Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Thursday Thumper or Thirst-Quencher


moneypitmike

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
5 minutes ago, dryslot said:

Not at all, Its going the wrong way for many except if you live west it just gets better

I'm still interested to see what happens though. The gradient is going to be tighter than models show...I'm pretty certain of that. So it could still end up decent in some areas that are looking precarious now. We'll have to watch for the typical uncertainties too like convective feedback in a system like this...it's often overused as a weenie term in modeling but it's a very real thing that would be most likely to show up in this type of event. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, weathafella said:

I'm out on this threat for mby.   Good luck NNE!  

My call:  Kevin to Ray:  1-3

ORH-FIT-MHT: 2-4

mpm at this pit: 8-12

dendrite to Mahk: 5-10

pf: 12+

dryslot: 4-8

downeast: 3-6

tamatack: 8-12

 

 

Ditto for here. Not so sure about 8-12 for MPM. Thinking 5-8. OTOH it is a magical place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hubby is probably still under the gun for ORH area. Even ORH perhaps...but the trends haven't been great. Still..I mean 10 miles could mean catpaws or 1/4SM Paste +.  Just too soon to figure out. In general, it's always dicey to depend on dynamics. Even the euro has 0C 950 line back to the NW corner of MA into SNH. I also have noticed a later trend in closing off H7 which is usually not great for those wanting S+....esp in SNE. Hopefully you guys on the line work out for the snowier.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

I'm still interested to see what happens though. The gradient is going to be tighter than models show...I'm pretty certain of that. So it could still end up decent in some areas that are looking precarious now. We'll have to watch for the typical uncertainties too like convective feedback in a system like this...it's often overused as a weenie term in modeling but it's a very real thing that would be most likely to show up in this type of event. 

The Euro holding serve run after run consistently keeps an eyebrow raised that the other models may be having issues with the convection, I know in the past, It doesn't usually end up where its modeled to track because of it, We have seen that many times

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, mreaves said:

Might be ok.  Upper Valley over to Dendrite might be better.  Has been ticking west some though so eastern VT should be good either way but probably not the jackpot zone but still good.

To chase I'd pass Stowe and go to North Conway or Jackson, NH...honestly.  Maybe Bethel, ME?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Hubby is probably still under the gun for ORH area. Even ORH perhaps...but the trends haven't been great. Still..I mean 10 miles could mean catpaws or 1/4SM Paste +.  Just too soon to figure out. In general, it's always dicey to depend on dynamics. Even the euro has 0C 950 line back to the NW corner of MA into SNH. I also have noticed a later trend in closing off H7 which is usually not great for those wanting S+....esp in SNE. Hopefully you guys on the line work out for the snowier.  

The trend of later development and also northwest development is definitely bad for getting a CCB in SNE. 

Hopefully it has over trended slightly and we see sooner development again in the final 24h. That would make a huge difference in that 495 and NW belt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, HIPPYVALLEY said:

GFS has me on the rain-snow line now and you with paste and taint.   I'm more interested in future mesoscale runs at this point. 

I still think it is warning criteria here when all is said and done. 

I'm hoping we can end December with 30".  I think the last time I did that was with the boost of the 24" from Roctober.  That says a lot about how crappy the last few years have been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, dryslot said:

The Euro holding serve run after run consistently keeps an eyebrow raised that the other models may be having issues with the convection, I know in the past, It doesn't usually end up where its modeled to track because of it, We have seen that many times

When does the next Euro run come out? if it holds and ends up being wrong, how often does that happen where it's precision is rock solid for 3 days, then utterly fails?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

The trend of later development and also northwest development is definitely bad for getting a CCB in SNE. 

Hopefully it has over trended slightly and we see sooner development again in the final 24h. That would make a huge difference in that 495 and NW belt. 

It's too bad the GFS has come in even warmer than the meso's.......I was not expecting that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm, I'm still catching up to things this morning after the holidays off. But I'm not loving the inland cut late with the low pressure. I know models can sometimes get carried away with this evolution, but I could see this one being legit.

The PV will be conserved and advect along in the direction of winds at trop level. Streamlines are almost due south as the PV anomaly rounds the corner in New England. It would argue for the surface features to also track in that direction (S to N). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...