CTWeatherFreak Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 On 3/14/2017 at 3:44 AM, SR Airglow said: That's a good look although doesn't match up with what I'm seeing at the surface - we happily take that though. I definitely overreacted and apologize for that. Expand Isnt that sounding from the 18z run? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SR Airglow Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 On 3/14/2017 at 3:51 AM, CTWeatherFreak said: Isnt that sounding from the 18z run? Expand Nope - 18 hour sounding valid at 18z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomNH Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 On 3/14/2017 at 3:51 AM, CTWeatherFreak said: Isnt that sounding from the 18z run? Expand Oh you're right Will posted the wrong one. The 00z is like +3C at 925 by 18z...lots of rain. ......nah jk it's right. That's sounding for 18z tomorrow not the 18z run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 This thread really needs a title change. The Coast Guard will have their hands full Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 On 3/14/2017 at 3:49 AM, weatherwiz said: no good point...definitely right near 32. snow ratios will blow and snow will be wet but its still snow Expand My biggest concern is precip rates not matching the models. We're relying on getting most of our snow in 6 hours even over the interior. I have to admit that I've never seen a system where the models (even conservative QPF models like the Euro) are spitting this much out in such a short period, so I am putting some weight into it. But I still would lean conservative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSnowman Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 Tell me the town to go to and I'll go. I'll leave at 6am. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROOSTA Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 On 3/14/2017 at 3:55 AM, HoarfrostHubb said: This thread really needs a title change. The Coast Guard will have their hands full Expand I have an idea. "The storm that changed my hobby" Strong boomer passing by as I type. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 On 3/14/2017 at 3:57 AM, TheSnowman said: Tell me the town to go to and I'll go. I'll leave at 6am. Expand New Ipswich, NH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 On 3/14/2017 at 3:56 AM, ORH_wxman said: My biggest concern is precip rates not matching the models. We're relying on getting most of our snow in 6 hours even over the interior. I have to admit that I've never seen a system where the models (even conservative QPF models like the Euro) are spitting this much out in such a short period, so I am putting some weight into it. But I still would lean conservative. Expand Yeah it isn't like it's just the NAM spitting out some hefty QPF values, it's pretty much all models. It certainly is tough to buy into it but at the same time it isn't. I mean models are showing an 80...90...even 100+ 850mb LLJ and 90+ 700mb MLJ streak feeding moisture into this thing...plus it has ties to the Pacific as well. The moisture is certainly there. But you make a great point about how so many are relying on most of the snow in such a short amount of time...this is probably my main reason I can't go like widespread 12-18''+. I've been asking myself, "will we see widespread snowfall rates of 3-4'' per hour for 4-6 consecutive hours? Very, very difficult to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 On 3/14/2017 at 3:58 AM, ROOSTA said: I have an idea. "The storm that changed my hobby" Strong boomer passing by as I type. Expand Some nasty stuff near you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 On 3/14/2017 at 3:59 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said: New Ipswich, NH Expand Savoy Mass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROOSTA Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 On 3/14/2017 at 3:57 AM, TheSnowman said: Tell me the town to go to and I'll go. I'll leave at 6am. Expand Leave now and drive W on 84 just to the NNW of NYC. Spine of the Berks look fantastic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eekuasepinniW Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 On 3/14/2017 at 3:57 AM, TheSnowman said: Tell me the town to go to and I'll go. I'll leave at 6am. Expand Andover, ME Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STILL N OF PIKE Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 On 3/14/2017 at 4:01 AM, Ginx snewx said: Savoy Mass Expand Mentioned Savoy to him last nite at 3am Even mentioned a hotel at 2k w vacancy. You can lead a horse to water... Only prob is 6am is too late to leave for N Berks. More like 4am Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 On 3/14/2017 at 4:05 AM, eekuasepinniW said: Andover, ME Expand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 My JP SNE fetishers Ginxs Giant Winners, GGW MPM,Dendrite PF, Dryslut, Hunchie, Eeks cats and a surprise Ryan and Codfishface Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 I would honestly go anywhere just east of the Berks...that could be an underrated spot for prolific amounts. The degree of upslope should actually be quite phenomenal and if the banding sets up over that area...that's where some 2' totals could happen if they were too happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSnowman Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 On 3/14/2017 at 4:06 AM, weatherwiz said: I would honestly go anywhere just east of the Berks...that could be an underrated spot for prolific amounts. The degree of upslope should actually be quite phenomenal and if the banding sets up over that area...that's where some 2' totals could happen if they were too happen Expand Like specifically? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STILL N OF PIKE Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 On 3/14/2017 at 4:04 AM, ROOSTA said: Leave now and drive W on 84 just to the NNW of NYC. Expand That would be the better choice actually, an area between the poster in Tobyhanna Pa (2k) and Darkstar at 1500' in NW NJ may jack imo around 30" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 On 3/14/2017 at 4:07 AM, TheSnowman said: Like specifically? Expand anywhere between North Adams and Pittsfield...? Pittsfield usually seems to go quite well in these setups if I recall correctly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SR Airglow Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 On 3/14/2017 at 4:09 AM, weatherwiz said: anywhere between North Adams and Pittsfield...? Pittsfield usually seems to go quite well in these setups if I recall correctly. Expand PSF is usually a snow hole IIRC? No doubt they'll do well but if you're chasing I think you can do better. Savoy is a good idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STILL N OF PIKE Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 On 3/14/2017 at 4:07 AM, TheSnowman said: Like specifically? Expand Look at the whitecomb hotel 2100' Florida Mass on rte 2. N Berks crush town It borders Savoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 On 3/14/2017 at 4:10 AM, STILL N OF PIKE said: Look at the whitecomb hotel 2100' Florida Mass on rte 2. N Berks crush town Expand Woodford VT...lakeview motel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 On 3/14/2017 at 4:10 AM, SR Airglow said: PSF is usually a snow hole IIRC? No doubt they'll do well but if you're chasing I think you can do better. Savoy is a good idea. Expand yeah Savoy actually looks solid. Wasn't sure where they were located but just checked. Didn't PSF nail out like 40'' not too long ago with one of these? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 On 3/14/2017 at 4:09 AM, weatherwiz said: anywhere between North Adams and Pittsfield...? Pittsfield usually seems to go quite well in these setups if I recall correctly. Expand PSF is not a snow place for this Savoy or go visit Pete. GGEM is a holla crush job, even warm it still gets most everyone except the Cape to a foot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 On 3/14/2017 at 4:12 AM, weatherwiz said: yeah Savoy actually looks solid. Wasn't sure where they were located but just checked. Didn't PSF nail out like 40'' not too long ago with one of these? Expand Savoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 I must have Pittsfield confused with another location Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STILL N OF PIKE Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 On 3/14/2017 at 4:12 AM, ORH_wxman said: Woodford VT...lakeview motel. Expand I thought that last nite but didnt know if they upslope on this flow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 On 3/14/2017 at 4:14 AM, weatherwiz said: I must have Pittsfield confused with another location Expand You might be thinking of Plainfield...on the east slope of the Berkshires pretty high up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted March 14, 2017 Share Posted March 14, 2017 Can frontolysis be considered like subsidence or is just much weaker (or weakening) frontogenesis? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.