Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

6/19-6/23 Severe Weather Risk


Jim Martin

Recommended Posts


PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT...CORRECTED  

NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE CHICAGO IL  

1208 PM CDT THU JUN 23 2016  

   

..NWS DAMAGE SURVEY FOR JUNE 22, 2016 TORNADO EVENT  

 

   

PONTIAC IL TORNADO  

 

RATING: EF-2  

ESTIMATED PEAK WIND: 115-125 MPH  

PATH LENGTH /STATUTE/: 11.1 MILES  

PATH WIDTH /MAXIMUM/: 440 YARDS  

FATALITIES: 0  

INJURIES: 4  

 

START DATE: JUNE 22, 2016  

START TIME: 1006 PM CDT  

START LOCATION: 8 MILES NORTHWEST OF PONTIAC  

START LAT/LON: 40.9183 / -88.7776  

 

END DATE: JUNE 22, 2016  

END TIME: 1024 PM CDT  

END LOCATION: 3 MILES SOUTHEAST OF PONTIAC  

END_LAT/LON: 40.8485 / -88.5857  

 

EF SCALE: THE ENHANCED FUJITA SCALE CLASSIFIES  

TORNADOES INTO THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES.  

 

EF0...WEAK......65 TO 85 MPH  

EF1...WEAK......86 TO 110 MPH  

EF2...STRONG....111 TO 135 MPH  

EF3...STRONG....136 TO 165 MPH  

EF4...VIOLENT...166 TO 200 MPH  

EF5...VIOLENT...>200 MPH  

 

NOTE:  

THE INFORMATION IN THIS STATEMENT IS PRELIMINARY AND SUBJECT TO  

CHANGE PENDING FINAL REVIEW OF THE EVENT AND PUBLICATION IN  

NWS STORM DATA.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

For a widespread moderate risk, it was a let down outside of a few areas.  Very little actual severe weather in either Indiana or Ohio.  I think heavy rain may have been the biggest news.

 

 

I've seen more lackluster than this in moderate risks

 

 

post-14-0-35130700-1466706177_thumb.png

 

 

I think part of it was that it was a struggle to get a large, well developed line.  Mostly had smaller scale lines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think part of it was that it was a struggle to get a large, well developed line. Mostly had smaller scale lines.

That's my thought too. It didn't become a large line as expected. At least it seems the models fared well in showing a few large supercells.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen more lackluster than this in moderate risks

 

 

attachicon.gifyesterday_filtered.gif.png

 

 

I think part of it was that it was a struggle to get a large, well developed line.  Mostly had smaller scale lines.

 

You can add another red dot to that map as we have a confirmed tornado in Huntington County. Details forthcoming after IWX issues their PNS, but I will say it appears to have been multi vortex in a least one location. Very impressive damage and no injuries. Spent four hours with NWS doing the survey. Pictures later after I have a shower, eat, and a nap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cissna Park tornado was officially rated an EF-1 with estimated winds of 110MPH, and a 3 mile long path.

When I was following that storm last night, I was thinking about my brothers co worker who lives there, who just rebuilt his home last year due to a fire, luckily no damage to his property last night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Other than very localized, the wind situation here wasn't bad at all.  It's noteworthy because that was the main headline leading up to this event.  The likelihood of widespread wind damage.   One forecaster here on the 6:00 news last evening had wind as the biggest threat and flooding as minimal.  It seemed to be the opposite as lots of places got 3-4" of rain and lots of significant street flooding.

 

On another note, a tornado was confirmed in Fayette county just to our south here in central OH, so that storm report map above is not quite up to date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can add another red dot to that map as we have a confirmed tornado in Huntington County. Details forthcoming after IWX issues their PNS, but I will say it appears to have been multi vortex in a least one location. Very impressive damage and no injuries. Spent four hours with NWS doing the survey. Pictures later after I have a shower, eat, and a nap.

