WaPo Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 If you have a question, please look around the forum first; particularly around the stickied posts, before posting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mimillman Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 7 minutes ago, Franklin0529 said: Weather channel is starting to talk about this being as bad flooding wise like sandy.. I sure hope not.. I hope everyone in here stays safe.. i look forward to hearing everyone thoughts everyday. You guys are pretty damn good I think the flooding will get bad in southern New Jersey and along the Delmarva peninsula, but not so terrible up by New York. The size and strength of this system is not as bad as Sandy, but the south Jersey shore and Delmarva will be battered by upwards of 36 hours of sustained west north westerly tropical storm force winds with some hurricane force gusts mixing down to the surface. Rainfall amounts should be close to 5" from Atlantic City south, and my guess is areas on the immediate shore in Delaware could see up to 10" locally. Beach erosion should be the biggest story by far with sustained tropical storm conditions over such a long period. Although surface sustained winds at JFK hover around 30kt on the 12zGFS txt soundings, stronger winds are not far above..975mb winds sustained around 48kt over a 12 hour period. Gusts will be strong, and I suspect airports will be shut or running on very limited schedules. Even if a plane can take off in 30kt winds, it can't fly directly into 50kt winds just above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RU4Real Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 1 minute ago, mimillman said: Even if a plane can take off in 30kt winds, it can't fly directly into 50kt winds just above. wait wut Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
e46and2 Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 1 minute ago, mimillman said: I think the flooding will get bad in southern New Jersey and along the Delmarva peninsula, but not so terrible up by New York. The size and strength of this system is not as bad as Sandy, but the south Jersey shore and Delmarva will be battered by upwards of 36 hours of sustained west north westerly tropical storm force winds with some hurricane force gusts mixing down to the surface. Rainfall amounts should be close to 5" from Atlantic City south, and my guess is areas on the immediate shore in Delaware could see up to 10" locally. Beach erosion should be the biggest story by far with sustained tropical storm conditions over such a long period. Although surface sustained winds at JFK hover around 30kt on the 12zGFS txt soundings, stronger winds are not far above..975mb winds sustained around 48kt over a 12 hour period. Gusts will be strong, and I suspect airports will be shut or running on very limited schedules. Even if a plane can take off in 30kt winds, it can't fly directly into 50kt winds just above. westerly winds? thank god the beaches are saved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 12 minutes ago, mimillman said: I think the flooding will get bad in southern New Jersey and along the Delmarva peninsula, but not so terrible up by New York. The size and strength of this system is not as bad as Sandy, but the south Jersey shore and Delmarva will be battered by upwards of 36 hours of sustained west north westerly tropical storm force winds with some hurricane force gusts mixing down to the surface. Rainfall amounts should be close to 5" from Atlantic City south, and my guess is areas on the immediate shore in Delaware could see up to 10" locally. Beach erosion should be the biggest story by far with sustained tropical storm conditions over such a long period. Although surface sustained winds at JFK hover around 30kt on the 12zGFS txt soundings, stronger winds are not far above..975mb winds sustained around 48kt over a 12 hour period. Gusts will be strong, and I suspect airports will be shut or running on very limited schedules. Even if a plane can take off in 30kt winds, it can't fly directly into 50kt winds just above. JFK can operate okay on strong NE winds, LGA generally cannot as much. Its mostly due to runway configuration. And if winds go E or ESE JFK and LGA both have trouble. I don't see it being a mass cancel situation as of now though. International flights will probably be okay with some domestic cancels. They luck out a bit with the holiday falling Monday so there is likely a lighter flying schedule Sunday than usual and even Monday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mimillman Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 12 minutes ago, e46and2 said: westerly winds? thank god the beaches are saved. Funny, you know what I meant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mimillman Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 13 minutes ago, RU4Real said: wait wut Yes, I believe winds two to three times their normal level in the shallower part of the column will have an effect on air safety. You don't think so? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 2 minutes ago, mimillman said: Yes, I believe winds two to three times their normal level in the shallower part of the column will have an effect on air safety. You don't think so? On takeoff not so much, on landing it can be really rough, especially if there is directional shear. I did not look at soundings, but a storm like this would most likely have mainly speed shear in the bottom 5,000 feet and not much directional. JFK and LGA's worst setups occur in winter or fall when warm fronts stall over CNJ or SNJ ahead of cutting lows. NE winds often hang on in the low levels while the wind at 5,000 feet is screaming out of the S or SSE. There tend to be numerous severe turbulence encounters and sometimes missed approaches during these events. