Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,608
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Mid to Long Term Discussion 2017


buckeyefan1

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 10.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

This cold airmass is largely getting underestimated in my opinion.This is a bitter,dense,air mass that was only dislodged only by a fairly potent wave 1 and wave 2 heat flux pressing it south now.Not a run of the mill cold at all.

MJO supports cold in the Midwest,east and the AO and NAO forecasted sharply negative now.

The nightmare scenario would be someone getting stuck at 24 degrees with moderate rain which could happen if this dense airmass gets entrenched at the surface,depending on WAA and the low pressure track.Then you better hope you have a generator near by.

Just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NC_hailstorm said:

This cold airmass is largely getting underestimated in my opinion.This is a bitter,dense,air mass that was only dislodged only by a fairly potent wave 1 and wave 2 heat flux pressing it south now.Not a run of the mill cold at all.

MJO supports cold in the Midwest,east and the AO and NAO forecasted sharply negative now.

The nightmare scenario would be someone getting stuck at 24 degrees with moderate rain which could happen if this dense airmass gets entrenched at the surface,depending on WAA and the low pressure track.Then you better hope you have a generator near by.

Just my opinion.

It's also very dense and shallow. With most models not showing cad, have to be concerned about the Apps holding the cold air back, by 12-24 hours. Happens all the time, sadly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, griteater said:

^ Good thoughts by all.  Appreciate the write-up and agree Cold Rain

Thanks sir...and you as well.

I also meant to say that I think the 216 pattern is continued in the 240 panels.  I think there would be some stability to this pattern, if it indeed set up:

f240.gif

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SnowNiner said:

That's a great explanation CR, thanks.  I thought the blocking looked pretty good and was enough to give us that confluence, but it looks like all in all it's too far east to do the job.  Dang Mutumbo.  

Lol at the long range.  Take that Mutumbo!! Jordan in your face!!

Thanks.  You don't want the mechanism responsible for the confluence to escape so quickly.  This is why we all too frequently see high pressure race off the NE coast.  I don't think we really know what it's like to experience true, stable, west-based blocking, since we don't get -NAO winters anymore.  It's so important to "anchor" the cold feed into our part of the world.  Jon really likes the -EPO feature, and I understand that and agree with him.  You HAVE to have a mechanism to deliver arctic cold to our side of the world.  But you also need something to keep it in place.  Otherwise, you get the cold shot, warm up, rain out, cold shot, warm up, rain out routine, which we see all the time these days.  The thing you have to be concerned about with west-based blocking is suppression.  IMO, that's something I can live with.

The other way to lock in the cold is with a robust +PNA, which we have seen some of in the last few years.  The thing you have to worry about here, though, is does it set up too far west or east (cutters vs. OTS storm tracks, if you get a storm at all). 

Hailstorm (good points, by the way), posted that the indexes were looking good.  Hopefully, the trend continues there, along with some elevation of the PNA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, mackerel_sky said:

Should we be concerned about the high strength at this juncture? I mean a 1032, is not a blockbuster!

You should always be concerned about the strength of the high!  On that map, its center is too far west.  However, you see the tendency for higher pressure over the northern tier, which is good and which is infinitely better than the Lakes low.  Changes at 500 could yield a better strength and better placement come game time.

10 minutes ago, SnowNiner said:

The back of my mind too is the fact that models have been over emphasizing the SE ridge.  Has that been the case?  If that is true perhaps that could allow the cold to sink further into the SE more than currently modeled. Interesting set up, at the least. 

Very possible, particularly if we get a little better blocking than currently modeled or if the H5 features shuffle around just a little bit.

We're really not very far away at all from a widespread big time winter storm.  But, when you live in the SE, the line between the major league and a backyard wiffle ball tournament often is razor thin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Cold Rain said:

You should always be concerned about the strength of the high!  On that map, its center is too far west.  However, you see the tendency for higher pressure over the northern tier, which is good and which is infinitely better than the Lakes low.  Changes at 500 could yield a better strength and better placement come game time.

Very possible, particularly if we get a little better blocking than currently modeled or if the H5 features shuffle around just a little bit.

We're really not very far away at all from a widespread big time winter storm.  But, when you live in the SE, the line between the major league and a backyard wiffle ball tournament often is razor thin.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kmOWsXDMwqM

Yep. Very odd not dealing with a CAD situation.  Almost no experience so I'm just along for the ride at this point.  Thanks.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, griteater said:

Oh yeah, I always want to see the damming high.  Ideally there's a dual high, one over the Midwest and another over the NE.

On the image, the big polar trough that is centered north of the Great Lakes...ideally, that would be positioned a little more to the SE (even better would be a big blocking ridge to the north of it).  In it's current position, the parent sfc high is stuck behind it in the Pacific NW and isn't able to move to the east in time ahead of the SW wave that kicks out

zkpuva.gif

Snowniner, for comparison, here's the Mar 1983 snow.  Polar trough is better positioned over SE Canada and into the Northeast.  Sfc high right behind it over Wisconsin.  Storm wave is coming out of New Mexico

vxhv87.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SnowNiner said:

^ Wow, thanks Grit.  The PV is set up almost in Maine. Highs in much better position.  Is the H location corresponding to where the PV is located or the orientation of the trough?  

Sfc high will be tucked in behind that polar trough / PV lobe / 50/50 low, whatever you want to call it, in the confluent flow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, FallsLake said:

At hour 108 it looks like the high over SE Montana is a little stronger and there's a little more push of the cold air SE. But lets see where it goes from here.

The two SW's almost phase. If they can phase, this will allow even colder air to flood south and hence cause pressure increases over the northern plains. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...