Just saw that IWX confirmed an EF1 and EF2 southeast of Huntington.

I saw that they might be sending a team to the Brookston area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just saw that IWX confirmed an EF1 and EF2 southeast of Huntington.

I saw that they might be sending a team to the Brookston area.

 

Yeah, basically a multi vortex side-by-side.

 

000

NOUS43 KIWX 232302

PNSIWX

INZ003>009-012>018-020-022>027-032>034-MIZ077>081-OHZ001-002-004-

005-015-016-024-025-241115-

Public Information Statement

National Weather Service Northern Indiana

702 PM EDT THU JUN 23 2016 /602 PM CDT THU JUN 23 2016/

...NWS DAMAGE SURVEY FOR 06/22/2016 TORNADO EVENT...

.TORNADO #1 5 MILES SOUTH/SOUTHEAST OF HUNTINGTON...

Rating:                 EF-1

Estimated peak wind:    105 mph

Path length /Statute/:  2.5 miles

Path width /Maximum/:   200 yards

Fatalities:             0

Injuries:               0

Start date:             JUNE 22 2016

Start time:             12:51 AM EDT

Start location:         5.0 MILES SSE OF HUNTINGTON

Start Lat/Lon:          40.80298 / -85.46538

End date:               JUNE 22 2016

End time:               12:56 AM EDT

End location:           6.0 MILES SE OF HUNTINGTON

End_lat/lon:            40.80150 / -85.41959

 

.TORNADO #2 5.2 MILES SOUTHEAST OF HUNTINGTON...

Rating:                 EF-2

Estimated peak wind:    120 mph

Path length /Statute/:  2.4 miles

Path width /Maximum/:   300 yards

Fatalities:             0

Injuries:               0

Start date:             JUNE 22 2016

Start time:             12:57 AM EDT

Start location:         5.2 MILES SE OF HUNTINGTON

Start Lat/Lon:          40.81000 / -85.43548

End date:               JUNE 22 2016

End time:               01:02 AM EDT

End location:           7.5 MILES SE OF HUNTINGTON

End_lat/lon:            40.78232 / -85.40948

SURVEY_SUMMARY: MULTIPLE TORNADO TRACKS WERE UNCOVERED SOUTHEAST OF HUNTINGTON.

TORNADO #2 CROSSED TORNADO #1 PATH NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF CR 200 S AND CR 100 E.

NOTE:

The information in this statement is PRELIMINARY and subject to

change pending final review of the event and publication in

NWS Storm Data. Additional narrative data will be added Friday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a couple of the 88 pics I took of the Huntington tornadoes between last night and today (first one is of me in action lol):

 

attachicon.gifwilliams.jpg

That is really wild to see that doorway intact and basically the rest of the structure gone. I guess in this instance getting confused on earthquake and tornado responses would have been in someone's favor, this once.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Up to 9 tornadoes in LOT now but they mention that more may be added.

At least a few and possibly more than that will be added. I was on the survey from Lee County across northern LaSalle County (West Brooklyn to Sheridan area) and the Earlville area was insanely complex on the ground to decipher tornado damage vs RFD and if there was any overlap. We'll be confirming at least 1 tornado path and probably 2 there. We'll also be looking at aerial photos tomorrow, which will probably result in our preliminary findings being adjusted and potentially several more tornado paths that were not investigated by ground survey.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least a few and possibly more than that will be added. I was on the survey from Lee County across northern LaSalle County (West Brooklyn to Sheridan area) and the Earlville area was insanely complex on the ground to decipher tornado damage vs RFD and if there was any overlap. We'll be confirming at least 1 tornado path and probably 2 there. We'll also be looking at aerial photos tomorrow, which will probably result in our preliminary findings being adjusted and potentially several more tornado paths that were not investigated by ground survey.

Thanks for the info. In some ways (numbers, general zone of tornadoes, etc) last night was eerily reminiscent of June 22 of last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...