Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

January 2017 General Discussion


SchaumburgStormer

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Hoosier said:

Looks like the potential for a band of a few inches of snow for southern parts of the region.  Would be their biggest snow so far this season.

Wish mother nature would fire a fast ball down the middle.  Us folks in central Indiana are whiffing on these hanging curve balls and sliders at the knees.  :thumbsdown:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 417
  • Created
  • Last Reply
4 hours ago, Baum said:

I'll take the blame for this weather. Got a snowblower for Christmas. My apologies.

Way to go!!

I've actually been blaming my dad.  His old snowblower crapped the bed during the Dec 4th event.  He went out and bought a big, fancy new one with all the bells and whistles.  Been collecting dust since lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, ConvectiveIA said:

Was hoping for a nudge north this evening from this system but that's starting to look like it's not going to happen. Radar trends are sinking to the south and returning to their mostly MO solution.

Yeah it's a pretty lame event.  Top-down saturation will take awhile in this dry air mass, and with precip so light on the north side models may have been overdoing it a bit on the northward extent.  At least it keeps the snowless streak going.  At 18 days now.  May as well see how long we can make it lol.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This cold for the next few days with only a dusting of snow on the ground should freeze up the ground really well. The big cold in December came with deep snowpack so I'm not sure how well the ground froze up with all the snow on the ground. When that snow melted, I saw a few patches of greenish grass so I'm guessing the ground wasn't too frozen. That will change now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, cyclone77 said:

Yeah it's a pretty lame event.  Top-down saturation will take awhile in this dry air mass, and with precip so light on the north side models may have been overdoing it a bit on the northward extent.  At least it keeps the snowless streak going.  At 18 days now.  May as well see how long we can make it lol.  

Strange to observe... Radar up to this point started off somewhat promising (as in hope for a dusting to an inch) but then has of late died off, current echos moved south. But now new 01z HRRR and RAP have done a 180 and jacked up totals in the southern half of the state again... as if to suggest something may redevelop. 00z NAM holds on to it's 18z ideas mostly for this area, which are somewhat lighter than RAP and HRRR's 01z.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Squally morning in the Detroit area. Most places seemed to get a dusting to half inch. I was told we had a whiteout in wyandotte which measured 1.7". When driving home it was literally a mile from my house where it went from heavy dusting to blanket of white, though in true LES fashion the fluff already settled quite a bit. Lake effect always interesting.

4701.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Say goodbye to the infamous DGEX.  Going bye-bye Feb 1st.  Also the NAM will be upgraded.

Here's a statement from NOAA on some other interesting changes starting Feb 1st.  I highlighted a few of the more notable changes, including a reduction in warm-season surface temp bias...

 

Effective on or about February 1, 2017, beginning with the 

1200 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) run, the National Centers

for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) is proposing to implement

Version 4 of North American Mesoscale (NAM) and discontinue the

Downscaled GFS by NAM Extension (DGEX) Forecast System. Changed

include the following:

 

 

- Discontinue all DGEX model output

- Remove legacy NAM products on NOAAPORT and NCEP/NWS servers

- Make resolution changes for NAM nests

- Make major changes to the NAM Data Assimilation System (NDAS)

- Make model changes to convection, microphysics, land-surface

upgrades; frequency of physics calls increased

 

FORECAST MODEL CHANGES

 

 

1) Resolution changes to the CONUS (from 4 km to 3 km), Alaska

(from 6 km to 3 km), and CONUS fire weather (from 1.333 km to 

1.5 km) nests

2) More frequent calls of physics (now every 2nd time step for

all domains); change frequency of radiation updates for the NAM

12 km parent domain from hourly to every 20 minutes

3) Advect specific humidity every dynamics time step

4) Changes to Betts-Miller-Janjic convective scheme to improve

12 km parent QPF bias, especially during the cool season

5) Update Ferrier-Aligo microphysics to improve stratiform

precipitation, better anvil reflectivity, reduce areas of

light/noisy reflectivity over oceans

6) Improve effect of frozen soil on transpiration and soil

evaporation, leading to reduced cold/moist bias during cool

season

7) Radiation/microphysics changes to reduce incoming surface

shortwave radiation; reduced warm-season 2-m temperature bias

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, cyclone77 said:

Say goodbye to the infamous DGEX.  Going bye-bye Feb 1st.  Also the NAM will be upgraded.

Here's a statement from NOAA on some other interesting changes starting Feb 1st.  I highlighted a few of the more notable changes, including a reduction in warm-season surface temp bias...

