Solak Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 http://www.noaa.gov/noaa-develop-new-global-weather-model Just came across Twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wow Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 This is encouraging. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avdave Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 Pretty interesting read. The weenies will love it showing possible extreme events 3-4 weeks in advance. But this is something needed and will be nice to have a comparable to perhaps the Euro though they are two different models. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
isohume Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 For once I agree with Cliff Mass. Too late, but NOAA should develop the MPAS not the FV3. http://cliffmass.blogspot.in/2016/03/the-national-weather-service-selects.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TullyHeel Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 On 7/27/2016 at 8:54 PM, Avdave said: Pretty interesting read. The weenies will love it showing possible extreme events 3-4 weeks in advance. Expand So now we can have our hopes and dreams crushed 3 to 4 weeks out instead of the usual 10 to 14 days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavarreDon Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 http://www.forbes.com/sites/marshallshepherd/2016/07/28/major-changes-for-3-u-s-weather-models-are-coming/#31c4524e5227 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TullyHeel Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 Can you imagine if they actually develop a model that can get extreme events right 3 to 4 weeks out? The anticipation would be maddening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
griteater Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 On 7/28/2016 at 12:29 PM, isohume said: For once I agree with Cliff Mass. Too late, but NOAA should develop the MPAS not the FV3. http://cliffmass.blogspot.in/2016/03/the-national-weather-service-selects.html Expand So Model A is better than Model B, but we choose Model B. Awesome! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TullyHeel Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 It's going to be awful when we see a model showing a massive snow storm here 4 weeks out only for it to go to poop 24 hours out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RubiksDestroyer Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 On 7/28/2016 at 12:29 PM, isohume said: For once I agree with Cliff Mass. Too late, but NOAA should develop the MPAS not the FV3. http://cliffmass.blogspot.in/2016/03/the-national-weather-service-selects.html Expand Yeah, I saw this blog post a couple of weeks ago (in fact, it was probably someone on this board who posted it), and I'm pretty disappointed with NOAA's choice. MPAS truly seems to be the superior, cutting-edge choice. Of course, FV3 will be an improvement, but... It could've been better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
isohume Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 On 7/28/2016 at 4:06 PM, griteater said: So Model A is better than Model B, but we choose Model B. Awesome! Expand Yeah, unfair "competition". The FV3 is an in-house contract. Probably cheaper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
isohume Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 On 7/28/2016 at 4:25 PM, RubiksDestroyer said: Yeah, I saw this blog post a couple of weeks ago (in fact, it was probably someone on this board who posted it), and I'm pretty disappointed with NOAA's choice. MPAS truly seems to be the superior, cutting-edge choice. Of course, FV3 will be an improvement, but... It could've been better. Expand Accuwx will probably develop the MPAS and we'll never hear the end of it. Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrdaddyman Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 ". . . a unified system to improve forecast accuracy beyond 8 to 10 days . . . " Really?! How about they focus on getting the 1-7 day forecasts accurate first. Most of the time the GFS can't even get a 2 day forecast correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NWNC2015 Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 can't figure out how to fix what they have right now doesn't give me much hope for this. probably just faster/tighter resolution/more colorful Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.