms are just laying down boundaries that could potentially enhance the threat later on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Martin Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 Some clearing noted back towards Tuscaloosa and Demopolis... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santa Clause Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 4 minutes ago, Buckeye05 said: Rapid destabilization is already in progress. This is the kind of dynamic system that won't require massive clearing to establish a good EML and surface based CAPE. This event's verification will likely hinge on kinematics and mesoscale features rather than thermo, as its looking likely (and it has been for a while) we will be dealing with a powder keg by this late afternoon and evening. The question is will the winds back adequately and will SRH be sufficient. If anything, these morning storms are just laying down boundaries that could potentially enhance the threat later on. Now we're talking, great details. Look forward to all of your takes throughout the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calderon Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 Starting to get a little concerned with the activity pushing east from eastern Alabama because that's laying down a nice boundary that'll serve as a focus for potential for any storm that rides it later today. Where will it set up and how far will it mix remains to be seen. I do have connections to another NWS office and they're noticing it as well and is an area of concern. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrwolf1972 Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 12z 3k nam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LovingGulfLows Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 Greg Forbes upgraded his Tor-Con for the general Atlanta area to an 8! He's probably seeing what you guys are seeing in regards in the boundary that the cells later on can ride on from Eastern Alabama west through the Atlanta metro area and western GA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kayman Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 The LLJ is starting to take its role in setting things for a severe weather episode up very quickly. There is reports of breaks in the clouds and sunshine in Tuscaloosa and Demopolis in Alabama, so that is confirming to me the LLJ already at work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LithiaWx Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 About to get round two in west Atlanta. Already experiencing some minor street flooding around here. About to get trained on by line moving out of Alabama.\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
audioguy3107 Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 Most of the convection east of Atlanta looks to miss the majority of the metro to the NW. Looks like everything is really trying to push of to the north now. Keep in mind most of the guidance yesterday had us socked in here until about 1PM......it's possible it's moving north a little quicker than expected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thrasher Fan Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 Should have at least a SVR on that storm crossing the AL/GA line. Rolling down 20 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LithiaWx Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 1 minute ago, Thrasher Fan said: Should have at least a SVR on that storm crossing the AL/GA line. Rolling down 20 Hail signature on it for sure. Not sure why no warning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thrasher Fan Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 2 minutes ago, LithiaWx said: Hail signature on it for sure. Not sure why no warning. Just popped a SVR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kayman Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 3 minutes ago, audioguy3107 said: Most of the convection east of Atlanta looks to miss the majority of the metro to the NW. Looks like everything is really trying to push of to the north now. Keep in mind most of the guidance yesterday had us socked in here until about 1PM......it's possible it's moving north a little quicker than expected. Yeah, that's the "bounce" to the north-northeast I started to see about an hour ago on the GOES 16 satellite data. The lull is about to start very soon in the areas between Birmingham and Atlanta and north of Montgomery... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pbrussell Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 8 minutes ago, Buckeye05 said: Rapid destabilization is already in progress. This is the kind of dynamic system that won't require massive clearing to establish a good EML and surface based CAPE. This event's verification will likely hinge on kinematics and mesoscale features rather than thermo, as its looking likely (and it has been for a while) we will be dealing with a powder keg by this late afternoon and evening. The question is will the winds back adequately and will SRH be sufficient. If anything, these morning storms are just laying down boundaries that could potentially enhance the threat later on. Mmm. Outflow boundaries. Another added level of complexity to the forecast. There's not much doubt if the instability will be there. Models have been pretty consistent there run to run. Cape values are so fat that the lower SRH values may (and likely will be) overcome. I'm so new to forecasting though that I barely know what I'm talking about. Time will tell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
audioguy3107 Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 So what is the general consensus on here, does SPC go high risk on the midday update or not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santa Clause Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 I would think they stay mod at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thrasher Fan Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 I still see a mod risk and a 15% hatch as good place to hold the guidance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonOH Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 With all the staying 15% convo, the SPC is putting out their opinion. http://www.spc.noaa.gov/products/md/md0440.