Baroclinic Zone Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 18 minutes ago, SnowGoose69 said: The UKMET looks like it could do something crazy after 72 Certainly not going to escape N with that look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 Methinks the Euro rings some bells in an hour Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morch Madness Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 2 minutes ago, weathafella said: Methinks the Euro rings some bells in an hour I have the same feeling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 8 minutes ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said: Because dry humping models that show snow for your backyard is a win? when it just shat the bed with major leakage. My bad, I forgot this is model mayhem and not neccesarily a logical discussion of how we interpret said models. Carry on then. His post was actually a logical interpretation of what the model was showing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 The upper levels have improved on this the past 48 hours so that's often a good sign for future guidance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 There's little doubt this is coming Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 7 minutes ago, Baroclinic Zone said: His post was actually a logical interpretation of what the model was showing. Lol, you right. I read "cmc" and tossed the whole post just like I toss that model. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 4 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said: There's little doubt this is coming Not this again, I had to take the day off and continue to shovel your forcasted 26". obv I kid, I went 22" ftl. But man, you are always certain in an uncertain hobby. Magician? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 7 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said: There's little doubt this is coming Almost every model has shown the potential for a Saturday storm. we need another day to see what that potential actually is and for who. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 I think its coming, but unlike last event, there will be limit to how far west...and it may very well tick back east late in game. UK looked crazy?No....lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 2 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: I think its coming, but unlike last event, there will be limit to how far west...and it may very well tick back east late in game. UK looked crazy?No....lol. Yea, west zones need alot more earlier diggin, which can happen....but it can also be overdone and correct itself. It's back to climo again, e sne looking good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 1 minute ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: I think its coming, but unlike last event, there will be limit to how far west...and it may very well tick back east late in game. UK looked crazy?No....lol. 1005mb low SE of the BM at 96hr. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted March 15, 2017 Author Share Posted March 15, 2017 55 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said: The April 1987 storm gave 17" to ORH while 25" fell in Princeton. I have a map I made of that storm on my home computer...I'll pull it up later. This storm actually does have the same kind of H5 look but obviously you need the clean organized moisture injection to have prolific amounts like '87. We're not in the same ballpark in even entertaining those yet. That's all I was really after in making the comparison .. It was done so to hone attention to dynamics and how/why we should discount that look .. If we can work with that on 28, April, ...we prooobably can in March - just a hunch. But yes ...the other parameters may or may not leave something to be desired - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J Paul Gordon Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 Perhaps some on this thread might do well with a little anger management course. It's fun to play the model game and even to invest a LITTLE bit of emotion (caps pun intended) into it. But, really, it isn't necessary to smash people in the face. Save that for our esteemed politicians (Republodyte and Dimmyrat, alike); they've earned it. Dudes and dudettes on this board shouldn't be subject to personal slams (or dish them out, either) Just sayin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 Right now this is reading as an inverted trough with the parent low digging out of the GL and the developing SLP offshore. Gonna need more digging to make it something more. And the GEFS at 84hr. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold Miser Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 3 minutes ago, Baroclinic Zone said: 1005mb low SE of the BM at 96hr. Let's just allow our crazy uncle into this weekend's event wearing that low right where he has it and he will be sure to be the life of the party for all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tamarack Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 2 hours ago, weathafella said: I thought the weekend system most resembled 3/17-19, 1956. I remember some incredible drifts with that one. Two feet in NNJ, zilch for the foothills in the 18-19 storm. Saw some runs with central Maine getting near warning-criteria snow for the weekend (unless it's 7:1 like yesterday), but many changes between here and there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 Euro go S? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 2 minutes ago, Baroclinic Zone said: Euro go S? More progressive and never closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 Close but no you know what Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morch Madness Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 bummer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 28 minutes ago, J Paul Gordon said: Perhaps some on this thread might do well with a little anger management course. It's fun to play the model game and even to invest a LITTLE bit of emotion (caps pun intended) into it. But, really, it isn't necessary to smash people in the face. Save that for our esteemed politicians (Republodyte and Dimmyrat, alike); they've earned it. Dudes and dudettes on this board shouldn't be subject to personal slams (or dish them out, either) Just sayin. That would be uber boring and besides, it is all in good fun. If anyone takes words on here seriously, they probably should step away from the internet....it is a cruel place but being affected by it, is a cause for concern in itself. Euro, meh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 7 minutes ago, weathafella said: Close but no you know what It was pretty darn close to something. When I saw 72-78 I thought something was going to blow up off NJ or DE at 84 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 1 minute ago, SnowGoose69 said: It was pretty darn close to something. When I saw 72-78 I thought something was going to blow up off NJ or DE at 84 I agree-wouldn't take much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 Euro is digging things a bit more and also actually partially phasing the backside of today's upper low into the trough...so it ends up a little too positively tilted, but that's plenty correctable with 3-4 days to go. It does give us some snow, but more like the 1-3 nuisance variety. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hazey Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 That's some pretty chilly air set to move in middle of next week. No Braless weather in sight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold Miser Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 5 minutes ago, Hazey said: That's some pretty chilly air set to move in middle of next week. No Braless weather in sight. Speak for yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hazey Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 Just now, Cold Miser said: Speak for yourself. Rock out with your nips out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whineminster Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 5 hours ago, moneypitmike said: Dude, the last one trended east. Lol not really. BOS got less than anticipated. And deform set up father West. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 3 minutes ago, Whineminster said: Lol not really. BOS got less than anticipated. And deform set up father West. Yeah the last storm def trended west...no doubt about it. Some of the mesos maybe got a last little tick to the east at the end inside of12-18 hours...so that places like ORH didn't end up mixing, but the overall trend from like 48 hours out was definitely west. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.