Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

January Medium/Long Range Discussion


WinterWxLuvr

Recommended Posts

Just now, Bob Chill said:

Browser was open on my phone but I was watching the orange bowl. Lol

I have nothing to add. Gfs jumped big with losing wave 1 and much more confluence. Long lead so who knows. Jumpy models cannot be trusted especially beyond their useful range. 

 

Hopefully the gefs shows some consistency.   

that was a terrific orange bowl. All in all a great night for the southeast folks all around 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
10 minutes ago, BristowWx said:

Just popped a 5hr energy in my bourbon.  It's ugly night and I'm in.

Only storm I ever lost sleep on this far out was Sandy. Even last years storm when the H5 pattern had KU written all over it 8 days out. Not worth sweating over at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Bob Chill said:

Gefs backed way off on both waves for our area. Not a good run. 

Eh not great, but not awful. Still some decent hits. Definitely a few more members that dont have much of anything compared to 18z. There are about 5 members with solid events that are misses to the south. I am in the camp that does not believe suppression will be the problem when the virtual becomes reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6z GEFS has a fair bit of similarity with the 0z Euro and EPS, but still has many members with a storm offshore, enough to have some indication on the mean.  Pretty amazing how the Euro and several GEFS members just completely lose the shortwave out west.  Dump it into the Pacific and it's gone forever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WxUSAF said:

6z GEFS has a fair bit of similarity with the 0z Euro and EPS, but still has many members with a storm offshore, enough to have some indication on the mean.  Pretty amazing how the Euro and several GEFS members just completely lose the shortwave out west.  Dump it into the Pacific and it's gone forever.

Sampling, man. Sampling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Overnight runs did something that hurt our chances for the day 7 threat, and it was across the board on all the guidance.   Around day 5-7 the heights out west, especially in the southwest, are higher. More ridging west and so the trough dumps into the east fully. No southeast ridge at all. Hello suppression city. That squashes and washes out the system ejecting from the Rockies that was our storm. But hey some people that were crying about the pna and wanting the trough in the east got what they wanted, congrats enjoy your cold dry week. 

That said the gefs actually keeps things close enough to at least watch for a shift back. We're still way out. EPS mostly supports the op in squashing everything totally.  Both the gefs and EPS still leave the door open to possible events after as the cold relaxes. Often that's how we roll here but we also just saw a pretty major shift so anything after is a bit suspect until we see how this settles in. 

Way out still looks ambiguous but there are signs the pna might want to cooperate more and still signs on the gefs of nao help. EPS is mostly a muddy useless mess in the long range. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WxUSAF said:

6z GEFS has a fair bit of similarity with the 0z Euro and EPS, but still has many members with a storm offshore, enough to have some indication on the mean.  Pretty amazing how the Euro and several GEFS members just completely lose the shortwave out west.  Dump it into the Pacific and it's gone forever.

The biggest problem I saw was the higher heights in the southwest allowing the trough to dig more in the east and squash the se ridge. The vort we were tracking is weaker then coming through the ridging in the west then what's left gets washed out when it ejects out of the Rockies into the suppressive flow in the east. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

The biggest problem I saw was the higher heights in the southwest allowing the trough to dig more in the east and squash the se ridge. The vort we were tracking is weaker then coming through the ridging in the west then what's left gets washed out when it ejects out of the Rockies into the suppressive flow in the east. 

I agree...Trough much deeper in the east in means.  So much for seasonal trends...for now at least.  You called it though with respect to the LR and the SER.  Its not nonexistent but its not completely killing us either.  To me, the pattern looks soooooo close to being beautiful.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

Overnight runs did something that hurt our chances for the day 7 threat, and it was across the board on all the guidance.   Around day 5-7 the heights out west, especially in the southwest, are higher. More ridging west and so the trough dumps into the east fully. No southeast ridge at all. Hello suppression city. That squashes and washes out the system ejecting from the Rockies that was our storm. But hey some people that were crying about the pna and wanting the trough in the east got what they wanted, congrats enjoy your cold dry week. 

This is  a bit silly and overstated. We have had nothing but warm cutters followed by cold and dry with the mean trough out west. I will take a western ridge eastern trough pattern every single time and roll with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, C.A.P.E. said:

This is  a bit silly and overstated. We have had nothing but warm cutters followed by cold and dry with the mean trough out west. I will take a western ridge eastern trough pattern every single time and roll with it.

But your using broad generalities when each setup is unique and involves lots of moving parts. What is the right piece for one car isn't for another.  Take away the ranking AO and NAO combined with the EPO that set up this cold push and yes then we probably would need PNA help. But if you have a displaced PV lobe squashed down into Quebec and a broad longwave pattern ridging out west is just going to be a suppressive pattern. I was arguing with people the last few days that were lamenting that the trough axis keeps dumping into the west. Given all the other factors in this particular setup that wasn't a bad thing. The biggest change last night was to dump the trough fully into the east and you saw the result. Look at the h5 on the last two euro runs below. Are you saying you would take the second (cold dry) over the first (produced a big storm)?

IMG_0075.PNG

IMG_0076.PNG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, PennQuakerGirl said:

So is it unusual for the models to all show something and then not showing it ~12-18 hours later?

Not ops at range but having solid ensemble support for multiple runs in a row and then in one suite the ops and ens nearly drop the entire idea isn't that common. 

It could easily pop back up though in the next few days. But an impressive Houdini act nonetheless

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

But your using broad generalities when each setup is unique and involves lots of moving parts. What is the right piece for one car isn't for another.  Take away the ranking AO and NAO combined with the EPO that set up this cold push and yes then we probably would need PNA help. But if you have a displaced PV lobe squashed down into Quebec and a broad longwave pattern ridging out west is just going to be a suppressive pattern. I was arguing with people the last few days that were lamenting that the trough axis keeps dumping into the west. Given all the other factors in this particular setup that wasn't a bad thing. The biggest change last night was to dump the trough fully into the east and you saw the result. Look at the h5 on the last two euro runs below. Are you saying you would take the second (cold dry) over the first (produced a big storm)?

 

 

I dont disagree that the "suddenly" modeled dumping of the cold over the east messes up this specific set up. It may not be real. Models have a tendency to overdo cold air intrusions that crush waves and shove the baroclinc zone too far south. I was only responding to the bolded part of your original post, which was a broad generalization, and a bit whingy ;)

You do great work here, and its much appreciated, as I have stated before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...