Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Thread for 12/14 potential dusting, arctic air, and 12/17 potential slop


North Balti Zen

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 915
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 minute ago, mappy said:

Haha, oops. Tapatalk crashed when I tried posting the first time, hence the second, slightly edited version. Gonna keep them there because it's kind of hilarious

 

1 minute ago, mappy said:

Haha, oops. Tapatalk crashed when I tried posting the first time, hence the second, slightly edited version. Gonna keep them there because it's kind of hilarious

:lol::lol::lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate to go off track and actually talk about the models (:rolleyes:), but I think that the tropical tidbits crew is doing something wrong when plotting the parallel NAM nest (3 km) precip.   The amounts just look unrealistically high, especially for a model whose verification scores have been pretty good.    If you compare the TT precip with precip on the NCEP site (mageval.ncep.noaa.gov), the NCEP plots show much lower and more reasonable precip.

nam3km_apcpn_neus_36.png

nam-hires_conus_036_precip_p36.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, high risk said:

I hate to go off track and actually talk about the models (:rolleyes:), but I think that the tropical tidbits crew is doing something wrong when plotting the parallel NAM nest (3 km) precip.   The amounts just look unrealistically high, especially for a model whose verification scores have been pretty good.    If you compare the TT precip with precip on the NCEP site (mageval.ncep.noaa.gov), the NCEP plots show much lower and more reasonable precip.

nam3km_apcpn_neus_36.png

nam-hires_conus_036_precip_p36.gif

I think they look pretty similar... it is just one is more zoomed in than the other

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, RidingTheModelWithMostSnow said:

I think they look pretty similar... it is just one is more zoomed in than the other

 

    no way.    Look at Michigan.    Most of the state on TT is > 0.5", while only a county or two exceeds 0.5" on the NCEP site.     Similar discrepancy for PA.   And check out the max in southeast NJ:  1"+ on NCEP but 2"+ on TT.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bob Chill said:

@high risk

TT is 3k nam and ncep is 4k. Not sure if that makes any difference though. 

 

 

      Bob, that's just labeling.   There is no parallel 4km nest;  the resolution is increased to 3km in the new version.   The NCEP site has no ability to change the labels on the parallel site without a special implementation, but mageval is showing the 3km nest.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...