My Winter Outlook 2016-17

[Isotherm]

10^th Annual Winter Outlook; For previous outlooks see the following:  http://www.lightinthestorm.com/

Overview of Preset Conditions

The atmospheric/oceanic state in which we find ourselves right now is multifactorial. The super El Nino event last winter aided in inducing a variety of atmospheric tendencies: surged global temperatures such that the ensuing year features an inordinate amount of residual northern hemispheric heat, largely as a function of the excessive latent heat release via prior tropical forcing; the additional, significant injection of westerly atmospheric angular momentum (corresponding to the excessive forcing) precluded the descent of easterly stratospheric winds, thus resetting the QBO into a condition of predominately high westerly shear stress. The enormous latitudinal thermal gradient induced largely by super Nino conditions drove the stratospheric vortex into an insurmountably potent state; however, upon its collapse last spring, the vortex has remained unprecedentedly weak. One may hypothesize that this implicates a repressed vortex status for the ensuing winter, but exogenous indicators suggest otherwise. The ENSO condition is cold-neutral bordering on weak La Nina, which will likely persist for the duration of the winter. SST’s and tropical forcing are reflective of a classic Nina-esque walker cell orientation. It will be important to ascertain the likely modalities and proclivities of high latitude indices, in light of the lesser ENSO forcing (though this isn’t entirely the case). The anticipated behavior of the various global oscillations and their concomitant z500 results will form the basis of this outlook.

 

Examination of Integral Factors

• • ENSO status is cold-neutral to weak La Nina. The vast majority of model guidance maintains the cold-neutral/weak La Nina regime throughout the winter. Whether the resultant situation is weak Nina or cold-neutral, the z500 and sensible weather outcome disparities would be immaterial.

• The oceanic-atmospheric coupling has been relatively weak thus far. SOI daily values have been near neutral or even negative at times – in concert with a strongly heightened angular momentum state – the resultant regime has more closely projected on the climatological El Nino z500 pattern rather than La Nina (at least in the Pacific). The extended Pacific jet is a consequence, with a flood of warm, maritime air into Canada. This regime will experience significant alterations over the coming weeks. The atmospheric coupling response will manifest more robustly as Indonesian/Maritime tropical forcing and rapidly decreasing angular momentum (that is, a removal of atmospheric momentum from the energy budget), will eventually cause the Pacific jet to retract. The more classic low-mid latitude Aleutian ridging and concomitant troughing in the eastern Gulf of Alaska and Western US will develop by late November. The momentum will decrease to such an extent that lower than normal geopotential heights will dominate the northeast Pacific. Inter-seasonal low frequency tropical forcing should congregate in the W Pacific/Indonesian region thus winter – principally within the “domain space” of MJO phases 4-5-6. Large scale subsidence should dominate the dateline and Western Indian Ocean regions, with potentially a secondary, less potent upper divergence area near northern South America. So far this autumn, the dateline eastward in the Pacific – both tropically and sub-tropically – has been largely devoid of 200hpa negative velocity potential, while the inverse has been true to the west of the dateline. All of the aforementioned has implications insofar as Rossby wave driving and mid latitude responses.

• Tropospheric boundary layer conditions thus autumn have been suggestive of a highly perturbed vortex and would – in a vacuum – portend a weak winter stratospheric (and consequently tropospheric) vortex. Both snow cover extent and advance has been quite impressive when juxtaposed with the majority of seasons over the previous 30 years. The resultant Siberian high development and concomitant Taymyr geopotential height anomalies have been robust; namely, higher than normal geopotential heights have generally persisted in that region. The development of certain tropospheric patterns is crucial as often times they will project strongly onto climatological wave 1 and wave 2. The significance of this is that a tropospheric pattern which constructively interferes with vertical wave driving will converge and perturb the vortex.

