Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,909
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    WichitaChiefSam
    Newest Member
    WichitaChiefSam
    Joined

PTC Matthew


PaEasternWX

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 10/5/2016 at 5:24 PM, Bacon Strips said:

with Matt moving slightly faster than expected, that's enough evidence for me.  

those charts vary significantly. even hour to hour.

 

Expand  

Please educate us as I am trying to learn tropics.....so a system moving faster than expected is due in part to shear that it is encountering?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 10/5/2016 at 5:24 PM, Bacon Strips said:

with Matt moving slightly faster than expected, that's enough evidence for me.  

those charts vary significantly. even hour to hour.

 

Expand  

It's outflow. The worst part is, is that despite everyone respectfully correcting you, you still fail to admit that you are wrong. Being wrong doesn't bother me, I'm wrong all the time, but it's when you're wrong and refuse to admit it, that bothers me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 10/5/2016 at 5:26 PM, Ralph Wiggum said:

Please educate us as I am trying to learn tropics.....so a system moving faster than expected is due in part to shear that it is encountering?

Expand  

 

Optimal movement would be what NHC currently has it at.  10 to 15 MPH.  (they say it's currently 12mph)  But it appears to be moving faster than that.   They'll probably update at 2 or 5pm.

And what is occurring now is not what you call optimal outflow. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 10/5/2016 at 5:31 PM, Bacon Strips said:

 

Optimal movement would be what NHC currently has it at.  10 to 15 MPH.  (they say it's currently 12mph)  But it appears to be moving faster than that.   They'll probably update at 2 or 5pm.

And what is occurring now is not what you call optimal outflow. 

 

Expand  

But how would what you call 'shear' affect the forward speed of the system? Arent shear and steering currents 2 completely different atmospheric levels?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 10/5/2016 at 5:31 PM, Bacon Strips said:

 

Optimal movement would be what NHC currently has it at.  10 to 15 MPH.  (they say it's currently 12mph)  But it appears to be moving faster than that.   They'll probably update at 2 or 5pm.

And what is occurring now is not what you call optimal outflow. 

 

Expand  

What's occurring now is that you're becoming dangerously close to riding out the storm offline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 10/5/2016 at 5:31 PM, Bacon Strips said:

 

Optimal movement would be what NHC currently has it at.  10 to 15 MPH.  (they say it's currently 12mph)  But it appears to be moving faster than that.   They'll probably update at 2 or 5pm.

And what is occurring now is not what you call optimal outflow. 

 

Expand  

You called it shear so how would you know it's not optimal outflow.  Frankly you don't know what you are talking about.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 10/5/2016 at 5:33 PM, Ralph Wiggum said:

But how would what you call 'shear' affect the forward speed of the system? Arent shear and steering currents 2 completely different atmospheric levels?

Expand  

It's clear he's just using tropical word salad. "The forecasted amplification of the shear is in excess of the forward motion of the anticyclonic flow during low tide..."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 10/5/2016 at 5:31 PM, Bacon Strips said:

 

Optimal movement would be what NHC currently has it at.  10 to 15 MPH.  (they say it's currently 12mph)  But it appears to be moving faster than that.   They'll probably update at 2 or 5pm.

And what is occurring now is not what you call optimal outflow. 

 

Expand  

It is in low shear environment...as the COC's realign themselves, and the deep thunderstorms wrap completely...and this will take on the classic intense hurricane "look" again....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 10/5/2016 at 5:21 PM, PackGrad05 said:

What would need to happen for it to continue north toward NC again?

Expand  

Least amount of interaction with FL coast combined with increased forward speed allowing Matthew to stay ahead of the trough and begin to phase with it near eastern NC, this risk appears to have dropped to about one in ten now, only the CMC (GEM) has any hint of the storm failing to loop or meander and even its depiction is not all that robust beyond SC, very last minute pick-up of a rapidly weakening Matthew on that model. 

This is really about as nowcasting a tropical cyclone situation as we've seen in recent years, a lot depends on what happens in the next 12-24 hours, if it gets back to cat-4 then I think it has more chance of picking up forward speed but at the same time that probably increases the risk to central FL too, if the storm underperforms it is more likely to get trapped in the loop out to sea and would likely stay well off the FL coast. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 10/5/2016 at 5:52 PM, JasonOH said:

I don't think you can only compliment the EURO.  GFS jumped away at the same time. NCEP is not going to be happy.

Expand  

I also dont think anyone should write off anything for NC at this time. There are still indications Matthew could be a player in E NC before shooting East.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...