Stormlover74 Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Just now, NJwx85 said: If you think that's terrible for NYC then you need a timeout. It's like 7 hours of sleet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 It just seems way too warm based on the 850 low track Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikem81 Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 2 minutes ago, Neblizzard said: Terrible for NYC and the coast. Not really bad. Precip move in much earlier. Almost 1 inch of QPF by 12Z Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Precip maps look very nice for NYC on the rgem Looks like it changes to rain at the end after a good dumping of snow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swamplover56 Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Just now, Stormlover74 said: It's like 7 hours of sleet That's what I'm seeing too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zelocita Weather Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 RGEM prob verbatim about 10"-14" for NYC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikem81 Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Just now, Snow88 said: Precip maps look very nice for NYC on the rgem Looks like it changes to rain at the end after a good dumping of snow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snywx Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Thats alot of sleet for NYC. LI sees lots of rain verbatim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 It's 12 + for NYC NYC sees snow for several hours than changes to some sleet and rain but at the end Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormlover74 Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 1 minute ago, SnowGoose69 said: It just seems way too warm based on the 850 low track Surface low is over land in South jersey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyblizz44 Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Just now, Neblizzard said: It's terrible in the sense that it hugs the coast and mixes for awhile. I don't need a timeout, I know how to read weather maps. Before hand it's a ton of snow. If it starts to sleet around 11 or noon and we have had 10 or so by then ( and sleet counts as now so say we get 3 as sleet) and then finish up with another 2-4 in snow so be it. That's a historic blizzard in mid march and would actually beat out SuperStorm 93 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zelocita Weather Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 1 minute ago, swamplover56 said: How bout north nj 12-18" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Guys, stop with the bickering. It's ridiculous having to delete all of your posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manny Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 1 minute ago, Snow88 said: I don't get some people on here This run is still 12+ before changing to some sleet and rain. It doesn't seem like rain in NYC proper during the changeover prob all sleet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zelocita Weather Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Just now, weatherfreeeeak said: No more kuchera Kuchera would actually be useful in this case; as it would recognize low ratios/sleet and count that correctly... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikem81 Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Just now, Snow88 said: I don't get some people on here This run is still 12+ before changing to some sleet and rain. Shows 15 inches of Snow followed by 3 hours of sleet. About 1.5 QPF Snow and .5 QPF sleet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 I guess this may join the 1961 and 1993 storms as the only ones to have front enders of 12+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swamplover56 Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 What's also noticeable on the rgem is how bad the lhv does why is that? More compact storm or just more compact precip shield Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USCG RS Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 I guess this may join the 1961 and 1993 storms as the only ones to have front enders of 12+ Didn't we have a front end a couple years back that produced a foot plus? Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 1 minute ago, SnowGoose69 said: I guess this may join the 1961 and 1993 storms as the only ones to have front enders of 12+ The track looks very similiar to 1993 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BxEngine Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 1 minute ago, Blizzard-on-GFS said: Maybe for you it is. This is a whole sub-forum. For many people I-95 and east this is a bad solution with less than 10" of snow when the 0z runs had these areas receiving 15"-24". It's really not that complicated. This is a wintry mess verbatim and not the MECS snowstorm previously modeled. The interior however does great. Its one run of one model. stop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snywx Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 2 minutes ago, Zelocita Weather said: Kuchera would actually be useful in this case; as it would recognize low ratios/sleet and count that correctly... Agreed... If anything those 10:1 maps need to go Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 RPM shows over 15 inches for NYC west and 12 inches east of there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BxEngine Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 STOP CRYING ABOUT THE CRYING, ITS JUST AS UNBEARABLE. POST ABOUT THE STORM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJwx85 Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 2.5" LE for parts of NE NJ, just insane. Easily 25"+ with 10:1 ratios. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IrishRob17 Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 1 minute ago, BxEngine said: STOP CRYING ABOUT THE CRYING, ITS JUST AS UNBEARABLE. POST ABOUT THE STORM. PLEASE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersWx92 Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 The track looks very similiar to 1993No it doesn't, the 1993 storm tracked inland over northeastern NJ. This won't go as far west as that did.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North and West of Town Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 My 2¢ here is this: No matter what happens, this is incredible and gravy and terrific to track and enjoy. Maybe it's because I'm older; living through through the late '80s and early '90s as a kid... there was nothing. There was a snowhole my entire elementary school life, until March 1993 in fifth grade. Enjoy what you have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Breathe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 1 minute ago, RutgersWx92 said: No it doesn't, the 1993 storm tracked inland over northeastern NJ. This won't go as far west as that did. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk This continues to look like 1987 shifted 50-75 miles east Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.