• As noted prior, the westerly shear stress has persisted in the stratosphere. The westerly QBO strengthened (became more positive over the past couple months. The ensuing winter state will be strongly positive, becoming more moderate late, and likely reversing into the negative state (finally) by spring 2017. Solar conditions have been variable but largely depressed. 10.7cm solar flux values are very low; generally under 800. This will continue or decrease during the winter. Solar minimum with respect to cycle 25 will occur between 2018-2020. Geomagnetic activity (proxy: AP index) min-max cycles are typically lagging that of flux and sunspot numbers. Geomagnetic parameters suggested a decline this summer, but it has been rather active again this autumn.

 

• Precursor sea surface temperatures in the Atlantic Ocean were analyzed for specific trends/anomalies which could be relevant insofar as NAO modality trends.
• Research has demonstrated that there might be a tendency for the development of poleward Aleutian mid-level ridges under a cold ENSO/+QBO regime. The correlation is a strong one. However, I have noted disparities in the recent autumn/current pattern, in terms of atmospheric behavior and forcing which do not project onto the +QBO/-ENSO z500 result. This casts doubt on the notion for a persistent poleward ridge in the Pacific.
• The PDO has been in a predominately positive phase, though declining over recent weeks. The Gulf of Alaska has cooled dramatically due to the extended jet and low geopotential height anomalies. However, the forcing emanating from this region is immaterial, and provides positive feedback at maximum in terms of the ensuing pattern. A more interesting propensity has been the latitudinal sea surface temperature gradient with very warm waters running horizontally across the sub-tropical Pacific and cold waters immediately to the north. This will add momentum to the Pacific jet and aid in precluding, at least in a protracted fashion, significant poleward blockiness. However, the westerly shear stress via the QBO and its connection to forcing modulation may result in a period of such poleward blockiness.
• The AMO has been mostly positive with the western Atlantic warmer than normal. The feedback generated from this will be insignificant compared to the Pacific, but it could aid in intensifying extra-tropical cyclones near the East Coast. Additional available energy increases the likelihood for a reversal in the predominate precipitation pattern from dry to wet across portions of the Northeastern US.
• The sum of methodologies has included analysis of exogenous indicators such as solar, geomagnetic trends/behavior, stratospheric winds, and internal variability of the PDO, AMO, ENSO, tropical forcing, NAO, AO, EPO, PNA (including a relationship I’ve examined which – retrospectively - correctly predicted the NAO modality in 86% of seasons since 1950); prior years have been juxtaposed with the present/recent pattern in attempt to ascertain an extrapolation of this year’s regime. The totality of indicators yields the following prognostication.

Indicator Outlook for DJF mean:

PDO: Near neutral to slightly positive

AMO: Positive

EPO: Positive average; transient periods of negative

NAO: Positive (potentially strongly at times); one month of negative is possible

AO: Near-neutral; favoring early winter for the negative periods, becoming more positive

ENSO: Cold neutral to weak La Nina

PNA: Near neutral; periods of both positive and negative

AAM: Predominately negative/easterly

QBO: Strongly becoming moderately positive/westerly

Anticipated Progression:

In examination of prior years, there were innumerable disparities which made it exceedingly difficult to select analog years. However, the totality of indicators studied yielded the following for closest years:

Primary analog: 1973-74

Secondary analog: 1975-76

Tertiary analog: 1999-2000

There were some notable similarities to 2011-12 as well, though insufficient to utilize it as a higher echelon analog. One will note that all three of the analog years were actually moderate to strong La Nina’s, which differs from the current ENSO state. However, there were numerous other (arguably more important in my view) strongly similar variables. I anticipate a suppressed AAM state, a strengthening polar vortex, La Nina-esque walker and Hadley cell behavior, tropical forcing, which more closely reflects the –QBO/-ENSO years rather than the +QBO/-ENSO years.