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrips27 Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 Concerning...Outlook upgrade Valid 051443Z - 051645Z SUMMARY...Portions of the states of AL/GA/SC are being considered for an Outlook upgrade -- though the details are still being analyzed. A very notable dry bias is apparent in the latest model guidance, and observational data and previous model runs are being heavily referenced in Outlook preparation. DISCUSSION...GPS PW data are exhibiting a low bias by at least 0.5 inch from parts of AL into GA, which has influenced initialization of the latest numerical weather prediction guidance. Per coordination with the Weather Prediction Center, it appears that related initialization is causing substantial dry biases in model guidance -- extended through the Day 1 forecast period. With an inland influx of rich moisture feeding ongoing intense supercells in southern AL (with dewpoints into the middle 70s), and the around-16.6-g/kg mean mixing ratio per LIX 12Z sounding, and around 1.5-inch PW per Atlanta and Birmingham 12Z soundings, it is evident that rich moisture and related strong buoyancy does indeed extend inland. As such, observational data and previous model runs will play a major role in the consideration for a High Risk upgrade, as the dry bias has influenced the latest model guidance. While an Outlook upgrade is possible, it is not certain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solak Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 Brad PanovichVerified account @wxbrad 3m3 minutes ago SPC high risk upgrade coming shortly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santa Clause Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 Reading it as upgrade being considered but not a certainty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckeye05 Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 15 minutes ago, pbrussell said: Mmm. Outflow boundaries. Another added level of complexity to the forecast. There's not much doubt if the instability will be there. Models have been pretty consistent there run to run. Cape values are so fat that the lower SRH values may (and likely will be) overcome. I'm so new to forecasting though that I barely know what I'm talking about. Time will tell. This is a "wait and see" setup in my opinion. Almost everything is there for a big event, but the hodos/wind profile are rather unidirectional across this part of the threat area, and it will take other factors (already mentioned) in play to compensate for this. This doesn't exactly sit well with me. I've seen events that seem to have it all going for them but end up "underperforming" purely because of the wind profile, so I'm not quite as on board with this setup as some others are. So will these other compensating factors pull through? I have no idea. At least across the southern portion of the threat area, this could be one of those events where we have a lot of cells that aren't doing too much, but one or two end up latching onto a boundary and going nuts. Because the kinematics are looking like they will be mesoscale-driven, I don't expect every single storm to be spinning like a top for when round 2 arrives, at least initially. Maybe i'm just a bit pessimistic from the other two High Risks this year, but I don't know if i'm totally on board for an upgrade to High at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santa Clause Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 1 minute ago, Buckeye05 said: This is a "wait and see" setup in my opinion. Almost everything is there for a big event, but the hodos/wind profile are rather unidirectional across this part of the threat area, and it will take other factors (already mentioned) in play to compensate for this. This doesn't exactly sit well with me. I've seen events that seem to have it all going for them but end up "underperforming" purely because of the wind profile, so I'm not quite as on board with this setup as some others are. So will these other compensating factors pull through? I have no idea. At least across the southern portion of the threat area, this could be one of those events where we have a lot of cells that aren't doing too much, but one or two end up latching onto a boundary and going nuts. Because the kinematics are looking like they will be mesoscale-driven, I don't expect every single storm to be spinning like a top for when round 2 arrives, at least initially. Maybe i'm just a bit pessimistic from the other two High Risks this year, but I don't know if i'm totally on board for an upgrade to High at this point. Glad you brought that up, profile has kinda had me a little tentative on a major outbreak. Basically, like you state it will be a wait and see afternoon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pbrussell Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 2 minutes ago, Buckeye05 said: This is a "wait and see" setup in my opinion. Almost everything is there for a big event, but the hodos/wind profile are rather unidirectional across this part of the threat area, and it will take other factors (already mentioned) in play to compensate for this. This doesn't exactly sit well with me. I've seen events that seem to have it all going for them but end up "underperforming" purely because of the wind profile, so I'm not quite as on board with this setup as some others are. So will these other compensating factors pull through? I have no idea. At least across the southern portion of the threat area, this could be one of those events where we have a lot of cells that aren't doing too much, but one or two end up latching onto a boundary and going nuts. Because the kinematics are looking like they will be mesoscale-driven, I don't expect every single storm to be spinning like a top for when round 2 arrives, at least initially. Maybe i'm just a bit pessimistic from the other two High Risks this year, but I don't know if i'm totally on board for an upgrade to High at this point. I don't think there's anything wrong at all with your reasoning here. I'm on the wait and see boat as well. The hodographs/forecasted wind direction just isn't quite where I think they need to be for a high risk at the moment. But then, I'm not a meteorologist either Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thrasher Fan Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 4 minutes ago, Buckeye05 said: This is a "wait and see" setup in my opinion. Almost everything is there for a big event, but the hodos/wind profile are rather unidirectional across this part of the threat area, and it will take other factors (already mentioned) in play to compensate for this. This doesn't exactly sit well with me. I've seen events that seem to have it all going for them but end up "underperforming" purely because of the wind profile, so I'm not quite as on board with this setup as some others are. So will these other compensating factors pull through? I have no idea. At least across the southern portion of the threat area, this could be one of those events where we have a lot of cells that aren't doing too much, but one or two end up latching onto a boundary and going nuts. Because the kinematics are looking like they will be mesoscale-driven, I don't expect every single storm to be spinning like a top for when round 2 arrives, at least initially. Maybe i'm just a bit pessimistic from the other two High Risks this year, but I don't know if i'm totally on board for an upgrade to High at this point. While I haven't been able to study the previous High Risks this year as much as I'd like, I would agree with all of this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.