SouthCoastMA Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 Yea it's minor. James I hope you didn't get your hopes up for 6-12" with this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USCAPEWEATHERAF Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 Storm appears further northwest than 6z runs Bob. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USCAPEWEATHERAF Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 No I still think 1-3" is likely for our region, but 6-12" is worst case scenario. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 Def a weaker 12z nam. Shows a 1-2" type event for SNE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 Just now, USCAPEWEATHERAF said: No I still think 1-3" is likely for our region, but 6-12" is worst case scenario. It's not a scenario unless you're high. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted January 4, 2017 Author Share Posted January 4, 2017 1 minute ago, USCAPEWEATHERAF said: Compared to previous runs Bob yes it is stronger. What the hell are you even looking at. Strong/stronger. They are not used the same. It's not a strong low and it's 1mb weaker looking at the same time periods between runs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 James, please post less, and think and observe more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted January 4, 2017 Author Share Posted January 4, 2017 2 minutes ago, USCAPEWEATHERAF said: Storm appears further northwest than 6z runs Bob. It's not. Baroclinic zone is further offshore than 06z. Quit while you have a chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USCAPEWEATHERAF Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 I think plenty Ray. I see the storm as a more amped up, trough is neutral to negative tilt over BUF. I can post as many times as I need to, to get my point across. I am not expecting 6-12" Scott, I am not crazy, I am expecting 1-3". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 The worst thing that this site ever did was abolish the weenie tags/5 PPD restriction. Same recalcitrant, misinformed individuals promoting deconstructive wave interference within important threads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted January 4, 2017 Author Share Posted January 4, 2017 Here are the 2 run comparisons James. 12z run is on top. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 More realistic than 6z http:// Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 For the luv of god Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted January 4, 2017 Author Share Posted January 4, 2017 2 minutes ago, dryslot said: For the luv of god I'm trying to be nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 LMAO...thank god James isn't a MET, he'd have everyone running for their lives with every storm. James it's weaker than 6z..that's plainly obvious. being weaker May help with Sundays set up???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted January 4, 2017 Author Share Posted January 4, 2017 Let's see what the other 12z guidance shows but by feeling is the NAMs are still too generous with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 The NAM is definitely worse.... but who cares. This is like a C-2" at best Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 13 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said: More realistic than 6z http:// That looks pretty nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 13 minutes ago, dryslot said: For the luv of god lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 Just now, Ginx snewx said: That looks pretty nice Ginxy special there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 1 minute ago, Ginx snewx said: That looks pretty nice The Nam para is also nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mreaves Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 Just now, Ginx snewx said: That looks pretty nice Ha! Look at the weenie spots over Jay Peak and Mitch's 2000' southern VT plot of land. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 Just now, powderfreak said: Ginxy special there. Mood snows are good least an inch would be a win this year down here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 Just now, mreaves said: Ha! Look at the weenie spots over Jay Peak and Mitch's 2000' southern VT plot of land. LES Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 12 minutes ago, Baroclinic Zone said: I'm trying to be nice. I know, I hope the message gets across Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted January 4, 2017 Author Share Posted January 4, 2017 Just now, Snow88 said: The Nam para is also nice wtf is the para NAM? You referring to the 3km NAMX? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 Train wreck. I'd like to calculate the verification snow to JGW ratio. 0.05? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 Just now, Baroclinic Zone said: wtf is the para NAM? You referring to the 3km NAMX? Yes that is the Para ( replacement) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 2 minutes ago, Baroclinic Zone said: wtf is the para NAM? You referring to the 3km NAMX? I believe it is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mreaves Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 Just now, Ginx snewx said: LES Yea, I get that, I just like that it was officially highlighted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.