Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,881
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Gilzed378
    Newest Member
    Gilzed378
    Joined

4/6 Strong April Storm Discussion & Observations


bluewave

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 284
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 4/5/2017 at 1:35 PM, Brian5671 said:

Jesus.

Expand  

Just in time for the morning commute.

BTW, following the severe threat down South today. Seems that the HRRR is having major issues because of a few down radar sites. Seems as though that model analyzes what's currently going on based on radar and then inputs that into the next run, so I don't know if that will impact the HRRR for our region later tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 4/5/2017 at 3:07 PM, NJwx85 said:

Parts of the Southeast being considered for an upgrade to high risk, interesting that they have mentioned a dry bias on the modeling. Hopefully that lends itself to an epic soaker up here downstream.

MD 440 graphic

Expand  

the key to the soaker up here is that big area of convection that rides up NJ and off the shoreline a bit...where that ends up will be the areas with the rainfall jackpot....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 4/5/2017 at 4:29 PM, Brian5671 said:

12z GFS says congrats Buffalo.  Quick round of rain for us and that's it...does give us an inch or so in a short period of time.

 

Expand  

 

  On 4/5/2017 at 4:42 PM, Brian5671 said:

and CMC has the same dryslot b/w 2 maxes....

 

Expand  

The GFS has an inch + in most areas and it's a much lower resolution than the RGEM and NAM.

It's certainly possible that we do get a bit of shaft between waves, but it's going to be nearly impossible to predict exactly where that's going to occur given the convective nature of the precip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 4/5/2017 at 5:00 PM, NJwx85 said:

 

The GFS has an inch + in most areas and it's a much lower resolution than the RGEM and NAM.

It's certainly possible that we do get a bit of shaft between waves, but it's going to be nearly impossible to predict exactly where that's going to occur given the convective nature of the precip.

Expand  

I'd tend to agree on a surprise either way-big dryslot or a deluge.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 4/5/2017 at 5:15 PM, Brian5671 said:

I'd tend to agree on a surprise either way-big dryslot or a deluge.  

Expand  

Glad to see the UKMET more than doubled it's amounts from 00z and the uniformity and intensity of the precip shield. Remember that a global model probably isn't going to see where the most training occurs with this convection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...