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mimillman Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 8 minutes ago, SnowGoose69 said: On takeoff not so much, on landing it can be really rough, especially if there is directional shear. I did not look at soundings, but a storm like this would most likely have mainly speed shear in the bottom 5,000 feet and not much directional. JFK and LGA's worst setups occur in winter or fall when warm fronts stall over CNJ or SNJ ahead of cutting lows. NE winds often hang on in the low levels while the wind at 5,000 feet is screaming out of the S or SSE. There tend to be numerous severe turbulence encounters and sometimes missed approaches during these events. Thanks for the input! I wonder how any possible delayed landings will affect take off times. I just took a look at the column and it appears winds stay ENE all the way up to 400mb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RU4Real Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 6 minutes ago, mimillman said: Yes, I believe winds two to three times their normal level in the shallower part of the column will have an effect on air safety. You don't think so? The only thing that matters are the absolute numbers with respect to IAS (Indicated Airspeed). Most commercial jets takeoff at about 150 - 180 mph. They will accelerate very quickly to the 250 mph limit for operations below 10,000'. Flying into a 50 mph headwind will lower their ground speed, but does not affect the ability of the aircraft to operate at all. Weather affects aircraft departure in 3 ways - the ability of the aircraft to actually takeoff and climb, within its safe operating parameters; the ability of the aircraft to return and land at the same airport in the event of a departure emergency; the ability for emergency services to safely operate in the event of a serious event (this last is the reason why commercial aircraft don't operate in near- or zero visibility in spite of the theoretical ability to do so given precision navaids and automation). Regional turboprop aircraft will cease operations well before conditions meet those you describe, because they operate at much lower speeds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nesussxwx Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 NJ Met Jonathan Carr's reason on why he thinks this is coming west once off OBX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 Should be a blast working during it this weekend and especially monday when I have to work the carribean parade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NortheastPAWx Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 Just now, Snow88 said: Should be a blast working during it this weekend and especially monday when I have to work the carribean parade. Good luck having that parade if the west trends continue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blizzard-on-GFS Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 GFDL says swoooosh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franklin0529 Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 What do you mean by swoosh? Is that more crippling for Jersey shore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 10 minutes ago, Franklin0529 said: What do you mean by swoosh? Is that more crippling for Jersey shore Yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BombsAway1288 Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 12 minutes ago, Franklin0529 said: What do you mean by swoosh? Is that more crippling for Jersey shore Lol. You can't tell by just looking at it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blizzard-on-GFS Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 2 minutes ago, Snow88 said: Yes 16 minutes ago, Franklin0529 said: What do you mean by swoosh? Is that more crippling for Jersey shore GFDL says swoooosh! I meant to say sploosh lol. And yes. I have a house down LBI and I think it's going to be pretty epic down here. I was away for Sandy. I would like to stay to witness this. If it gets to hairy though I'm gonna have to evacuate though. It's scary how little people are talking about this; especially considering its LDW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian5671 Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 10 minutes ago, Bacon Strips said: nam looks like it's gonna be another big hit. looks flatter on the northern side-maybe a stronger high to the north??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rogue Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 2 minutes ago, Blizzard-on-GFS said: GFDL says swoooosh! I meant to say sploosh lol. And yes. I have a house down LBI and I think it's going to be pretty epic down here. I was away for Sandy. I would like to stay to witness this. If it gets to hairy though I'm gonna have to evacuate though. It's scary how little people are talking about this; especially considering its LDW. Was talking to a neighbor of mine this afternoon here in northern NJ who also has a house and boat on LBI. When I asked him if he was making plans to protect his property he had absolutely no clue. "What storm?" is what he said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RU848789 Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 1 hour ago, mimillman said: I think the flooding will get bad in southern New Jersey and along the Delmarva peninsula, but not so terrible up by New York. The size and strength of this system is not as bad as Sandy, but the south Jersey shore and Delmarva will be battered by upwards of 36 hours of sustained west north westerly tropical storm force winds with some hurricane force gusts mixing down to the surface. Rainfall amounts should be close to 5" from Atlantic City south, and my guess is areas on the immediate shore in Delaware could see up to 10" locally. Beach erosion should be the biggest story by far with sustained tropical storm conditions over such a long period. Agreed. Sandy came ashore north of AC and was much larger and more powerful than Hermine is expected to be, even after strengthening some and its NW path was such that areas to its north were on the receiving end of