CAPE Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 32 minutes ago, mitchnick said: Anyone notice the CFS2 lately for December? Slight changes. Lol https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=cfs-mon®ion=namer&pkg=z500a&runtime=2017110412&fh=1&xpos=0&ypos=0 It was way overdue for a shift to something different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 1 hour ago, C.A.P.E. said: It was way overdue for a shift to something different. Or, it's more model support for a shift to a favorable winter pattern, which is what I believe. How about you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAPE Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 17 minutes ago, mitchnick said: Or, it's more model support for a shift to a favorable winter pattern, which is what I believe. How about you? Thats what I would like to believe. Lets see what it does over the next several runs. It has been rock steady with the "bad look" in recent runs after previously flipping around, but maybe it has caught on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AfewUniversesBelowNormal Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 Back to not as favorable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 8 hours ago, StormchaserChuck said: Back to not as favorable. Model hugger! Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aldie 22 Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 9 hours ago, StormchaserChuck said: Back to not as favorable. Let's see who bites Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobalt Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 Looking much better compared to last year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
showmethesnow Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 55 minutes ago, Cobalt said: Looking much better compared to last year One of the things I have liked seeing this fall is the snow cover building in Canada. Think we will have plenty of cold nearby this winter to tap into if we can just get the trough/ridging placement through the CONUS to cooperate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxUSAF Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 Canada is typically cold in Nina’s. Which is why we can get some cold shots, even if things end up warm in the balance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
showmethesnow Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 3 hours ago, WxUSAF said: Canada is typically cold in Nina’s. Which is why we can get some cold shots, even if things end up warm in the balance. True, but I still like to see a good snow pack. Helps to create a deep dense layer of cold that isn't easily scoured out nor do you have the temp issues at mid-levels that quite often occurs with shallow cold. And it seems in recent years it has been a fight to get decent snow pack in Canada. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxUSAF Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 36 minutes ago, showmethesnow said: True, but I still like to see a good snow pack. Helps to create a deep dense layer of cold that isn't easily scoured out nor do you have the temp issues at mid-levels that quite often occurs with shallow cold. And it seems in recent years it has been a fight to get decent snow pack in Canada. Oh I don't disagree. Certainly better than the alternative. I particularly hope the snow pack builds up in Ontario and Quebec. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthArlington101 Posted November 7, 2017 Share Posted November 7, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mappy Posted November 7, 2017 Share Posted November 7, 2017 I got 12" last year, so I will gladly take 18-30" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aldie 22 Posted November 7, 2017 Share Posted November 7, 2017 I'd prefer more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
showmethesnow Posted November 7, 2017 Share Posted November 7, 2017 59 minutes ago, mappy said: I got 12" last year, so I will gladly take 18-30" Talking snow I hope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scraff Posted November 7, 2017 Share Posted November 7, 2017 If we can get started by Thanksgiving, those numbers could be blown out of the water. I’ll certainly take 20, but 12. Meh. Anyway, looking forward to our first big GFS happy hour runs followed by a good NAMing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIC_WX Posted November 7, 2017 Share Posted November 7, 2017 1984-5 and 2005-6 are the analogs mentioned, but the subjective forecast clearly supports the 1984-5 analog in terms of pattern progression. