Msalgado Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 NWS Tulsa: From storm survey team: Boswell #OKwx tornado to be rated EF3, w/max winds 135-145 mph Hugo OK tornado to be rated EF1, w/max winds 95-105 I thought Boswell and Hugo might have had the same tornado. I guess not. same storm, but SW of Boswell it was a wedge that pulled up. I couldn't stay on after that, but it was a cone the last time I saw and it looked to be roping out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewxmann Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 Public Information StatementNational Weather Service Norman OK302 PM CDT WED MAY 11 2016...NWS Damage Survey for 05/09/16 Tornado Event - Update 2....Update...Adding surveyed tornadoes northwest of Stillwater andin eastern Bryan County..Overview...This is very preliminary information from damagesurveys conducted on tuesday. additional analysis will continuefor these and other tornadoes that occurred on monday and someof the specific information may be modified as this analysiscontinues..Katie tornado...Rating: EF-4Estimated Peak Wind: 166-175 MPHPath length /Statute/: 9 MilesPath width /Maximum/: To be determinedFatalities: 1Injuries: 0Start date: May 9 2016Start time: 406 PM CDTStart location: 1.25 S Katie /Garvin County/ OKEnd date: May 9 2016End time: 427 PM CDTEnd location: 8 E Katie /Garvin County/ OKSurvey Summary: The tornado developed about 1.25 miles south ofKatie, or about 4 miles north of Hennepin, and moved generallyeast-northeast with some fluctuation in the motion. One fatalityoccurred east of Katie toward the end of the tornado path. Thetornado dissipated just before crossing Interstate 35 about 8miles east of Katie, or about 5 miles southwest of Wynnewood. Awell-constructed home was destroyed about 6 miles east of Katieconsistent with an EF-4 damage rating..North of Sulphur tornado...Rating: EF-3Estimated Peak Wind: 150-165 MPHPath length /Statute/: 17 MilesPath width /Maximum/: To be determinedFatalities: 0Injuries: To be determinedStart date: May 9 2016Start time: 434 PM CDTStart location: 4 NNW Davis /Murray County/ OKEnd date: May 9 2016End time: 517 PM CDTEnd location: 2.5 SSW Roff /Pontotoc County/ OKSurvey Summary: The tornado touched down just east of Interstate35 between Wynnewood and Davis and moved generally east, beforeturning east-northeast and dissipating near the Ponotoc/MurrayCounty line between Roff and Hickory..West of Roff anticyclonic tornado...Rating: EF-1Estimated Peak Wind: 100-110 MPHPath length /Statute/: Up to 13 MilesPath width /Maximum/: To be determinedFatalities: 0Injuries: To be determinedStart date: May 9 2016Start time: 445 PM CDTStart location: 6 NNW Sulphur /Murray County/ OKEnd date: May 9 2016End time: 520 PM CDTEnd location: 4 NW Fitzhugh /Pontotoc County/ OKSurvey Summary: An anticyclonic tornado developed about 6 milesnorth-northwest of Sulphur and moved northeast into the southeastcorner of Garvin County and then into western Pontotoc County.The tornado moved to at least a point 5 miles west-northwest ofRoff with damage was likely associated with the tornado continuingnortheast to 4 miles northwest of Fitzhugh..Bromide tornado...Rating: EF-3Estimated Peak Wind: 155-165 MPHPath length /Statute/: 9 MilesPath width /Maximum/: To be determinedFatalities: 1Injuries: To be determinedStart date: May 9 2016Start time: 518 PM CDTStart location: 4 S Connerville /Johnston County/ OKEnd date: May 9 2016End time: 536 PM CDTEnd location: Bromide /Coal County/ OKSurvey Summary: The tornado developed near highway 99 about4 miles south of Connerville, or about 12 miles west-northwest ofWapanucka, and moved east-northeast dissipating on the east sideof Bromide on the Coal-Johnston county line. One fatality occurredat a home southeast of Connerville. The damage survey team indicatedthat the house damage southeast of Connerville was consistent withan EF-3 damage rating..Northwest of Atoka tornado...Rating: EF-1Estimated Peak Wind: 100-110 MPHPath length /Statute/: 12 MilesPath width /Maximum/: To be determinedFatalities: 0Injuries: To be determinedStart date: May 9 2016Start time: 546 PM CDTStart location: 12 WNW Atoka /Atoka County/ OKEnd date: May 9 2016End time: 619 PM CDTEnd location: 5 N Atoka /Atoka County/ OKSurvey Summary: A tornado developed in northwest Atoka Countyabout 12 miles west-northwest of Atoka, or about 6 miles east-northeast of Wapanucka. The tornado moved east-northeastcrossing into southeastern Coal County to the south and southeastof Lehigh, then moved back into Atoka County to the north ofAtoka with the last damage noted near the county line..Northwest of Stillwater