 

Effective on or about February 1, 2017, beginning with the 

1200 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) run, the National Centers

for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) is proposing to implement

Version 4 of North American Mesoscale (NAM) and discontinue the

Downscaled GFS by NAM Extension (DGEX) Forecast System. Changed

include the following:

 

 

- Discontinue all DGEX model output

- Remove legacy NAM products on NOAAPORT and NCEP/NWS servers

- Make resolution changes for NAM nests

- Make major changes to the NAM Data Assimilation System (NDAS)

- Make model changes to convection, microphysics, land-surface

upgrades; frequency of physics calls increased

 

FORECAST MODEL CHANGES

 

 

1) Resolution changes to the CONUS (from 4 km to 3 km), Alaska

(from 6 km to 3 km), and CONUS fire weather (from 1.333 km to 

1.5 km) nests

2) More frequent calls of physics (now every 2nd time step for

all domains); change frequency of radiation updates for the NAM

12 km parent domain from hourly to every 20 minutes

3) Advect specific humidity every dynamics time step

4) Changes to Betts-Miller-Janjic convective scheme to improve

12 km parent QPF bias, especially during the cool season

5) Update Ferrier-Aligo microphysics to improve stratiform

precipitation, better anvil reflectivity, reduce areas of

light/noisy reflectivity over oceans

6) Improve effect of frozen soil on transpiration and soil

evaporation, leading to reduced cold/moist bias during cool

season

7) Radiation/microphysics changes to reduce incoming surface

shortwave radiation; reduced warm-season 2-m temperature bias

 

Fascinating. Could you, if you'd like of course, explain perhaps some reasons for these changes, or how they might change forecasting accuracy, and why the DGEX was infamous, etc?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s now up to +9° here at my house after I bottomed out at +1° for the coldest so far this winter.  I now have 2.5” of snow on the ground here at my house (last report at the airport was 1”) The low looks to be +2° at the airport of note it has not been below zero officially in GR since February 28th 2015 the last time it reached zero was on March 5th 2015 and the last time it was double digits below zero was February 27th 2015 when it was -11°  While last winter and so far this winter it has not be below zero in the winter of 2014/15 it got as cold as -13° twice and Grand Rapids went below zero 10 times that winter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, ConvectiveIA said:

 

Fascinating. Could you, if you'd like of course, explain perhaps some reasons for these changes, or how they might change forecasting accuracy, and why the DGEX was infamous, etc?

The DGEX was just a longer version of the NAM.  Basically it was on crack and not worth looking at.  

The increase in resolution from 4km to 3km will be nice.  They also did some upgrades to the way the model is computed, so it hopefully will be more accurate across the board.  The NAM had a tendency to be too warm in the summer months, and they did things to reduce the bias regarding 2-meter temps.  Will be interesting to see if it is in fact more accurate later this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, cyclone77 said:

Say goodbye to the infamous DGEX.  Going bye-bye Feb 1st.  Also the NAM will be upgraded.

Here's a statement from NOAA on some other interesting changes starting Feb 1st.  I highlighted a few of the more notable changes, including a reduction in warm-season surface temp bias...

 

Effective on or about February 1, 2017, beginning with the 

1200 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) run, the National Centers

for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) is proposing to implement

Version 4 of North American Mesoscale (NAM) and discontinue the

Downscaled GFS by NAM Extension (DGEX) Forecast System. Changed

include the following:

 

 

- Discontinue all DGEX model output

- Remove legacy NAM products on NOAAPORT and NCEP/NWS servers

- Make resolution changes for NAM nests

- Make major changes to the NAM Data Assimilation System (NDAS)

- Make model changes to convection, microphysics, land-surface

upgrades; frequency of physics calls increased

 

FORECAST MODEL CHANGES

 

 

1) Resolution changes to the CONUS (from 4 km to 3 km), Alaska

(from 6 km to 3 km), and CONUS fire weather (from 1.333 km to 

1.5 km) nests

2) More frequent calls of physics (now every 2nd time step for

all domains); change frequency of radiation updates for the NAM

12 km parent domain from hourly to every 20 minutes

3) Advect specific humidity every dynamics time step

4) Changes to Betts-Miller-Janjic convective scheme to improve

12 km parent QPF bias, especially during the cool season

5) Update Ferrier-Aligo microphysics to improve stratiform

precipitation, better anvil reflectivity, reduce areas of

light/noisy reflectivity over oceans

6) Improve effect of frozen soil on transpiration and soil

evaporation, leading to reduced cold/moist bias during cool

season

7) Radiation/microphysics changes to reduce incoming surface

shortwave radiation; reduced warm-season 2-m temperature bias

Models are already amazing now days, this is a cherry on top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the wind dying down yesterday, lake effect snows have set up shop closer to the lakeshore. 6 inches of fresh new snow since yesterday, and still coming down. With it being cold, driving has been nasty with snow packed on to roads and the powder blowing all over the place..causing very low visibility 

The NAM looks like it is trying to hold the cold air in longer for Tuesday's system, with several inches possible. Hope it happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here IMBY I received 1.5” of new snow overnight. And now have 4.5” on the ground. With the snow on the ground and on the trees and a temperature of 11° and light snow falling it looks very much like winter at this time

 Here are some snow totals from western North Carolina from last night

Totals by county

Buncombe: 4 to 7"

Burke: 6 to 9"

Cherokee (N.C.): 2 to 4"(Valleys), 3 to 6" (Mts.)

Clay: 3 to 5"

Graham: 3 to 6"

Haywood: 4 to 6"

Henderson: 6 to 9"

Jackson: 4 to 6"

Macon: 3 to 6"

Madison: 3 to 6"

McDowell: 6 to 9"

Mitchell: 3 to 6"

Polk: 6 to 10"

Rutherford: 6 to 9"

Swain: 3 to 6"

Transylvania: 5 to 8"

Yancey: 3 to 6"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...