Rjay Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 On 1/5/2017 at 2:49 AM, WeatherFeen2000 said: Call me crazy, call me a feen but I think we are going to trend big starting tonight! Expand Nope Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doncat Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 With a mean temp of 55.5 degrees, 2016 was the 4th warmest here since 1977... 2006,1998 and 2012 were warmer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coastalplainsnowman Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 On 1/5/2017 at 9:17 AM, doncat said: With a mean temp of 55.5 degrees, 2016 was the 4th warmest here since 1977... 2006,1998 and 2012 were warmer. Expand Just curious - your starting point was 1977 - was that because you are looking back an even 40 years, or was 1976 also warmer than 2016? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doncat Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 On 1/5/2017 at 9:34 AM, coastalplainsnowman said: Just curious - your starting point was 1977 - was that because you are looking back an even 40 years, or was 1976 also warmer than 2016? Expand That's just when I started keeping records...I actually have written records going back even farther but consider 1977 as my official starting point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 Top 5 warmest year across the region. LGA...58.7...#1 JFK....56.7...#3 EWR..57.2...#4 NYC...57.2...#2 BDR...55.3...#3 PHL...58.4....#2 POU...53.4...#2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uncle W Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 Don that's a great thing you have going...40 yrs of record is exceptional...2016 and 1998 were similar except on January 23rd, 1998 NYC picked up 2.5" of rain...2016 had almost as much precipitation but it was snow... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmillz25 Posted January 5, 2017 Author Share Posted January 5, 2017 Rain drop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NortheastPAWx Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 @Rjay See, I told you one of those NAMs would come through for us! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJwx85 Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 Where is UlsterCountySnowz? Figured he'd be all over this potential for 2-3 flakes in his backyard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmillz25 Posted January 5, 2017 Author Share Posted January 5, 2017 On 1/5/2017 at 3:04 PM, NJwx85 said: Where is UlsterCountySnowz? Figured he'd be all over this potential for 2-3 flakes in his backyard? Expand He has ptsd from the last few winters so he backed away for a few lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doncat Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 On 1/5/2017 at 2:02 PM, uncle W said: Don that's a great thing you have going...40 yrs of record is exceptional...2016 and 1998 were similar except on January 23rd, 1998 NYC picked up 2.5" of rain...2016 had almost as much precipitation but it was snow... Expand Yeah thanks Joe...can't believe so much time has passed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tdp146 Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 This new NAM seems like a lot of fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NycStormChaser Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 But people insisted wave two was a goner? Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forkyfork Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 that model is worthless Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IrishRob17 Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 On 1/5/2017 at 3:04 PM, NJwx85 said: Where is UlsterCountySnowz? Figured he'd be all over this potential for 2-3 flakes in his backyard? Expand He's pretty banged up so I'm guessing other priorities but he's around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rjay Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 On 1/5/2017 at 5:39 PM, forkyfork said: that model is worthless Expand Preach brother Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BxEngine Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 On 1/5/2017 at 5:39 PM, forkyfork said: that model is worthless Expand Just wait for the one time it gets something right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rjay Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 On 1/5/2017 at 6:21 PM, BxEngine said: Just wait for the one time it gets something right. Expand Last January. And Forky said it was onto something from the very beginning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BxEngine Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 On 1/5/2017 at 6:22 PM, Rjay said: Last January. And Forky said it was onto something from the very beginning. Expand Eff last january. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IrishRob17 Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 On 1/5/2017 at 6:28 PM, BxEngine said: Eff last january. Expand This Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tdp146 Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 now when we get Nam'd it will be with triple the amplification and quadruple the precip. Sounds like the epitome of a "NAM upgrade" to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongBeachSurfFreak Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 On 1/5/2017 at 5:35 PM, seanick said: But people insisted wave two was a goner? Lol Expand Not gonna lie, yesterday I thought it was DOA. Shows why you can practice modelology. That's my own damn rule and I fell for it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pazzo83 Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 I think the real question we all have is: What does the JMA say? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IrishRob17 Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 On 1/5/2017 at 6:58 PM, pazzo83 said: I think the real question we all have is: What does the JMA say? Expand Check out the JMA-Para Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snywx Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 On 1/5/2017 at 6:59 PM, IrishRob17 said: Check out the JMA-Para Expand Heard it runs 8 times a day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
friedmators Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psv88 Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 Gotta love weenie logic. Euro bias, holds back energy in the SW, we toss, follow GFS here. GFS is lost as usual, follow Euro, UKie, etc. NAM is a joke, not a good model. I would follow the NAM for this one, and only the NAM. SREFS! SREFS are usually lost in these scenarios. Follow H5, dont look at the surface. H5 makes no sense here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danstorm Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 The word is "than"... as in, "the RGEM shows more than the GFS". Using the term "then" in the above construct essentially invalidates the content of one's post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IrishRob17 Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 On 1/5/2017 at 11:12 PM, danstorm said: The word is "than"... as in, "the RGEM shows more than the GFS". Using the term "then" in the above construct essentially invalidates the content of one's post. Expand Violently agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BxEngine Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 On 1/5/2017 at 11:31 PM, IrishRob17 said: Violently agree Expand Me two Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.