backedgeapproaching Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 On 2/8/2017 at 1:23 PM, snowgeek said: If the far NW band sets up in the Litchtfield Hills into the Eastern Berkshires, Albany might have trouble hitting 2" as subsidence to the NW of the band eats our snow. Looking for a sharper northwest cutoff than what is modelled. If the decade continues as it has, it will be interesting to see how much Alb avg. snowfall drops again in 2020. It's been ticking down ever since I've moved up here as the new SNE snowbelt develops. Expand Not sure where exactly that far NW band will setup, but not thinking more than a few inches from here over to ALB. ALY currently has you in the 4-6" zone. Yea, its hard to imagine that ALB and ORH currently have similar averages, but both heading in opposite directions when the new averages come out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 On 2/8/2017 at 1:19 PM, Ginx snewx said: Oh man Expand Moneypitmeh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STILL N OF PIKE Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 can someone chime in from a meteorological perspective, is that large blob of moisture by hatteras that is moving NE OTS not pushing baroclinic zone out further east? or robbing moisture /leaving less conducive set up for this system tomm am? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 On 2/8/2017 at 1:29 PM, STILL N OF PIKE said: i dont have much confidence in this system nw of a s ct ri south shore and SE line. Expand It's not out of the realm of possibilities for a few more minor tics east and a more wound up tighter precipitation field. I am certainly leaning towards the area from Taunton NW towards let's say Sterling being the best spots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stash Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 On 2/8/2017 at 1:34 PM, backedgeapproaching said: Not sure where exactly that far NW band will setup, but not thinking more than a few inches from here over to ALB. ALY currently has you in the 4-6" zone. Yea, its hard to imagine that ALB and ORH currently have similar averages, but both heading in opposite directions when the new averages come out. Expand When I first moved up here from CT in the 90's ALB averaged near 65". It dropped to just under 60 in 2010, but NWS ALB corrected it to include missing data and it's now sitting somewhere near 61" I get a little bit more up here, but it's still been quiet relatively speaking. Parts of Eastern SNE should really be rocking tomorrow morning. Looking forward to pics! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Modfan Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 On 2/8/2017 at 1:41 PM, HIPPYVALLEY said: It's not out of the realm of possibilities for a few more minor tics east and a more wound up tighter precipitation field. I am certainly leaning towards the area from Taunton NW towards let's say Sterling being the best spots. Expand I would extend that to NW RI, NE CT from Ginxy north to SE Orh county; this area always seems to jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morch Madness Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 NAM should come NW this run Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bostonseminole Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 On 2/8/2017 at 1:58 PM, Morch Madness said: NAM should come NW this run Expand yeah so far at 15hr looks nw.. and a little stronger.. will see how that translates downstream Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SR Airglow Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 NAM looks west, slower and stronger at hour 23. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blizz Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 NAM stronger, more amped, and slightly NW through Hr 18 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STILL N OF PIKE Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 hoping it gets inflow going the 0z play by play sounded like this then it was weaker due to poor inflow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bostonseminole Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 does not seem to translate further west in later hours, looks to come off the coast at a similar spot as 6z but I'm only at 21hr. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 nice inflow on nam. big hit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whineminster Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 On 2/8/2017 at 1:41 PM, HIPPYVALLEY said: It's not out of the realm of possibilities for a few more minor tics east and a more wound up tighter precipitation field. I am certainly leaning towards the area from Taunton NW towards let's say Sterling being the best spots. Expand So I'll be sucking exhaust along with MoneyPitMeh and HuffyDave. As we know, SE MA is the new snow capital of NE --- at least for coastal storms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted February 8, 2017 Author Share Posted February 8, 2017 I'd say the NAM is just coming in a bit slower and stronger than 06z. 996 vs 993 now at 23h just emerging off DE coast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SR Airglow Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 On 2/8/2017 at 2:02 PM, STILL N OF PIKE said: hoping it gets inflow going the 0z play by play sounded like this then it was weaker due to poor inflow Expand I'm toggling it between 0z and 12z and this run looks like it has better inflow already. Also, I know it's a clown map, but WOW! That's a huge area of 3" per hour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bostonseminole Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 On 2/8/2017 at 2:04 PM, Baroclinic Zone said: I'd say the NAM is just coming in a bit slower and stronger than 06z. 996 vs 993 now at 23h just emerging off DE coast. Expand yeah 992 at 24hrs.. looks good, this will be a nice hit unless it scoots east faster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 On 2/8/2017 at 1:54 PM, Modfan said: I would extend that to NW RI, NE CT from Ginxy north to SE Orh county; this area always seems to jack Expand Oh' no doubt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bostonseminole Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 crushed at 27hr 990mb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted February 8, 2017 Author Share Posted February 8, 2017 Looks like noise in the end. Pretty close to 06z run, just a hair stronger and about 10-15mi closer in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 clothes off, socks on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tavwtby Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Definitely slower stronger and a tick NW on the NAm, looking good to rock here tomorrow morning to midday! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WintersComing Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Wow....nice thumping for most of CT through hr 33!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bostonseminole Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 On 2/8/2017 at 2:09 PM, Baroclinic Zone said: Looks like noise in the end. Pretty close to 06z run, just a hair stronger and about 10-15mi closer in. Expand really, I think it's a bit further NW than 10-15 miles, but maybe my eyes deceive me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 That is a crush job for CT into NE MA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 On 2/8/2017 at 2:11 PM, Bostonseminole said: really, I think it's a bit further NW than 10-15 miles, but maybe my eyes deceive me Expand for him, its noise. for folks nw or back west of river, its an improvement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Tblizz will say it's meh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 NAM gets 8" back to the MA/NY border. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WintersComing Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Nam is further NW with the qpf field ,Looks to be better developed, Brings the heavier precip back here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.