December should begin with a neutral to negative tropospheric and stratospheric AO due to the exceptional tropo-stratospheric perturbation. The Pacific will largely be unfavorable with a positive EPO and low geopotential heights amplifying in the Rockies/W US, indicative of a –AAM regime. The NAO could potentially trend negative for a time, combatting the poor Pacific, enabling some troughiness to develop in the C/E US. Many of the analog years featured one month of colder than normal temperatures with more conducive z500 regime. 1975-76 featured a very cold January, and 1973-74 a colder than normal February, and 1999-2000 a colder than normal January. However, there are a number of adjustments that should be performed. There is significantly greater global/hemispheric warmth compared to the 1970s analogs due to the post super Nino conditions. Secondly, the state of the stratospheric vortex is very weak right now, and projected to remain that way through November. There’s a high correlation between November and December outcomes. Thus, I think December is the month most likely to feature high latitude blocking. However, it must be sufficiently significant, especially in the NAO domain to mute +EPO induced Western troughiness. The Southeast ridge will be attempting to burgeon northward. Thus, even early winter, I am conflicted, but given signaling and analogs, December should be near normal temperature wise in the Northeast corridor, with possibly slightly above or slightly below temps. Given the precursor factors and analogs, I expect the precipitation pattern to become increasingly wet across the northern tier and Northeast. I don’t believe it will be sufficient to reverse the drought in the Northeast, but a normal or wetter than normal winter is likely with a warm W Atlantic an active Pacific stream.

January will become increasingly warm with a rapidly intensifying vortex. In the Pacific, the continuance of a low-latitude Aleutian ridge with low heights across Alaska/NE Pacific and NW US should persist. However, periods of poleward Aleutian ridging are possible, occasionally suppressing the Eastern ridge and providing wintry threats. The vast majority of the time, the Atlantic should be unfavorable. Transient blocks are not out of the question. January should be warmer than normal for most of the South and East, with colder weather confined to the Rockies and northern tier.

February should look like a classic Nina-esque regime at z500 and likely in the low levels. An active jet with numerous snow threats across the Mid-west and northern New England should dominate. A continued unfavorable Atlantic and increasingly unfavorable Arctic, coupled with an indeterminate NPAC state could yield occasionally mild to record warm temperatures in the Eastern US. Snowfall will be highly dependent upon transient blocks and baroclinic zone suppression via poleward NPAC ridging. Overall, the month looks warmer than January. Cold weather dominates the N Plains.

In sum, this winter will be colder than last year (not surprising given the record warmth), but warmer than normal across the South and most of the East. Colder than normal departures will be found across the NW US/Rockies and into the Mid-west. The most likely period for a severely cold outbreak, including the East is between December 20^th-January 15^th. If a coupling can occur between high latitude blocking and poleward Pacific ridging, the wintertime source region of cold can expand southeastward. All three analogs featured a period of colder than normal weather in the East. For the most part, the East Coast will be battling milder weather. Precip should be normal to above from the Mid-Atlantic northward, and snowfall normal to below from the Mid-Atlantic southward. There should be more frequent light-mod snows across the North with fewer large events. Bigger events are possible in the Lakes/Interior Northeast with intensifying inland lows.

 

Outlook Temperatures:

For the Local New York City Region:

Dec-Jan-Feb Temperature Departure Outlook: +1 to +2; Warmer than normal

[Expected evolution is near normal December, warmer than normal January, and warmer than normal February].

Dec-Jan-Feb Precipitation Departure Outlook: Near normal (possibly above to the north)

Nov-Mar Snowfall Departure Outlook: Near normal to the north of NYC and below normal from NYC southward

Snowfall guesses for various CONUS locations:

Burlington, VT: 90-100”

Boston: 40-45”

New York City: 21-26”

Philadelphia: 13-18”

Baltimore: 10-15”

Washington DC: 9-14”

Richmond, VA: 5-10”

Raleigh, NC: 0-5”

Atlanta, GA: <2”

Houston, TX: <1”

Chicago, IL: 45-50”

Denver, CO: 60-65”

Seattle, WA: 5-10”

 

 

 

Analogs:

 

 

Primary analog z500:

 

 

 

 

 

[PB GFI]

I am kinda conflicted here part of me wants to say great work the other part wants to choke you. 

