JC-CT Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 8:47 PM, Baroclinic Zone said: @500mb. Expand I do think we are looking at relatively high ratios, for whatever falls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 8:48 PM, JC-CT said: I do think we are looking at relatively high ratios, for whatever falls. Expand Kuchera method with ratios on the 3k NAM FWIW which ain't much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 NAM has a larger DGZ which would help the fluff. It also has real strong mid level fronto based on the 700mb temp packing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 9:08 PM, CoastalWx said: NAM has a larger DGZ which would help the fluff. It also has real strong mid level fronto based on the 700mb temp packing. Expand NAM gone wild. RGEM will probably have a dusting for most except the Cape and adjacent SE MA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 9:11 PM, ORH_wxman said: NAM gone wild. RGEM will probably have a dusting for most except the Cape and adjacent SE MA. Expand yeah it sucks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 9:13 PM, JC-CT said: yeah it sucks Expand It's actually a lot better than 12z for SE areas. I think BOS gets an inch or two this run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 9:18 PM, ORH_wxman said: It's actually a lot better than 12z for SE areas. I think BOS gets an inch or two this run.Well 12z was literally nothing. The NAM, it is not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 Yeah this puppy's coming Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 9:13 PM, JC-CT said: yeah it sucks Expand RGEM is much better than 12 Z couple of tenths better. Interesting trend on this one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 9:31 PM, Ginx snewx said: RGEM is much better than 12 Z couple of tenths better. Interesting trend on this one Expand I know, 12z was awful. Would have liked to see a bigger shift, but at least it was in the right direction. It's looking good for an inch or two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 9:32 PM, JC-CT said: I know, 12z was awful. Would have liked to see a bigger shift, but at least it was in the right direction. It's looking good for an inch or two. Expand For 30+ hrs out that is a pretty good step towards the NAM, need another push intensity wise to get some instability like the nam to squeeze out a 3-4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 9:34 PM, Ginx snewx said: For 30+ hrs out that is a pretty good step towards the NAM, need another push intensity wise to get some instability like the nam to squeeze out a 3-4 Expand Rgem usually starts low and bangs up each run under 36 hours Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 Usually when the RGEM is on its game, Its had a few hiccups this winter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 Just ignore the GFS. It doesn't show what we want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthCoastMA Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 9:44 PM, JC-CT said: Just ignore the GFS. It doesn't show what we want. Expand Definitely doesn't, unless you enjoy scattered flurries Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hazey Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 The gfs has been a killjoy for both storms since day 1. Doubt that will come around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 9:47 PM, Hazey said: The gfs has been a killjoy for both storms since day 1. Doubt that will come around. Expand Looks like its trying on wave 2 this run, Better then 12z but that's not saying much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Windcredible! Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 12z GFS was good for 1-2" along the coast and had trended nicely from 0z last night. Hopefully the 18z is just a hiccup. Nice to see the RGEM bump a bit north. Certainly wouldn't have my heart set on more than 0.5-1" in CT at this point...maybe some lolli's to 2" in the SE or along the shoreline...and that's being optimistic. Fingers crossed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 9:36 PM, Damage In Tolland said: Rgem usually starts low and bangs up each run under 36 hours Expand lol wut? The RGEM is known for starting low and becomes snowier for all in the last 36 hours? That seems like weenie fodder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 10:28 PM, powderfreak said: lol wut? The RGEM is known for starting low and becomes snowier for all in the last 36 hours? That seems like weenie fodder. Expand Whatever makes him sleep better at night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 10:33 PM, CoastalWx said: Whatever makes him sleep better at night. Expand There's been some humdingers in these threads the past couple days that's for sure lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 10:28 PM, powderfreak said: lol wut? The RGEM is known for starting low and becomes snowier for all in the last 36 hours? That seems like weenie fodder. Expand If you haven't noticed that it makes me wonder how in tune you really are Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 10:39 PM, Damage In Tolland said: If you haven't noticed that it makes me wonder how in tune you really are Expand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 On 1/4/2017 at 10:39 PM, Damage In Tolland said: If you haven't noticed that it makes me wonder how in tune you really are Expand lol you're right, I haven't noticed that the RGEM gets snowier each run inside of 36 hours. Amazing how that happens for everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Valley Snowman Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 Nam looks decent, especially S coast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 What's decent mean..a coating, an inch? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Valley Snowman Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 Maybe an inch or two for you on the NAM. On 1/5/2017 at 2:30 AM, WinterWolf said: What's decent mean..a coating, an inch? Expand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted January 5, 2017 Author Share Posted January 5, 2017 NAMs not tossed in SE MA and CC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spanks45 Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 At this point, I will gladly take an inch or 2 with the cold air coming this weekend. It will at least look like winter for a bit... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 On 1/5/2017 at 2:32 AM, CTValleySnowMan said: Maybe an inch or two for you on the NAM. Expand Thanks! I'll take that and run lol! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.