dendrite Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 20 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said: Dendrite smoking Cirrus? Can't wait for the Kuchera maps Dendrite? Not once have I expected a flake from the clipper. I'll probably get another 0.1" squall from the arctic fropa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted March 8, 2017 Author Share Posted March 8, 2017 Just now, dendrite said: Not once have I expected a flake from the clipper. I'll probably get another 0.1" squall from the arctic fropa. You actually might get some from the IVT too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 The hires RGEM is pretty far north Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 18 minutes ago, JC-CT said: The hires RGEM is pretty far north EPS robust across CT EMA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 1 minute ago, Ginx snewx said: EPS robust across CT EMA I think 1-3 is a decent range Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 11 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said: EPS robust across CT EMA This is statewide 2-4" with a narrow zone of 3-6" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 1 hour ago, dendrite said: Not once have I expected a flake from the clipper. I'll probably get another 0.1" squall from the arctic fropa. Same Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted March 8, 2017 Author Share Posted March 8, 2017 NAM looks pretty flat through 30. Worse than 12z even (and that was a southern outlier). Wouldn't be surprised if this run is almost a clean whiff save maybe the south coast. NAM has literally been all over the map the past 24 hours...pretty ugly yesterday at 18z, widespread advisory (or even low end warning in spots) at 00z...a little less wild, but still decent at 06z...suppressed at 12z, and now probably almost a whiff at 18z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Yeah whiffy. Congrats BID. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OSUmetstud Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Ill enjoy my 4" of snow to rain followed by hurricane force gusts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 39 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said: NAM looks pretty flat through 30. Worse than 12z even (and that was a southern outlier). Wouldn't be surprised if this run is almost a clean whiff save maybe the south coast. NAM has literally been all over the map the past 24 hours...pretty ugly yesterday at 18z, widespread advisory (or even low end warning in spots) at 00z...a little less wild, but still decent at 06z...suppressed at 12z, and now probably almost a whiff at 18z. As good as a winter as it's had.. the last 3-4 weeks it's struggled. You wonder if it struggles during transition season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Thankfully nobody pays it any attention, unless it is the snowiest solution obv. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said: As good as a winter as it's had.. the last 3-4 weeks it's struggled. You wonder if it struggles during transition season Maybe it was just lucky throughout and its run its course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 NAM vs the world . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 why are you posting 6z Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, JC-CT said: why are you posting 6z is 12z out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said: is 12z out? Yes, it's similar. Also, why are you posting the JMA lol While you're at it, check out hour 240 on the 12z run Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 rgem is having none of what the nam is smoking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted March 8, 2017 Author Share Posted March 8, 2017 RGEM looks like it gets some inflow going...pretty impressive run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