However I respect your work and it's noted .

Great  good job as usual Tom.

[blizzardof96]

The most reasonable outlook i've seen so far--especially given the recent trend in seasonal modelling for the DJF z500 pattern. Very well done.

[uncle W]

good luck...Not what most of us want to hear...the analogs did have one good month each year...1973-74 had the most snow and ice...1999-00 had the coldest period mid January to mid February...the 30 days averaged 26.2 but the other 60 days averaged 41.2...1975-76 had a 30 day period of 27.1 from early January to early February...the other 60 days averaged 38.1...1973-74's coldest 30 days was 32.3 in February...the rest of the winter averaged 37.1...no crippling snowstorms...average snowfall is 18.8"...1973-74 had a significant snow or ice storm in Dec,Jan,Feb,Mar...75-76 in Feb, Mar...1999-00 in January...1999 had a very slow start...1975 had snow on Christmas day and a few days before...1973 had a major ice storm in December...1999 didn't have any measurable snowfall in NYC until after mid January...I went with weaker la nina or negative years...If the la nina gets stronger than forecast my analogs will have to be tossed...

winter..........ave temp......min...coldest 30 days/snowfall/4" snowfalls...

1973-74..........35.5............6........32.3............23.5".......4.7"...6.0"...

1975-76..........34.4...........-1........27.1............15.5".......4.2"...4.0"...

1999-00..........36.2............3........26.2............16.3".......5.5"...

[Animal]

nice write up. Looks solid imop.

 

[nesussxwx]

Nice write up 

[doncat]

Great work as usual Tom...With the persistence of the pattern, I have to agree with many of your findings, however I do see some hopes for a more overall change that could lead to a more colder and snowier look...time will tell.

[snywx]

As always nice write up Tom! After last years disaster of a winter Ill take my average of 50-52" up this way.

[IrishRob17]

9 minutes ago, snywx said:

As always nice write up Tom! After last years disaster of a winter Ill take an average of 50-52" up this way.

Yeah, I haven't had to shovel my driveway since 2015, average snowfall will be a win. 

[snowman19]

Great writeup! I too don't think we see a very cooperative Pacific this time around. I feel very confident in an overall -PNA winter and I very seriously doubt a predominant, sustained -EPO and -WPO this winter as well

[Allsnow]

Great work Tom! Thanks for posting. 

[40/70 Benchmark]

We agree on a lot of things, but the primary difference is regard to the NAO, as you are more hostile than I in that regard. I mentioned the same period for the most servere winter weather...from just prior to Christmas in to the first portion of January. Storminess, especially north, is a common theme, as well.

Our snowfall is similar.

Great job.

[Isotherm]

20 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

We agree on a lot of things, but the primary difference is regard to the NAO, as you are more hostile than I in that regard. I mentioned the same period for the most servere winter weather...from just prior to Christmas in to the first portion of January. Storminess, especially north, is a common theme, as well.

Our snowfall is similar.

Great job.

 

 

Thanks everyone! Ray, thanks for the comments, and I just finished reading through yours. Great work. I can tell you put quite a bit of time into this (as is true for both of us probably -- this is my favorite time of year in terms of weather forecasting). I'm a bit warmer and less snowy in totality, but a lot of similarities like you said. I think the period mid Dec-early Jan, for the first time in several years, could be potentially interesting and wintry. I'm favoring a more robust reversal once to January. But it will be interesting to see how many of these conflicting factors play out this winter. Either way, I don't think we need to worry about a +15 month this winter to destroy our DJF means! 

[40/70 Benchmark]

We could see a '95-'96 lite from mid December through early January.

[psv88]

Good write up Tom.

[Isotherm]

19 hours ago, psv88 said:

Good write up Tom.

 

Thanks.

