Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Wave 2, 1/7-8/17 Discussion/OBS


Rjay

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
6 minutes ago, sferic said:

Does too, too west introduce mixing issues anywhere ?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

not a very scientific reply..but i can't remember the last time warm air ruined a storm for us...after being so used to it for so many years.  sure i have seen many busts but they have been misses or non-developers.  as long as winds remain north of east i think we are fine.

 

sidenote: almost every major winter storm here does mix, hard to remember many great ones without sleet, but it doesn't really hurt the outcome in the big ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SREF going the wrong way for LGA   6", 4", 4".

WPC has NYC at 40% for at least 4".

Cobb Method NAM moved up to 7" but needs a whopping 20:1 ratio to get there.

Cobb Method GFS  has just 2"-3", but had nothing earlier.   Its' ratio is a high 18:1.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CIK62 said:

SREF going the wrong way for LGA   6", 4", 4".

WPC has NYC at 40% for at least 4".

Cobb Method NAM moved up to 7" but needs a whopping 20:1 ratio to get there.

Cobb Method GFS  has just 2"-3", but had nothing earlier.   Its' ratio is a high 18:1.

 

I wouldn't be too concerned about the SREF. The GFS as mentioned will probably be the last to really catch onto the trend. It's almost time to follow models like the HRRR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jm1220 said:

I wouldn't be too concerned about the SREF. The GFS as mentioned will probably be the last to really catch onto the trend. It's almost time to follow models like the HRRR.

I disagree. In this time frame, the SREF has most value, particularly seeing how its more amped mesoscale members behave. If it's shifting east, it's important to note. I certainly trust a NAM/SREF combo right now over the RGEM.

Lastly, the HRRR should be used to model very specific areas of banding 1-3 hours out, certainly not at this range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CIK62 said:

SREF going the wrong way for LGA   6", 4", 4".

WPC has NYC at 40% for at least 4".

Cobb Method NAM moved up to 7" but needs a whopping 20:1 ratio to get there.

Cobb Method GFS  has just 2"-3", but had nothing earlier.   Its' ratio is a high 18:1.

 

Wait for the 21z SREFs. I expect them to follow the western trends seen this afternoon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, mimillman said:

I disagree. In this time frame, the SREF has most value, particularly seeing how its more amped mesoscale members behave. If it's shifting east, it's important to note. I certainly trust a NAM/SREF combo right now over the RGEM.

Lastly, the HRRR should be used to model very specific areas of banding 1-3 hours out, certainly not at this range.

The RGEM is killer at this range! It showing what it is showing is a great sign for the area. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jm1220 said:

Wow. With ratios that could be 10". Snow growth looks conducive in this for 15-1 ratios. 

 

3 minutes ago, jm1220 said:

Wow. With ratios that could be 10". Snow growth looks conducive in this for 15-1 ratios. 

My friend, as I indicated that's an educated guess, I didnt take a look. Apoologies for any misunderstanding

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...