Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,876
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Anbelon
    Newest Member
    Anbelon
    Joined

Wave 1, 1/5-6/17 Discussion/OBS


dmillz25

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 348
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 1/5/2017 at 5:55 PM, danstorm said:

Given their climo, I'd change the word "may" to "almost certainly"

Expand  

It will probably be the biggest snowfall in parts of the Southeast in years. Wilmington, NC hasn't seen a 6" snowstorm since December 1989.

Remarkably, Wilmington had a 8.6" snowstorm on January 13-14, 1912 and a 9.8" snowfall on February 10-11, 1912.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/5/2017 at 5:54 PM, RU848789 said:

In addition to the WWAdvisories being issued for Middlesex/Mercer/Lower Bucks and everywhere south of there in NJ/SEPA/DE, Mt. Holly had a nice updated AFD talking about mesoscale banding.  As people on this board would likely know, with mesoscale banding, pinpointing the heavier bands is nearly impossible (much like convective t-storms in the summer). In scenarios like this, some small areas (like part of a couple of counties) could get 3-5" of snow, while everyone around them could get 1-3" of snow. 

 

 

http://forecast.weather.gov/product.php?site=PHI&issuedby=PHI&product=AFD&format=CI&version=1&glossary=1&highlight=off

.SHORT TERM /6 PM THIS EVENING THROUGH 6 PM FRIDAY/...
930 AM Update...We are in the process of analyzing the incoming
12Z model guidance. Hourly temps, PoPs and Wx grids were already
updated for tonight and are included in the 930 AM ESTF. We
anticipate sending out an updated snowfall map and issue any
winter weather advisories before noon. The 12Z NAM, latest RAP and
HRRRx (which goes out far enough to capture the entire event)
indicate a band of heavier snowfall (2-3") that develops late this
evening near the Mason-Dixon line in SE PA/N Delmarva and expands
northeastward into central NJ overnight. We continue to see a
trend to the northwest with the placement of the mesoscale snow
band. Additionally, the models show a local min in precip between
this leading snow band to the north and heavier precip offshore,
which is where we previously forecast the axis of heavier snowfall
to occur. A period of moderate snow on the western edge of the
precip shield from the coastal low may occur late tonight or early
Friday morning over coastal NJ but it`s still a very close call.
Expand  

Exactly what I was expressing last night. The general snow maps are smoothed out. It's all about where banding sets up. I think it's more like a general inch around the city with 4" in the best banding 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/5/2017 at 6:07 PM, BxWeatherwatcher said:

it's getting there amigo, both waves are clearly west of progged models. baby steps will get us there.B)

Expand  

Very possible however my red flag for this event, is zero ensembles support, the EPS and Gefs are pretty unanimous on a near miss solution, which is right in line with ggem/GFS/nam/euro.... no reason other than staying hopeful to think this thing has what it takes to get out ahead of the energy dropping from Canada allowing for the trough to dig and phase in time to bring it up coast...I'm not sayin it's impossible, I just think it's not gonna happen for anyone west of eastern Long Island... best place to be is ELI, and I think they could overperform, but I think they overperform with wave 1 not wave 2...

 

Also keep in mind single digit dew points, and a very cold air mass, with a progressive flow, and late phase... your gonna need to see some decent DBZ overhead otherwise your LE pours virga 

 

only shot we have is models are wrong on the timing and we get an earlier phase

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/5/2017 at 6:15 PM, UlsterCountySnowZ said:

Very possible however my red flag for this event, is zero ensembles support, the EPS and Gefs are pretty unanimous on a near miss solution, which is right in line with ggem/GFS/nam/euro.... no reason other than staying hopeful to think this thing has what it takes to get out ahead of the energy dropping from Canada allowing for the trough to dig and phase in time to bring it up coast...I'm not sayin it's impossible, I just think it's not gonna happen for anyone west of eastern Long Island... best place to be is ELI, and I think they could overperform, but I think they overperform with wave 1 not wave 2...

 

Also keep in mind single digit dew points, and a very cold air mass, with a progressive flow, and late phase... your gonna need to see some decent DBZ overhead otherwise your LE pours virga 

 

only shot we have is models are wrong on the timing and we get an earlier phase

Expand  

Disagree. 

All models show measurable snowfall from both waves for NYC East and South, not just Eastern Long Island. Just because NYC wont see half a foot doesnt mean it was a whiff. The UKIE, GFS and EURO, our best models, all took huge jumps NW. Yes, not to Ulster County, but the 12z suite puts the coast in the game for an advisory level snowfall. The Ukie gives Eastern LI a warning level event for Wave 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/5/2017 at 6:15 PM, UlsterCountySnowZ said:

Very possible however my red flag for this event, is zero ensembles support, the EPS and Gefs are pretty unanimous on a near miss solution, which is right in line with ggem/GFS/nam/euro.... no reason other than staying hopeful to think this thing has what it takes to get out ahead of the energy dropping from Canada allowing for the trough to dig and phase in time to bring it up coast...I'm not sayin it's impossible, I just think it's not gonna happen for anyone west of eastern Long Island... best place to be is ELI, and I think they could overperform, but I think they overperform with wave 1 not wave 2...

 

Also keep in mind single digit dew points, and a very cold air mass, with a progressive flow, and late phase... your gonna need to see some decent DBZ overhead otherwise your LE pours virga 

 

only shot we have is models are wrong on the timing and we get an earlier phase

Expand  

yeah although the ggem and srefs have started their nudge west in their last few runs,even the euro moved a bit,not a lot but it did go west. 

 

  On 1/5/2017 at 6:18 PM, psv88 said:

Disagree. 

All models show measurable snowfall from both waves for NYC East and South, not just Eastern Long Island. Just because NYC wont see half a foot doesnt mean it was a whiff. The UKIE, GFS and EURO, our best models, all took huge jumps NW. Yes, not to Ulster County, but the 12z suite puts the coast in the game for an advisory level snowfall. The Ukie gives Eastern LI a warning level event for Wave 2.

Expand  

yeah i was just about to get to the part where sst's and baroclinic zone placement plays a big part. usually a evolving low tends to hug rather then out and east. in this case the blocking might be weaker then forecasted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/5/2017 at 7:01 PM, donsutherland1 said:

Comparison of the 1/5 0z and 12z runs of the RGEM. Ratios should be better than 10:1 (probably 12:1 to 15:1 depending on location):

 

RGEM01052017.jpg

Expand  

 it might still get wetter and better yet,each run has upped our totals a bit and my thinking is that it might do better then anticipated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/5/2017 at 8:02 PM, Morris said:

12KM backed off even more. Under an inch for the city tomorrow.

Expand  

The NAM really isn't a model I take seriously. It finds a nut once in a while but it was clearly overdone yesterday with the 3-5" type stuff it was showing on Long Island. 1-2" maybe locally 3" is probably right near the coast and less than 1" in the north and west suburbs. 

It does look better for wave 2 than 12z and that brushed moderate snow on the coast. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...