[nzucker]

Tom, enormous respect for your hard work and forecasting ability. The problem with this year's outlook is nothing pops out at you like last year's strong Nino did. That screamed major warmth with a significant coastal bomb. 

It looks to me as if you went very traditionally Nina here, ...73-74 is the strongest La Nina in modern records. 99-00 was also a very potent La Nina. I think we could be a little colder/snowier given the Nina is weaker. 

Why didn't you consider 2010-11 as an analog? It came after a strong Nino, had a cold blocky December, followed by a more traditional Nina look with a SE ridge in February that benefited New England. You think the -NAO/-EPO will be harder to come by this season?

A lot of people are talking about a cold active March like 1967, 1996, 2015. what do you think?

 

 

[Isotherm]

6 hours ago, nzucker said:

Tom, enormous respect for your hard work and forecasting ability. The problem with this year's outlook is nothing pops out at you like last year's strong Nino did. That screamed major warmth with a significant coastal bomb. 

It looks to me as if you went very traditionally Nina here, ...73-74 is the strongest La Nina in modern records. 99-00 was also a very potent La Nina. I think we could be a little colder/snowier given the Nina is weaker. 

Why didn't you consider 2010-11 as an analog? It came after a strong Nino, had a cold blocky December, followed by a more traditional Nina look with a SE ridge in February that benefited New England. You think the -NAO/-EPO will be harder to come by this season?

A lot of people are talking about a cold active March like 1967, 1996, 2015. what do you think?

 

 

 

Thanks for the nice comments. Yeah - this year, honestly, I relied very little on the official ENSO state, as you can see by the analogs. Hopefully this won't end up being detrimental to the forecast; I don't believe it will be. Examining the overall hemispheric / global atmospheric regime and forcing tendencies, the preset pattern more closely resembles a fairly robust Nina in my opinion. I think we'll see a low / mid latitude Aleutian ridge with a generally unfavorable Pacific for the bulk of the winter. I am anticipating a blocky December due largely to recent stratospheric trends, but this year is quite a bit different than 2010-11 insofar as our progression through the solar cycle as well as other factors hemispherically which aren't conducive for protracted blocking. As I mentioned in the outlook too, there is solid research available suggestive of more poleward Aleutian ridging via QBO modulation of ENSO, but I somewhat went against the grain wrt that correlation due to disparities I noted in the precursor patterns this autumn, especially over the tropics.

To be honest, I haven't thought too in depth about March, but my expectation for vortex progression is weak-->strengthening mid winter, then weakening by late Feb/early March, so I can definitely see the argument for a colder March following a rather benign second half of the winter. Two of my three analogs flipped the AO back negative for March as well. So if I had to guess, I think March will probably be closer to normal or possibly below. I was also hesitant to go below normal due to the exceptionally warm background conditions vs virtually every year in recent decades. The pattern will need to be very favorable to focus the cold on our side of the globe (another issue).

[snowman19]

17 minutes ago, Isotherm said:

 

Thanks for the nice comments. Yeah - this year, honestly, I relied very little on the official ENSO state, as you can see by the analogs. Hopefully this won't end up being detrimental to the forecast; I don't believe it will be. Examining the overall hemispheric / global atmospheric regime and forcing tendencies, the preset pattern more closely resembles a fairly robust Nina in my opinion. I think we'll see a low / mid latitude Aleutian ridge with a generally unfavorable Pacific for the bulk of the winter. I am anticipating a blocky December due largely to recent stratospheric trends, but this year is quite a bit different than 2010-11 insofar as our progression through the solar cycle as well as other factors hemispherically which aren't conducive for protracted blocking. As I mentioned in the outlook too, there is solid research available suggestive of more poleward Aleutian ridging via QBO modulation of ENSO, but I somewhat went against the grain wrt that correlation due to disparities I noted in the precursor patterns this autumn, especially over the tropics.