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravensrule Posted November 7, 2017 Share Posted November 7, 2017 2 hours ago, showmethesnow said: Talking snow I hope. Hey now. Stop stealing my job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mappy Posted November 7, 2017 Share Posted November 7, 2017 2 hours ago, showmethesnow said: Talking snow I hope. RR liking this cracked me up more. But yes. Obviously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastCoast NPZ Posted November 7, 2017 Share Posted November 7, 2017 As long as at least a few of those 18-30" come in December, than I will be perfectly happy with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fountainguy97 Posted November 7, 2017 Share Posted November 7, 2017 Good grief the GFS really really wants someone to see snow in late November haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted November 7, 2017 Share Posted November 7, 2017 2 hours ago, RIC_WX said: 1984-5 and 2005-6 are the analogs mentioned, but the subjective forecast clearly supports the 1984-5 analog in terms of pattern progression. The 84-85 analog showed up a long time ago when looking at enso conditions that were forecast. Interesting that it's still there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIC_WX Posted November 7, 2017 Share Posted November 7, 2017 8 minutes ago, WinterWxLuvr said: The 84-85 analog showed up a long time ago when looking at enso conditions that were forecast. Interesting that it's still there. 2005 flipped on a dime in December, from historically cold the first 23 days or so to uninhibited warmth beginning around the holidays into early / mid January. Winter didn't really return until February, and even then it was never quite the same. Pretty sure 1984-5 was the same play, but in reverse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted November 7, 2017 Share Posted November 7, 2017 29 minutes ago, RIC_WX said: 2005 flipped on a dime in December, from historically cold the first 23 days or so to uninhibited warmth beginning around the holidays into early / mid January. Winter didn't really return until February, and even then it was never quite the same. Pretty sure 1984-5 was the same play, but in reverse. Yeah, my memories of the last half of winter in 1985 are good ones. The cold outbreak was incredible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AfewUniversesBelowNormal Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 Models have gravitated toward more -PNA in the medium range. Negative AO/NAO doesn't really show up until after day 10. If verified good, but there can be a lot of changes. Kind of a 5/10 signal on models today wrt Winter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BristowWx Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 23 minutes ago, StormchaserChuck said: Models have gravitated toward more -PNA in the medium range. Negative AO/NAO doesn't really show up until after day 10. If verified good, but there can be a lot of changes. Kind of a 5/10 signal on models today wrt Winter What kind of pattern does a -PNA -AO -NAO usually yield for us? The +PNA -AO/NAO is great but sometimes just gives us dry and cold unless something can dig and turn negative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pasnownut Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 1 hour ago, BristowWx said: What kind of pattern does a -PNA -AO -NAO usually yield for us? The +PNA -AO/NAO is great but sometimes just gives us dry and cold unless something can dig and turn negative. a pattern full of bowling balls, clippers, and the occsionally well timed SWFE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted November 8, 2017 Author Share Posted November 8, 2017 2 hours ago, BristowWx said: What kind of pattern does a -PNA -AO -NAO usually yield for us? The +PNA -AO/NAO is great but sometimes just gives us dry and cold unless something can dig and turn negative. The 60's were loaded with them. Generally speaking, HL blocking and a -PNA is a wintry pattern for the bulk of the conus except for the far SW. It's not a clean pattern for our region but further north loves it. The majority of the years with a -ao/-pna combo reached climo snow in the MA. The short story is a -pna isn't nearly as big of a deal with a -ao winter as it is with a +ao one. That combo is a death knell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowLover22 Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 The 60's were loaded with them. Generally speaking, HL blocking and a -PNA is a wintry pattern for the bulk of the conus except for the far SW. It's not a clean pattern for our region but further north loves it. The majority of the years with a -ao/-pna combo reached climo snow in the MA. The short story is a -pna isn't nearly as big of a deal with a -ao winter as it is with a +ao one. That combo is a death knell. How about a +EPO, -PNA,-AO,-NAO Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted November 8, 2017 Author Share Posted November 8, 2017 35 minutes ago, Philadelphia Snow said: How about a +EPO, -PNA,-AO,-NAO Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Generally speaking, a numerical +epo will coincide with a -pna because of domain space overlap more often than not but certainly not always. Depends on the location of the +EPO trough axis though. If we have a big GOA vortex then the only thing a -AO/NAO will displace is Pac maritime air. If the +EPO trough is centered more over land like AK then it's different because cold air can still build in Canada. I'm not big on using numerical indices for sensible wx. Best to use the h5 height panels because they tell the real story versus numerical stuff. The answer to your question is sometimes it can suck and sometimes it can be serviceable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.