powerful easterly winds as it approached and made landfall and continued inland. That's why areas from LBI to NYC/LI saw storm surges 4-5 feet greater than seen for Irene or any other storm in history, which is why the flooding was catastrophic. I haven't seen any forecasts of surges north of LBI that are like Sandy: have only seen surges to about 9' above the MLLW (mean lower low water level), not the 13.5' above the MLLW seen with Sandy. That's major flooding, similar to what was seen for Irene, (being 3-4' above the mean high water level) to be sure, but not catastrophic. http://www.nws.noaa.gov/mdl/etsurge/index.php?page=stn®ion=ne&datum=msl&list=&map=0-48&type=both&stn=njsand For Sandy the winds were not onshore preceding landfall from AC on southward, greatly reducing flooding there, although the flooding was still close to the old records (but way less than what was observed for Sandy to the north). However Hermine will be SSE of AC and Cape May and most of the time during/after the retrograde, should that occur, so they'll get the worst conditions, but nowhere near the conditions areas LBI on north saw for Sandy. Current projected surge in AC brings the water to about 9' above the MLLW, which is similar to what was seen for Sandy and other storms in history. So yes, Hermine will likely be similar to Sandy for areas south of LBI, but that means major flooding, not catastrophic, which is what the NWS in Mt. Holly is predicting for AC/Cape May (major, not catastrophic). http://www.weather.gov/media/phi/current_briefing.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allgame830 Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 It really is amazing how well the structure of Hermine has held together since its been over land for almost 24 hours so far. What looks to be the estimated time Hermine will re enter the Atlantic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Animal Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 7 minutes ago, RU848789 said: Agreed. Sandy came ashore north of AC and was much larger and more powerful than Hermine is expected to be, even after strengthening some and its NW path was such that areas to its north were on the receiving end of powerful easterly winds as it approached and made landfall and continued inland. That's why areas from LBI to NYC/LI saw storm surges 4-5 feet greater than seen for Irene or any other storm in history, which is why the flooding was catastrophic. I haven't seen any forecasts of surges north of LBI that are like Sandy: have only seen surges to about 9' above the MLLW (mean lower low water level), not the 13.5' above the MLLW seen with Sandy. That's major flooding, similar to what was seen for Irene, (being 3-4' above the mean high water level) to be sure, but not catastrophic. http://www.nws.noaa.gov/mdl/etsurge/index.php?page=stn®ion=ne&datum=msl&list=&map=0-48&type=both&stn=njsand For Sandy the winds were not onshore preceding landfall from AC on southward, greatly reducing flooding there, although the flooding was still close to the old records (but way less than what was observed for Sandy to the north). However Hermine will be SSE of AC and Cape May and most of the time during/after the retrograde, should that occur, so they'll get the worst conditions, but nowhere near the conditions areas LBI on north saw for Sandy. Current projected surge in AC brings the water to about 9' above the MLLW, which is similar to what was seen for Sandy and other storms in history. So yes, Hermine will likely be similar to Sandy for areas south of LBI, but that means major flooding, not catastrophic, which is what the NWS in Mt. Holly is predicting for AC/Cape May (major, not catastrophic). http://www.weather.gov/media/phi/current_briefing.pdf Lot's of noise. You get storms on the coast with flooding and wind every other year. Some people are hyping this storm a little too much. Get sand bags if you live in an area that floods, move your car inland, check on the elderly, have batteries in flashlights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sophisticated Skeptic Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 12 minutes ago, Brian5671 said: looks flatter on the northern side-maybe a stronger high to the north??? the 500 vort max is much further offshore. (at 36 hour) could just be bad run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mimillman Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 Good shift to the east on the 00z NAM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith O Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 4 minutes ago, mimillman said: Good shift to the east on the 00z NAM Not that I believe the NAM but if true would spare NJ any significant issues. Let's see if other 0Z guidance follows suit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian5671 Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 1 minute ago, Keith O said: Not that I believe the NAM but if true would spare NJ any significant issues. Let's see if other 0Z guidance follows suit. hard to imagine the GFS Euro and their ensembles being that wrong 2 days out. NAM is not a global model. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJwx85 Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 First of all it's the NAM NAM = Complete Garbage Secondly, it starts moving NW towards the coast on Sunday night. Lastly it still shows 50-60MPH winds at the NJ coast, so no, they don't avoid significant damage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sophisticated Skeptic Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 yea, but NAM is generally decent within 48. It has been screwy this year , maybe they've been toying around with it too much. GFS is now significantly more west than NAM. Which is rare for a coastal forecast up in this area. really tempted for 0z GFS now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason WX Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 4K nam is WAY west. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.