To be honest, I haven't thought too in depth about March, but my expectation for vortex progression is weak-->strengthening mid winter, then weakening by late Feb/early March, so I can definitely see the argument for a colder March following a rather benign second half of the winter. Two of my three analogs flipped the AO back negative for March as well. So if I had to guess, I think March will probably be closer to normal or possibly below. I was also hesitant to go below normal due to the exceptionally warm background conditions vs virtually every year in recent decades. The pattern will need to be very favorable to focus the cold on our side of the globe (another issue).

I don't know why some are insisting that the arctic cold is definitely coming to our side of the globe. It's not a given and could very easily stay in Eurasia this winter. There are signs that a positive feedback has started in that region and if that's the case it only bolsters that argument 

[nzucker]

Tom, the low latitude Aleutian ridge is a feature we've seen in the warmer La Nina winters like 98-99 and 99-00. Whenever the ridge fails to move poleward, it creates a powerful GoA low and forces mild PAC air into the CONUS. The colder Nina winters have had a poleward Aleutian ridge like 10-11. I believe 73-74 fell somewhere in the middle WRT temperature anomalies. Big ice storm in Dec 73, as well.

[uncle W]

recent years featured a cold March in 2013, 2014, 2015...2013 and 2015 were snowy by March standards...2014 had storms that hit the DCA area...2010, 2012, 2016 were the opposite...

[Isotherm]

On 11/18/2016 at 1:47 PM, nzucker said:

Tom, the low latitude Aleutian ridge is a feature we've seen in the warmer La Nina winters like 98-99 and 99-00. Whenever the ridge fails to move poleward, it creates a powerful GoA low and forces mild PAC air into the CONUS. The colder Nina winters have had a poleward Aleutian ridge like 10-11. I believe 73-74 fell somewhere in the middle WRT temperature anomalies. Big ice storm in Dec 73, as well.

 

Yeah, 73-74 had some poleward periods and the AO finished near neutral. I don't think it's a shut out winter ala 11-12, more mediocre overall w/ totals slightly BN. Your area could do better N of NYC. I actually think the mid dec-early jan period could 'potentially' be fun as noted in the outlook.

[nzucker]

7 hours ago, Isotherm said:

 

Yeah, 73-74 had some poleward periods and the AO finished near neutral. I don't think it's a shut out winter ala 11-12, more mediocre overall w/ totals slightly BN. Your area could do better N of NYC. I actually think the mid dec-early jan period could 'potentially' be fun as noted in the outlook.

73-74 was a pretty average winter here with snowfall just exceeding 30"...there was a big ice storm in December as noted by quite a few posters. The winter had a prominent SE ridge that led to a lot of rain/mix/ice events. Are you anticipating a lot of mixed precipitation/changeover events this winter like that year? Could that mean a big gradient between Westchester and the South Shore/JFK?

Looking at models, I'm expecting to get out to a fast start here with below average temperatures to end November (Tues/Weds AM could be real cold) and then develop a large -NAO/Hudson Bay/Labrador block. When combined with an active PAC, which will limit arctic air in North America but bring storminess, we could see a very exciting December, a little bit like 2010 where the ATL block dominates.

Snowfall totals might depend on just how much we can pile up before a more typical La Nina/-AAM pattern takes hold and we lose the blocking caused by the rare October stratospheric vortex split. If the favorable pattern only lasts 3-4 weeks and then peters out, we might see the lower 20-25" totals you favor. If it, however, lasts 5-6 weeks and includes a major storm, we might get above average, similar to 10-11 where we piled up enough in Dec/Jan to have huge snowfall totals despite an unfavorable Feb/Mar pattern.

While I'm not sold on the pattern being as cold as Dec 2010 or having as many coastals as Jan 2011 when we benefited from a PNA spike as well, the fast start will be interesting.

Thoughts?

