psuhoffman Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 Just now, stormtracker said: And that's why nobody here should be happy yet..even if it does go boom. I do, however, think this is becoming a legit threat now. Agree with this 100% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windman18 Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 Low is much farther north this run than 18z. On the Eastern kansas/Oklahoma border compared to southern Louisiana on the 18z. At hr 132 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted January 2, 2017 Author Share Posted January 2, 2017 1 minute ago, Ji said: The 00z and 18z difference is lol Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk I don't really think so. They are remarkably similar at h5 with the exception that the energy coming onshore at about 72 hours is much stronger and digs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ErinInTheSky Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 138 and 144 threat is at my doorstep in MoCo. Come on, stay cold, stay frozen, and give us precip! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 Nice hit at 150..cutting it close with thermals tho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 1042 High in Minnesota at 144 hrs looks beautiful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 Yeah, destroyed at 153 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted January 2, 2017 Author Share Posted January 2, 2017 2 minutes ago, stormtracker said: And that's why nobody here should be happy yet..even if it does go boom. I do, however, think this is becoming a legit threat now. I agree but the runs aren't that different. All you got to do is start comparing them at about 72 hours. There's only one glaring difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thanatos_I_Am Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 Yeah, destroyed at 153This is a joke I'm at 144 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ErinInTheSky Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 Ooooo... 150 THUMP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 Just now, Thanatos_I_Am said: This is a joke I'm at 144 it's not a joke. It's a shellacking between 150-156 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 Still going at 162. It's a classic storm for us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thanatos_I_Am Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 Still going at 162. It's a classic storm for usHOW ARE YOU LOADING SO FAST?!?!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 1 minute ago, WinterWxLuvr said: I agree but the runs aren't that different. All you got to do is start comparing them at about 72 hours. There's only one glaring difference. I can agree with this. 18z and 0z really didn't change that much relative to the chaos we've been seeing. Some features did strengthen/dig more..but more or less they all remained in the same positions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windman18 Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 Really solid run. 850s hold and even improve a bit as the storm gets east of us at 156. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ErinInTheSky Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 Wow. Look at the rain rates right off the coast at 162. This has got to be a lot of snow for us this run... cant wait to see the totals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 What a nuke. Thundersnow and stuff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 Still going at 165, lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thanatos_I_Am Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 Wow. Look at the rain rates right off the coast at 162. This has got to be a lot of snow for us this run... cant wait to see the totals.10-14" across the region Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 Well wow....let's get this down to under 5 days. High north is placed beautifullySent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ErinInTheSky Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 TT through 162. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 3 minutes ago, stormtracker said: Still going at 162. It's a classic storm for us Any chance the rain/snow line will shift in 6 days? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ErinInTheSky Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 168 and it's still falling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 Just now, mitchnick said: Any chance the rain/snow lone will shift in 6 days? Nah..it's a lock. We all know that we are like SNE now...solutions from 6 days out hold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 4 minutes ago, Thanatos_I_Am said: Thump to rain? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk No. if you want to be crazy and parce details D.C. Southeast flirts with sleet for a while before going back to snow but this is almost a perfect run. Ideal track. The system is energetic but forced due east under the high and confluence at the perfect latitude. This h5 track is pretty classic. But listen to Randy. It's too soon to be celebrating anything. Plus it's one run. We want to see some support and consistency but this was a great run taken by itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 I can agree with this. 18z and 0z really didn't change that much relative to the chaos we've been seeing. Some features did strengthen/dig more..but more or less they all remained in the same positionsWas referring more to the strength of sw....the change took us from flurries to heavy snow lolSent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thanatos_I_Am Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 Question for all the weenies out there. How do we get that thing to slow down and sit off the coast?Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowman. Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 Still not done at 168 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted January 2, 2017 Author Share Posted January 2, 2017 1 minute ago, stormtracker said: I can agree with this. 18z and 0z really didn't change that much relative to the chaos we've been seeing. Some features did strengthen/dig more..but more or less they all remained in the same positions And that's why this has more legitimacy. The totally chaotic upper level changes aren't there with this. It all hinges on one aspect this time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RDM Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 Wow - 24 messages in 7 minutes and this late in the evening - things are starting to rock..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.