tornado...Rating: EF-2Estimated Peak Wind: 115-125 mphPath length /Statute/: 6 MilesPath width /Maximum/: To be determinedFatalities: 0Injuries: To be determinedStart date: May 9 2016Start time: 557 PM CDTStart location: 9 SE Perry /Noble County/ OKEnd date: May 9 2016End time: 617 PM CDTEnd location: 6 WSW Morrison /Noble County/ OKSurvey Summary: A tornado developed near or just northeast ofLake McMurtry and moved northeast across northwest corner ofPayne County and back into Noble County southeast of Morrison.Two homes suffered significant roof damage and a mobile home wasdestroyed northeast of Lake McMurtry. Tree and power line damagecontinued along the duration of the path to the northeast..Southeast of Bennington tornado...Rating: EF-2 in bryan countyEstimated Peak Wind: 111-120 mph in bryan countyPath length /Statute/: 2 Miles in bryan county. 12.7 miles total.Path width /Maximum/: 2500 yards in bryan countyFatalities: 0Injuries: To be determinedStart date: May 9 2016Start time: 624 PM CDTStart location: 4.3 SE Bennington /Bryan County/ OKEnd date: May 9 2016End time: 627 PM CDT moved out of Bryan CountyEnd location: 6 ESE Bennington moved out of Bryan CountySurvey Summary: A tornado developed about 4 miles southeast ofBennington and quickly become very wide. The tornado produced verysignificant tree damage in eastern Bryan County before moving intoChoctaw County at 627 PM. The width was estimated to be 2500 yardswide as the tornado crossed into Choctaw County. Please see informationfrom the National Weather Service Office in Tulsa for detailsof this tornado in Choctaw County.EF Scale: The Enhanced Fujita Scale Classifies Tornadoes intothe following categories.EF0...Weak......65 to 85 MPHEF1...Weak......86 to 110 MPHEF2...Strong....111 to 135 MPHEF3...Strong....136 to 165 MPHEF4...Violent...166 To 200 MPHEF5...Violent...>200 MPHNote:The information in this statement is preliminary and subject tochange pending final review of the event and publication in NWSStorm Data. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewxmann Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENTNATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE TULSA OK237 PM CDT WED MAY 11 2016...NWS DAMAGE SURVEY FOR 05/09/16 TORNADO EVENT....OVERVIEW...A supercell thunderstorm produced several tornadoes inChoctaw County on Monday evening. NWS meteorologists conductedground surveys of the damaged areas yesterday and their findingsfollow..Boswell Tornado...Rating: EF-3Estimated Peak Wind: 135-145 mphPath Length /Statute/: 12.7 miles in Bryan and Choctaw CountiesPath Width /Maximum/: 3100 yardsFatalities: 0Injuries: 2Start Date: May 9 2016Start Time: 624 pm CDTStart Location: 4.3 SE Bennington / Bryan County / OKStart Lat/Lon: 33.9713 / -95.9734End Date: May 9 2016End Time: 642 pm CDTEnd Location: 6.4 ESE Boswell / Choctaw County / OKEnd Lat/Lon: 34.0049 / -95.7588Survey Summary: This tornado developed southeast of Bennington wherenumerous trees were snapped and uprooted. The tornado quickly becamevery large. Tree damage suggested it intensified into the EF-2category before crossing into Choctaw County, which was about 2.3miles into its path. In Choctaw County, the tornado continued towiden, producing a damage path of nearly 1.8 miles across, to thesouthwest of Boswell. The tornado destroyed at least three mobilehomes. Two injuries occurred in one of the mobile homes, one of whichwas critical. Numerous homes were damaged by this tornado, with theworst damage including major loss of the roof structure and collapseof a few exterior walls. Numerous outbuildings were also destroyed. Ametal high-voltage transmission tower/truss was destroyed, andnumerous power poles were snapped. Many trees were snapped anduprooted in the path; trees in several areas were reduced toshortened trunks with short stumps where large limbs existed..Hugo Tornado...Rating: EF-1Estimated Peak Wind: 95-105 mphPath Length /Statute/: 6.1 milesPath Width /Maximum/: 650 yardsFatalities: 0Injuries: 0Start Date: May 9 2016Start Time: 702 pm CDTStart Location: 3.1 W Hugo / Choctaw County / OKStart Lat/Lon: 34.0107 / -95.5699End Date: May 9 2016End Time: 710 pm CDTEnd Location: 3 E Hugo / Choctaw County / OKEnd Lat/Lon: 34.0148 / -95.4649Survey Summary: This tornado developed west of Hugo and movedeastward across the town. Numerous homes and businesses weredamaged, trees were uprooted, signs were blown down, and storagebuildings were destroyed..Hugo Lake Tornado...Rating: EF-0Estimated Peak Wind: unknown (no known damage)Path Length /Statute/: 6 miles (estimated)Path Width /Maximum/: 150 yards (estimated)Fatalities: 0Injuries: 0Start Date: