SouthCoastMA Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 Yea it's minor. James I hope you didn't get your hopes up for 6-12" with this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USCAPEWEATHERAF Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 Storm appears further northwest than 6z runs Bob. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USCAPEWEATHERAF Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 No I still think 1-3" is likely for our region, but 6-12" is worst case scenario. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 Def a weaker 12z nam. Shows a 1-2" type event for SNE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 2:32 PM, USCAPEWEATHERAF said: No I still think 1-3" is likely for our region, but 6-12" is worst case scenario. Expand It's not a scenario unless you're high. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted January 4, 2017 Author Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 2:30 PM, USCAPEWEATHERAF said: Compared to previous runs Bob yes it is stronger. Expand What the hell are you even looking at. Strong/stronger. They are not used the same. It's not a strong low and it's 1mb weaker looking at the same time periods between runs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 James, please post less, and think and observe more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted January 4, 2017 Author Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 2:31 PM, USCAPEWEATHERAF said: Storm appears further northwest than 6z runs Bob. Expand It's not. Baroclinic zone is further offshore than 06z. Quit while you have a chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USCAPEWEATHERAF Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 I think plenty Ray. I see the storm as a more amped up, trough is neutral to negative tilt over BUF. I can post as many times as I need to, to get my point across. I am not expecting 6-12" Scott, I am not crazy, I am expecting 1-3". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 The worst thing that this site ever did was abolish the weenie tags/5 PPD restriction. Same recalcitrant, misinformed individuals promoting deconstructive wave interference within important threads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted January 4, 2017 Author Share Posted January 4, 2017 Here are the 2 run comparisons James. 12z run is on top. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 More realistic than 6z http:// Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 For the luv of god Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted January 4, 2017 Author Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 2:46 PM, dryslot said: For the luv of god Expand I'm trying to be nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 LMAO...thank god James isn't a MET, he'd have everyone running for their lives with every storm. James it's weaker than 6z..that's plainly obvious. being weaker May help with Sundays set up???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted January 4, 2017 Author Share Posted January 4, 2017 Let's see what the other 12z guidance shows but by feeling is the NAMs are still too generous with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 The NAM is definitely worse.... but who cares. This is like a C-2" at best Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 2:45 PM, Damage In Tolland said: More realistic than 6z http:// Expand That looks pretty nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 2:46 PM, dryslot said: For the luv of god Expand lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 2:59 PM, Ginx snewx said: That looks pretty nice Expand Ginxy special there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 2:59 PM, Ginx snewx said: That looks pretty nice Expand The Nam para is also nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mreaves Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 2:59 PM, Ginx snewx said: That looks pretty nice Expand Ha! Look at the weenie spots over Jay Peak and Mitch's 2000' southern VT plot of land. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 3:00 PM, powderfreak said: Ginxy special there. Expand Mood snows are good least an inch would be a win this year down here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 3:01 PM, mreaves said: Ha! Look at the weenie spots over Jay Peak and Mitch's 2000' southern VT plot of land. Expand LES Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 2:49 PM, Baroclinic Zone said: I'm trying to be nice. Expand I know, I hope the message gets across Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted January 4, 2017 Author Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 3:00 PM, Snow88 said: The Nam para is also nice Expand wtf is the para NAM? You referring to the 3km NAMX? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 Train wreck. I'd like to calculate the verification snow to JGW ratio. 0.05? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 3:02 PM, Baroclinic Zone said: wtf is the para NAM? You referring to the 3km NAMX? Expand Yes that is the Para ( replacement) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 3:02 PM, Baroclinic Zone said: wtf is the para NAM? You referring to the 3km NAMX? Expand I believe it is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mreaves Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 3:01 PM, Ginx snewx said: LES Expand Yea, I get that, I just like that it was officially highlighted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.