Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,612
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    RyRyB
    Newest Member
    RyRyB
    Joined

Active Severe Weather Pattern Beginning Next Week


Jim Martin

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE IN LUBBOCK HAS ISSUED A

* TORNADO WARNING FOR...
NORTHWESTERN CHILDRESS COUNTY IN THE PANHANDLE OF TEXAS...
NORTHEASTERN HALL COUNTY IN THE PANHANDLE OF TEXAS...

* UNTIL 730 PM CDT

* AT 658 PM CDT...A CONFIRMED LARGE AND EXTREMELY DANGEROUS TORNADO
WAS LOCATED 10 MILES SOUTHWEST OF MEMPHIS...MOVING NORTHEAST AT 15
MPH.

THIS IS A PARTICULARLY DANGEROUS SITUATION. TAKE COVER NOW!

HAZARD...DAMAGING TORNADO.

SOURCE...WEATHER SPOTTERS CONFIRMED TORNADO.

IMPACT...MOBILE HOMES WILL BE DAMAGED OR DESTROYED. DAMAGE TO
ROOFS...WINDOWS AND VEHICLES WILL OCCUR. FLYING DEBRIS
WILL BE DEADLY TO PEOPLE AND ANIMALS. TREE DAMAGE IS
LIKELY.

* THE TORNADO WILL BE NEAR...
MEMPHIS AROUND 730 PM CDT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MESOSCALE DISCUSSION 0682

NWS STORM PREDICTION CENTER NORMAN OK

0702 PM CDT SUN MAY 22 2016

AREAS AFFECTED...WRN TX...OK PANHANDLE AND SWRN KS

CONCERNING...TORNADO WATCH 190...

VALID 230002Z - 230200Z

THE SEVERE WEATHER THREAT FOR TORNADO WATCH 190 CONTINUES.

SUMMARY...THREAT FOR VERY LARGE HAIL...TORNADOES AND DAMAGING WIND

GUSTS WILL PERSIST THROUGH 03Z FROM PORTIONS OF WRN TX INTO THE TX

AND OK PANHANDLES AND SWRN KS.

DISCUSSION...NUMEROUS STORMS INCLUDING SUPERCELLS THAT INITIATED

ALONG AND JUST AHEAD OF DRYLINE PERSIST FROM NWRN TX NWD INTO SWRN

KS. VERY LARGE HAIL AND TORNADOES HAVE BEEN REPORTED WITH THESE

STORMS...AND THIS THREAT WILL LIKELY PERSIST DURING THE NEXT 2-3

HOURS BEFORE A GRADUAL WEAKENING TREND BEGINS. VWP DATA FROM

AMARILLO HAVE SHOWN A NOTABLE INCREASE IN BOTH 0-1 KM HODOGRAPHS

SIZE /200-250 0-1 KM STORM RELATIVE HELICITY/ AND MID-LEVEL WINDS.

THESE STORMS REMAIN IN A FAVORABLE LOCATION TO INGEST AIR FROM A

VERY MOIST AND UNSTABLE BOUNDARY LAYER WHERE WARM-SECTOR CAPE RANGES

FROM 2500-3500 J/KG. STORMS REMAIN RELATIVELY DISCRETE DESPITE

NUMEROUS STORM MERGERS...AND THE THREAT FOR VERY LARGE HAIL AND

TORNADOES WILL PERSIST NEXT 2-3 HOURS.

ONSET OF NOCTURNAL COOLING WILL RESULT IN A GRADUAL INCREASE IN

CONVECTIVE INHIBITION...AND STORMS SHOULD BEGIN A WEAKENING TREND BY

03Z. HOWEVER...THE STRENGTHENING LLJ MIGHT FOSTER THE MAINTENANCE OF

ONE OR MORE STORM CLUSTERS INTO THE LATE EVENING...BUT IF THIS

OCCURS PRIMARY THREAT WILL TRANSITION TO DAMAGING WIND.

