Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

I'll see you in September


J Paul Gordon

Recommended Posts

 

Despite the low high of ORH, the low was high, so it was really a -3 day

Would 83 be a "scorcher"?  I guess... it would be a +10 for the high, so I would call it a torchy day.  Nothing really unusual for September for sure

 

But it certainly isn't the 90F that some posters were touting for my location

You'll have ~20C 850s over your head mid morning Friday. Let's let it play out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 771
  • Created
  • Last Reply
 

Using ORH as the closest climate station to your location.  When it comes to measuring whether or not a day is hot or cold it all comes down to the "normal" values for that day.  Take yesterday for instance.  ORH had a high of 67, normal is 73. A -6F of the day.  That's well below the "normal" value.  If you take the converse and were to add 6F and the day was 80F, that's well above normal.  If you were to get a day in the mid 80s, that would be a scorcher, relative to your locations normal temp.  Does that help?

http://w2.weather.gov/climate/getclimate.php?wfo

ORH is only 50 miles away.  :)

 

Again, "average" and "normal" are not synonymous.  All average temps will be within the realm of 'normal', but normal temps do not need to be average.  As PF said, let's look at standard deviations.  We can argue is it 1 or 2 SD that make for a torch/freezer, e.g.  While I don't have the numbers, my instinct would way that the SD of the transitional months is significantly larger than the doldrums of summer/depths of winter.

 

It's been a while since I've taken a stats class, but less than 1SD is generally noise, 3 is quite dramatic.  Between 1-3 we can discuss magnitude.

Meanwhile, a really manky day, cloudy and 67*.  Below average, but still very much "normal".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

You'll have ~20C 850s over your head mid morning Friday. Let's let it play out.

We will see what that translates to on the surface.  I will go with 85F at ORH (torch), 84F at my house . I was expecting BOX to start ratcheting up the p n c to match up with those numbers that you quoted, but so far they are staying put.

My classroom will be a sauna nonetheless.  KFIT should be good for an 88F-90F if it clears out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

ORH is only 50 miles away.  :)

 

Again, "average" and "normal" are not synonymous.  All average temps will be within the realm of 'normal', but normal temps do not need to be average.  As PF said, let's look at standard deviations.  We can argue is it 1 or 2 SD that make for a torch/freezer, e.g.  While I don't have the numbers, my instinct would way that the SD of the transitional months is significantly larger than the doldrums of summer/depths of winter.

 

It's been a while since I've taken a stats class, but less than 1SD is generally noise, 3 is quite dramatic.  Between 1-3 we can discuss magnitude.

Meanwhile, a really manky day, cloudy and 67*.  Below average, but still very much "normal".

Meteorologically, "normal" is the running decadal 30-year average (with a little curve fitting). So when we refer to "normal" we mean the 30yr average. On a -5F day we don't say "5F below average"...we say "5F below normal". I think you know this so you may be arguing some other semantical argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, dendrite said:

There's hyperbole on both sides. 65F isn't hot, but it's a torch for MWN.

There's almost like two different discussions..."roasting" to me with days and days of AC needed is less of a departure thing and more a sensible weather thing.  

It's definitely a warm pattern.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, dendrite said:

There's hyperbole on both sides. 65F isn't hot, but it's a torch for MWN.

i'd replace 'hyperbole' with 'futility' ... if not 'moot-ness' in the latter sense, then i'd agree fully.  

not that anyone asked, but coming in here and down playing heat when you live on a mountain top is ...  incongruent; to the extent that it mystifies why people argue about someone else's apples while shouting about their own orangy examples..   

contrasting, anyone gullible enough to get sucked into a subjective debate/argument that then features smoldering if perhaps non-disclosed hostility in between every word, ...is just about evenly pointless, and they get the annoyance they deserve.  

but that just me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Damage In Tolland said:

His normal is about 72. 10 -12 degrees AN..if that's not furnaced I'm not sure what is

 

Darn right you’re not sure, nor is anybody else, that’s why these conversations continuously go round and round.  It’s good fodder for discussion though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dendrite said:

+10 is most impressive in summer and least impressive in winter. SDs are highest in winter.

 

I'm surprised that the SD's are not highest during the transitional seasons since they would seem to be the most volatile temp-wise.  I suspect it'll make some intuitive sense to me at some point.  I need to draw myself a curve to visualize the temp dispersion.  No time to do that now.  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, OceanStWx said:

Pretty similar to the post about today's info from earlier in the thread, 7.3 degrees.

Good to know...I love using the SDs, so +10 would be "well above" then as I like to use the SD to quantify the subjective terminology.  

Like with snowfall, anything inside of 1 SD is sort of "normal" in my mind...same with temps.  But you'd need a large period of record to get that correctly...if not a lot of data that 1 SD could be huge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, powderfreak said:

Good to know...I love using the SDs, so +10 would be "well above" then as I like to use the SD to quantify the subjective terminology.  

Like with snowfall, anything inside of 1 SD is sort of "normal" in my mind...same with temps. 

Yeah I mean +/- 1 could be termed above or below normal, but nearly 3 out of 4 times your data will fall within those goalposts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OceanStWx said:

Yeah I mean +/- 1 could be termed above or below normal, but nearly 3 out of 4 times your data will fall within those goalposts.

It's a good measure to see if something is worth hyping or even discussing as anything close to abnormal.

If +8 for a daily mean is above 1 SD, then yeah I can get on board with it being anomalous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, moneypitmike said:

 

I'm surprised that the SD's are not highest during the transitional seasons since they would seem to be the most volatile temp-wise.  I suspect it'll make some intuitive sense to me at some point.  I need to draw myself a curve to visualize the temp dispersion.  No time to do that now.  :)

Just think of the extremes for each point in the season. At CON, in the peak of summer the range of highs is about 60F to 100F...so a range of 40F. At the peak of winter the spread is about 0F to 65F or a range of 65F. At the autumnal climo midpoint (10/20ish) the spread is about 40F to 85F...so a range of only 45F.

You basically stretch the goalposts out a lot further in winter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, powderfreak said:

Good to know...I love using the SDs, so +10 would be "well above" then as I like to use the SD to quantify the subjective terminology.  

Like with snowfall, anything inside of 1 SD is sort of "normal" in my mind...same with temps.  But you'd need a large period of record to get that correctly...if not a lot of data that 1 SD could be huge.

Yeah...I like looking at it on a normal curve. Anything >2SD is a definite torch...i.e. top 2.5%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Jspin, what is 1 SD for your snowfall distribution?

With the addition of last season’s data to create a 10-year data set, it’s now 39.1” (26.4%).  Not surprisingly, that’s a substantial increase from what it was before the addition of the latest data (30.3”; 19.4%) due to last season’s anomalous -2.78 S.D. snow total.  For the sanity of those up in this neck of the woods, let’s hope that doesn’t happen again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...