codfishsnowman Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 maybe the nam had the right idea yesterday but got mixed up today, still could be the first model to forecast heavier snow further north that is another way to think about it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 GFS looks ok considering the source.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted March 8, 2017 Author Share Posted March 8, 2017 1 minute ago, weathafella said: GFS looks ok considering the source.. Slight bump north...so not bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 rgem haha, nice bend back into CT behinds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 RGEM loves our SWCT posters for sure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 I'm telling you ..don't be shocked if they extend the current WSW up to I-90 tomorrow morning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sankaty Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 What's with the TSSN on the KMMK text extraction from the 18Z NAM? Station ID: KMMK Lat: 41.50 Long: -72.82 NAM Model Run: 18Z 8MAR 2017 Cloud base and tops are now agl HR Valid 2m Tmp 2m Dpt 10m Dir 10m Spd TPrcp CPrcp 1000-500 500mb 850mb 500mb MSLP TCC PRS WX Tot Snowfall Vis Deg F Deg F deg kt in. in. Thk GPH Tmp Tmp mb % TEXT Clouds in SM 0 03/08 18Z 56 32 276 9 0.00 0.00 538 549 -1.7 -19.6 1013 2 044FEW098 0.0 15.1 3 03/08 21Z 56 27 223 10 0.00 0.00 538 548 -0.1 -21.1 1011 0 CLR 0.0 15.1 6 03/09 00Z 49 30 205 9 0.00 0.00 537 546 1.2 -22.5 1011 0 CLR 0.0 15.1 9 03/09 03Z 48 29 230 10 0.00 0.00 535 544 0.5 -23.2 1011 0 CLR 0.0 15.1 12 03/09 06Z 45 26 244 10 0.00 0.00 534 543 -1.5 -22.2 1011 0 CLR 0.0 15.1 15 03/09 09Z 43 22 253 10 0.00 0.00 532 542 -3.5 -22.6 1012 0 CLR 0.0 15.1 18 03/09 12Z 41 19 264 11 0.00 0.00 530 541 -5.8 -23.9 1013 0 CLR 0.0 15.1 21 03/09 15Z 43 16 281 15 0.00 0.00 529 541 -8.0 -27.9 1014 0 CLR 0.0 15.1 24 03/09 18Z 45 18 279 13 0.00 0.00 530 542 -6.9 -27.9 1014 0 CLR 0.0 15.1 27 03/09 21Z 47 17 280 11 0.00 0.00 531 542 -5.4 -27.7 1013 0 CLR 0.0 15.0 30 03/10 00Z 44 16 291 6 0.00 0.00 531 543 -4.5 -27.1 1015 2 111FEW145 0.0 15.1 33 03/10 03Z 41 17 311 6 0.00 0.00 531 543 -3.9 -27.7 1015 59 133BKN187 0.0 15.1 36 03/10 06Z 36 25 290 4 0.00 0.00 531 543 -6.0 -26.5 1014 99 -SN 076OVC211 0.0 11.4 39 03/10 09Z 32 30 48 1 0.09 0.00 529 540 -7.4 -26.6 1012 100 080OVC200 0.2 9.2 42 03/10 12Z 32 29 264 2 0.02 0.00 527 537 -10.0 -26.5 1012 100 066OVC283 0.0 7.4 45 03/10 15Z 34 26 283 3 0.01 0.00 524 533 -10.5 -26.6 1011 100 028OVC237 0.0 12.1 48 03/10 18Z 38 28 243 5 0.02 0.00 519 525 -9.6 -31.4 1008 100 022OVC097 0.0 14.1 51 03/10 21Z 37 23 300 9 0.04 0.03 514 520 -9.5 -35.9 1006 94 TSSN 029BKN114 0.0 11.9 54 03/11 00Z 28 7 329 11 0.01 0.01 509 517 -13.1 -37.8 1010 10 110FEW380 0.0 15.1 57 03/11 03Z 23 5 317 13 0.00 0.00 507 518 -16.3 -35.6 1013 0 CLR 0.0 15.1 60 03/11 06Z 20 0 304 13 0.00 0.00 507 518 -18.7 -35.5 1014 0 CLR 0.0 15.0 63 03/11 09Z 18 2 309 12 0.00 0.00 506 518 -19.3 -35.3 1015 0 CLR 0.0 15.0 66 03/11 12Z 17 1 316 11 0.00 0.00 506 521 -20.9 -33.4 1019 0 CLR 0.0 15.1 69 03/11 15Z 19 0 310 11 0.00 0.00 509 525 -21.3 -26.7 1020 5 074FEW088 0.0 15.1 72 03/11 18Z 22 0 298 10 0.00 0.00 513 528 -19.8 -24.7 1019 79 067BKN060 0.0 15.1 75 03/11 21Z 22 0 304 11 0.00 0.00 515 530 -18.9 -26.9 1019 87 080BKN100 0.0 15.0 78 03/12 00Z 17 -1 314 10 0.00 0.00 515 532 -20.5 -27.4 1022 19 170FEW189 0.0 15.1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 That just made my eyes bleed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthCoastMA Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 WSWatch for 4-7" here. NWS going balls to the wall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 6 minutes ago, SouthCoastMA said: WSWatch for 4-7" here. NWS going balls to the wall That's an odd most likely snowfall map given that the watch is mostly east of where they have the heaviest snowfall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbenedet Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Rgem continues to tick warmer at the surface. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.