[Isotherm]

9 hours ago, nzucker said:

73-74 was a pretty average winter here with snowfall just exceeding 30"...there was a big ice storm in December as noted by quite a few posters. The winter had a prominent SE ridge that led to a lot of rain/mix/ice events. Are you anticipating a lot of mixed precipitation/changeover events this winter like that year? Could that mean a big gradient between Westchester and the South Shore/JFK?

Looking at models, I'm expecting to get out to a fast start here with below average temperatures to end November (Tues/Weds AM could be real cold) and then develop a large -NAO/Hudson Bay/Labrador block. When combined with an active PAC, which will limit arctic air in North America but bring storminess, we could see a very exciting December, a little bit like 2010 where the ATL block dominates.

Snowfall totals might depend on just how much we can pile up before a more typical La Nina/-AAM pattern takes hold and we lose the blocking caused by the rare October stratospheric vortex split. If the favorable pattern only lasts 3-4 weeks and then peters out, we might see the lower 20-25" totals you favor. If it, however, lasts 5-6 weeks and includes a major storm, we might get above average, similar to 10-11 where we piled up enough in Dec/Jan to have huge snowfall totals despite an unfavorable Feb/Mar pattern.

While I'm not sold on the pattern being as cold as Dec 2010 or having as many coastals as Jan 2011 when we benefited from a PNA spike as well, the fast start will be interesting.

Thoughts?

 

It will be interesting to see the extent to which early winter produces -- see my latest post in the La Nina thread. If some of the latest modelling verifies re the stratospheric vortex progression, we'll be rapidly intensifying following this weak period, which may mean a shorter duration tropospheric block. I don't see the background conditions being nearly as conducive as 10-11 for a protracted block persisting through January. Some of the latest runs which quickly strengthen 10hpa 60N zonal winds are more congruent with what I expected, but I would leave the door open for anything from a mediocre Dec-early Jan to potentially very good, contingent upon blocking. 

[Isotherm]

VERIFICATION:

 

FORECASTED:

 

 

 

 

 

 

ACTUAL:

 

DJF 500mb pattern:

DJF Temperature anomalies:

DJF Precipitation departures:

Central Park DJF temperature departure: +4.1

Most of the tri-state area finished between +3.5 and +4.2 for temperature departures.

Snowfall: 30.2″

Snowfall Forecast versus actual totals:

Burlington, VT: 90-100” 91”

Boston: 40-45” 45.8”

New York City: 21-26” 30.2”

Philadelphia: 13-18” 15”

Baltimore: 10-15” 2.9”

Washington DC: 9-14” 3.4”

Richmond, VA: 5-10” 7.1”

Raleigh, NC: 0-5” 0.8”

Atlanta, GA: <2” T Houston, TX: <1” 0 Chicago, IL: 45-50” 26.1” Denver, CO: 60-65” 19.3” Seattle, WA: 5-10” 11.2”
VERIFICATION DISCUSSION:

Based upon the forecast maps from late November, the z500 pattern quite closely paralleled the outlook expectations. Troughiness preferentially favored the NW United States while concurrently, ridging predominated the Eastern US. Occasional poleward ridging near Alaska/Dateline permitted periodic cold blasts into the United States, but for the most part, the Pacific remained unfavorable. Additionally, the NAO was strongly positive as anticipated, with a largely inauspicious AO regime as well (both were positive).

In terms of the sensible weather, December verified as the coldest month of the winter with slightly warmer than normal temperatures in the East as forecasted, with January and February featuring well above normal temperatures.

Dryness dominated the South and East while a wetter than normal preferentially favored the West and northern tier.

Snowfall was very close to reality, with below to well below normal snowfall from 40N southward, and near or above normal snowfall from NYC northward. The slight flaw here was that the above normal snowfall extended a bit further south than expected into portions of the NYC area/Long Island. Furthermore, DCA/BWI area featured even less snowfall than forecast, and Denver into portions of the Mid-west (Chicago) received very little snow relative to normal. Seattle’s totals were close to forecasted, as were totals in the Southeast US and New England.

