Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

June 21 and 23 severe weather risks


Ian

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 727
  • Created
  • Last Reply

damn, thank goodness the house wasn't damaged and all is well. sorry about the mess though. hope clean up goes smoothly. 

Thanks. :)

Reminds me to be careful of what I wish for sometimes concerning active weather.  Although, I'll probably still be pulling for some exciting storms tomorrow. ^_^

 

MDstorm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. :)

Reminds me to be careful of what I wish for sometimes concerning active weather.  Although, I'll probably still be pulling for some exciting storms tomorrow. ^_^

 

MDstorm

 

the only thing i will not actively root for is ice. ill deal with the cleanup from everything else. 

 

 

and i guess a tornado... don't really root for those to happen. just follow along when they do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Afternoon AFD from LWX:

 

Area Forecast Discussion
National Weather Service Baltimore MD/Washington DC
310 PM EDT Wed Jun 22 2016

.SYNOPSIS...
Low pressure will approach from the Ohio Valley tonight and then
move across the region Thursday. High pressure will build into the
area Thursday night and remain through the weekend. A cold front
will approach the mid-Atlantic early next week.

&&

.NEAR TERM /THROUGH THURSDAY/...
At present...slow-moving cold front has sunk south of most of the
CWA but remains draped across central Virginia. Much drier and
more stable air mass in place across most of the region at
present. Tonight, the front will try to back northward in advance
of low pressure moving eastward from the midwest. This low will
pass near the area during the day Thursday.

There is a lot of uncertainty regarding severe weather and
flooding...mainly due to the presence of the aforementioned
front. Some guidance (GFS in particular) shoves the front back
north late tonight and early Thursday...resulting in an extremely
unstable atmosphere on Thursday afternoon (4000+ j/kg cape) from
which strong to severe storms would be likely. However...this
would not seem particularly likely if the idea of an MCS moving
across the region is correct...in which case the rain cooled air
would likely be stuck in a wedge east of the mountains and the
front would be unable to push back north. The other question
revolves around said MCS...which may or may not bring a round of
severe weather later tonight. With the front sagging southward
still and a stable air mass in place...any MCS moving in from the
west could just ride right over the stable air mass and start
weakening...which would reduce the severe threat. However...should
the front manage to slide back northward late tonight ahead of the
MCS...it could tap the more unstable air to the south directly and
bring another round of severe thunderstorms and heavy rain.

Right now...it is all very uncertain and hinges as mentioned on
any MCS development and the movement of the front. We have banked
more on MCS potential with the front perhaps pushing back north
overnight...and then stabilizing behind it with the front going
back south again during the day Thursday. This would mean a
severe/flood threat later tonight/early Thursday across the
region. However...given high uncertainty...have not expanded flash
flood watch any further east despite large amount of guidance
suggesting we should. This will be reviewed again during the
evening.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

haven't been following the midwest stuff a whole lot, but the fact that the HRRR has discrete supercells popping up 9-10pm in IL, is kind of scary. hope folks are paying attention out there tonight. 

people are so full of ****. a year ago everyone ragged on accuweather for hugging updraft helicity.. now it's all people do. lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean like this?  https://twitter.com/tlyzawx/status/745703622860808192

 

ZOOMG...TEH PARAMETERZ!!1!

Well I said 5 min but we'll prob see supercells for a bit.. that's generally how these things go. There is quite strong bulk shear. It could be supercellular a while I suppose. But still people (not Tony) are so hypocritical in the biz.. especially once they figure out what things get shares.  See the response to him. Again, when Accu brought that up they were endlessly mocked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[drive by]

 

The maps are nice but all you gotta do is look at the setup and where the boundaries are to see how there could be a problem later, and potentially in some populated areas.  I'm not sure there's an overwhelming signal to go linear super quickly.

 

[/drive by]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[drive by]

 

The maps are nice but all you gotta do is look at the setup and where the boundaries are to see how there could be a problem later, and potentially in some populated areas.  I'm not sure there's an overwhelming signal to go linear super quickly.

 

[/drive by]

Some people -- in EVERY setup -- run to the worst case scenario. They get free passes left and right. People that don't are called nuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SPC.. but if you read only chasers and the usual drama queens you'd think the end of the world was nigh. I mostly am very fearful of the next time we get a high risk for tornadoes. going to be mayhem online.

 

ONCE THIS OCCURS THE ENVIRONMENT WILL BE VERY SUPPORTIVE  
FOR INITIAL SUPERCELLS CAPABLE OF ALL HAZARDS /INCLUDING A TORNADO  
OR TWO/. QUICK UPSCALE GROWTH INTO A LINEAR MCS IS STILL ANTICIPATED  
WITH A DAMAGING WIND THREAT EXTENDING ACROSS MUCH OF THE OH VALLEY.  
THIS SCENARIO MATCHES PREVIOUS OUTLOOK THINKING WELL AND NO CHANGES  
WERE MADE TO THE OUTLOOK ACROSS THIS REGION.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ian, this isn't just weenies saying this event has real potential to be bad (heck LOT is going pretty hard in the paint for it). When you consider the short range high res model agreement + SREF, observations and the degree of shear in place here, I don't think people talking it up are out of line (aside from the ones that obviously don't know much).

 

/soapbox

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ian, this isn't just weenies saying this event has real potential to be bad (heck LOT is going pretty hard in the paint for it). When you consider the short range high res model agreement + SREF, observations and the degree of shear in place here, I don't think people talking it up are out of line (aside from the ones that obviously don't know much).

 

/soapbox

Well... I'll just stop commenting. We're buds so I don't want to offend you lol. I think I generally know how to assess a situation though. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

true

New HRRR misses Chicago and doesn't have super bright updraft helicity. I doubt it will be widely shared...

 

NSSL WRF oft hugged.. shows rapid upscale. Crickets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New HRRR misses Chicago and doesn't have super bright updraft helicity. I doubt it will be widely shared...

 

NSSL WRF oft hugged.. shows rapid upscale. Crickets.

 

To be fair, that's after a monstrous supercell hammers part of north-central IL.

 

The HRRR might not crush Chicago this run, but it still shows mainly discrete/semi-discrete convection through north-central IL, perhaps affecting the PIA metro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair, that's after a monstrous supercell hammers part of north-central IL.

 

The HRRR might not crush Chicago this run, but it still shows mainly discrete/semi-discrete convection through north-central IL, perhaps affecting the PIA metro.

Well it has big UH but not sure a supercell is going to be 6-10 counties big. But eh. The fun thing is we probably aren't that far off in thoughts (SEE MY OPENING HERE LOL) I just don't get the messaging from some folks. Even a big day in population it's hard to destroy a town. Yet there's a constant run to top 5 area events that caused massive devastation and such. This is certainly not worth us fighting over.. unlike many of those who always run big I don't think people who dissent are idiots that need to be taught how to forecast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The silly soundings also show up at KIAD and KDCA too ;)

 

For 18z that is

 

ETA: And also at BWI (to a lil lesser extent) and at EZF

I still like my zone I outlined earlier. Too many muddy factors w/ the MCS progression tonight into tomorrow as well as exact track of the low and how far the front makes it north. You and VA folks will probably score on something. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no need to be sorry just an opening to say a lot of people are full of ****. :P

Saw quite a few on Twitter mentioning derecho when the squall hasn't even formed yet...so I get it.

But to be fair, models do look worrisome for later tonight.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...