..DIAL.. 05/23/2016

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Storm east of Spearman, TX has gone nuts too, chasers reporting 6 tornadoes throughout its life so far.

Yeah, that was the storm that Kelley Williamson had with the large wedge. Looks like rotation is beginning to pick up again on it, currently rain wrapped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TDS visible west of Forsan, TX.

I dont see anything on CC, but there is a tornado again... ...A TORNADO WARNING REMAINS IN EFFECT UNTIL 745 PM CDT FOR SOUTH

CENTRAL HOWARD AND NORTH CENTRAL GLASSCOCK COUNTIES...
    
AT 728 PM CDT...A CONFIRMED TORNADO WAS LOCATED OVER LEES...OR 10
MILES SOUTH OF BIG SPRING...AND IS NEARLY STATIONARY.
 
HAZARD...DAMAGING TORNADO AND BASEBALL SIZE HAIL. 
 
SOURCE...WEATHER SPOTTERS CONFIRMED TORNADO. 
 
IMPACT...FLYING DEBRIS WILL BE DANGEROUS TO THOSE CAUGHT WITHOUT 
         SHELTER. MOBILE HOMES WILL BE DAMAGED OR DESTROYED. DAMAGE 
         TO ROOFS...WINDOWS...AND VEHICLES WILL OCCUR.  TREE DAMAGE IS 
         LIKELY. 
 
THIS TORNADO WILL BE NEAR...
  LEES AROUND 745 PM CDT. 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Big Spring tornado is a bit of an oddity 23Z RAP indicates only 20-25kt at H85 in that part of TX with ~30kt at H5. LLVL winds however are very nicely backed. Appears to have interacted with a boundary that probably helped local enhance SRH and vorticity... The 4000+J/KG SBCAPE certainly helps too.

 

Appears to be another hook that developed behind what was the original one... Just acting like a typical supercell cluster, i.e, multiple hooks/tornadoes. 2nd hook has nice rotation attm, 1st hook not so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Big Spring tornado is a bit of an oddity 23Z RAP indicates only 20-25kt at H85 in that part of TX with ~30kt at H5. LLVL winds however are very nicely backed. Appears to have interacted with a boundary that probably helped local enhance SRH and vorticity... The 4000+J/KG SBCAPE certainly helps too.

 

Mesoanalysis has 300-400 J/Kg effective SRH in that area, and 15-20 kt 0-1 km shear.  Just goes to show that it's the shear that matters - not the actual wind magnitude at 850.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mesoanalysis has 300-400 J/Kg effective SRH in that area, and 15-20 kt 0-1 km shear. Just goes to show that it's the shear that matters - not the actual wind magnitude at 850.

bingo.

Speed shear, directional shear are a function of both direction and magnitude. Of course having 50 knots at 850 helps, but obviously therected are other ways to get it done. I don't think there was a boundary for augmentation anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what happened by Big Spring, there had to be an OFB or something similar involved. The 12z Midland sounding wasn't particularly impressive. 9b7ed4f8c3f9f22e60159a4dc553f63d.png

forecasting is about anticipating changes in the environment given observed and model data. WAA and sfc heating contributes to low level warming AND moistening, mid-level height falls cool the and erodes that cap, and you end up uncapped and highly unstable.

Winds change as sfc cyclogenesis occurs and back, and/or increase causing hodograph enlargement. These are changes you need to anticipate, as models aren't always spot on. NAM iirc was not forecasting such imoressive low level wind profiles - we're likely dealing with features not well sampled/resolved with this system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

forecasting is about anticipating changes in the environment given observed and model data. WAA and sfc heating contributes to low level warming AND moistening, mid-level height falls cool the and erodes that cap, and you end up uncapped and highly unstable.

Winds change as sfc cyclogenesis occurs and back, and/or increase causing hodograph enlargement. These are changes you need to anticipate, as models aren't always spot on. NAM iirc was not forecasting such imoressive low level wind profiles - we're likely dealing with features not well sampled/resolved with this system.

 

And this sounding is going on 13 hours old….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...