Overall, considering the lead time of the long range forecast and the nature of the record warmth in January and February, the outlook for solidly warmer than normal temperature departures across the vast majority of the United States worked very well in my opinion. Hindsight is 20/20, and certainly I would have gone even warmer, but given some conflicting signals (a few suggestive of cold) last autumn, the magnitude of the forecasted warmth was slightly tempered. Even still, the general ideas and progression verified, and this winter forecast will be considered a success. This will bring the long range success rate up to 80% since initiation of long range summer/winter outlooks in 2006.

Overall Winter 2016-17 Grade: A-

[Morris]

1 hour ago, Isotherm said:

VERIFICATION:

 

FORECASTED:

 

 

 

 

 

 

ACTUAL:

 

DJF 500mb pattern:

DJF Temperature anomalies:

DJF Precipitation departures:

Central Park DJF temperature departure: +4.1

Most of the tri-state area finished between +3.5 and +4.2 for temperature departures.

Snowfall: 30.2″

Snowfall Forecast versus actual totals:

Burlington, VT: 90-100” 91”

Boston: 40-45” 45.8”

New York City: 21-26” 30.2”

Philadelphia: 13-18” 15”

Baltimore: 10-15” 2.9”

Washington DC: 9-14” 3.4”

Richmond, VA: 5-10” 7.1”

Raleigh, NC: 0-5” 0.8”

Atlanta, GA: <2” T Houston, TX: <1” 0 Chicago, IL: 45-50” 26.1” Denver, CO: 60-65” 19.3” Seattle, WA: 5-10” 11.2”
VERIFICATION DISCUSSION:

Based upon the forecast maps from late November, the z500 pattern quite closely paralleled the outlook expectations. Troughiness preferentially favored the NW United States while concurrently, ridging predominated the Eastern US. Occasional poleward ridging near Alaska/Dateline permitted periodic cold blasts into the United States, but for the most part, the Pacific remained unfavorable. Additionally, the NAO was strongly positive as anticipated, with a largely inauspicious AO regime as well (both were positive).

In terms of the sensible weather, December verified as the coldest month of the winter with slightly warmer than normal temperatures in the East as forecasted, with January and February featuring well above normal temperatures.

Dryness dominated the South and East while a wetter than normal preferentially favored the West and northern tier.

Snowfall was very close to reality, with below to well below normal snowfall from 40N southward, and near or above normal snowfall from NYC northward. The slight flaw here was that the above normal snowfall extended a bit further south than expected into portions of the NYC area/Long Island. Furthermore, DCA/BWI area featured even less snowfall than forecast, and Denver into portions of the Mid-west (Chicago) received very little snow relative to normal. Seattle’s totals were close to forecasted, as were totals in the Southeast US and New England.

Overall, considering the lead time of the long range forecast and the nature of the record warmth in January and February, the outlook for solidly warmer than normal temperature departures across the vast majority of the United States worked very well in my opinion. Hindsight is 20/20, and certainly I would have gone even warmer, but given some conflicting signals (a few suggestive of cold) last autumn, the magnitude of the forecasted warmth was slightly tempered. Even still, the general ideas and progression verified, and this winter forecast will be considered a success. This will bring the long range success rate up to 80% since initiation of long range summer/winter outlooks in 2006.

Overall Winter 2016-17 Grade: A-

Just amazing job!

[nzucker]

On 11/17/2016 at 2:39 PM, nzucker said:

 

A lot of people are talking about a cold active March like 1967, 1996, 2015. what do you think?

 

 

Kudos to me for pointing out the potential for a major pattern change towards cold and snowy in March. 

Seriously, great job, Tom. Beautiful forecast, almost perfect.

What about next winter?

[uncle W]

great job..

[Isotherm]

Thank you - much appreciated guys. Looking forward to the next outlook season already.

[nzucker]

11 hours ago, Isotherm said:

Thank you - much appreciated guys. Looking forward to the next outlook season already.

You thinking cold and snowy with a weak El Nino?