May 9 2016Start Time: 718 pm CDTStart Location: 6.3 NW Sawyer / Choctaw County / OKStart Lat/Lon: 34.0770 / -95.4526End Date: May 9 2016End Time: 730 pm CDTEnd Location: 2.4 S Spencerville / Choctaw County / OKEnd Lat/Lon: 34.1008 / -95.3468Survey Summary: Storm chasers and storm spotters witnessed thistornado, which remained over Lake Hugo for much of its life. Theground survey team investigated accessible areas of land on both thewest and east sides of the lake and could find no damage. Therefore,much of the detail above is estimated based on observer accounts andradar data. There are reports of a satellite tornado occurring withthe storm at the same time this tornado is occurring.EF Scale: The enhanced Fujita scale classifies tornadoes into thefollowing categories.EF0...weak......65 To 85 mphEF1...weak......86 to 110 mphEF2...strong....111 to 135 mphEF3...strong....136 to 165 mphEF4...violent...166 to 200 mphEF5...violent...>200 mphNote:The information in this statement is preliminary and subject to changepending final review of the events and publication in NWS Storm Data. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinook Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 NWS Shreveport surveyed two EF-1 tornadoes in Bowie County, TX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Msalgado Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Best shot I got of the Boswell tornado. 1.8 miles wide at its max. Biggest tornado I've ever seen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherextreme Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Public Information StatementNational Weather Service Paducah, KY848 PM CDT WED MAY 11 2016...NWS Damage Survey for 5/10/2016 TornadoEvent for Graves and Marshall counties of KY.Rating: EF-3Estimated peak wind: 140 mphPath length /Statute/: 19 milesPath width /Maximum/: 450 yardsFatalities: 0Injuries: 10Start date: May_10_2016Start time: 244 PM (Estimated)Start location: 6 miles West of Mayfield KY along Lewis RdEnd date: May_10_2016End time: 324 PM (Estimated)End location: 4.5 miles Southwest of Benton KY - East of Bondurant LaneSURVEY SUMMARY: Dozens of structures including mobile homes,businesses, barns and garages were destroyed. Several homes receivedmajor damage or were destroyed. Many dozens of other homes andbusinesses received minor damage, mainly loss of shingles and facia.Several dozen cars were damaged or destroyed. Some cars were tossedaround and lofted atop other cars or stuctures. Thousands of treeswere snapped, uprooted, or broken. The tornado was captured on videoor camera by numerous individuals. The tornado was reported to havehad more than 1 vortex at several different points along its path inboth Graves and Marshall counties.EF Scale: The Enhanced Fujita Scale ClassifiesTornadoes into the following categories.EF0...Weak......65 to 85 mphEF1...Weak......86 to 110 mphEF2...Strong....111 to 135 mphEF3...Strong....136 to 165 mphEF4...Violent...166 To 200 mphEF5...Violent...>200 mph* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherextreme Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Another one from 5/9/16 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OUGrad05 Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Monday really emphasizes how much SRH can impact storms, even small differences compared with setups earlier this year that had much higher CAPE but limited shear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdgwx Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Monday really emphasizes how much SRH can impact storms, even small differences compared with setups earlier this year that had much higher CAPE but limited shear. Yeah. To put SRH in perspective consider it's role in the energy budget of a thunderstorm. A typical 0-3 km CAPE value in EF2+ environments is 100-250 j/kg. The typical SRH is often in excess of 250 m2/s2. Remember that m2/s2 is the same thing as j/kg so CAPE and SRH have the exact same units. SRH can thus be interpreted as an energy density the same way CAPE can. It is the storm relative kinetic energy which is specifically configured in a manner that a storm can easily convert it into a vertical pressure perturbation and/or vorticity that are aligned to favor strong mesocyclones and eventually tornadoes. There was a paper (by Emmanuel I think) and which Howard Bluestein's book Severe Convective Storms and Tornadoes reproduces with an equation that showed that wind shear can and often is the dominating energy source for driving updraft velocities in mature supercells. But, it's also a delicate balancing act. Too little shear and the storm will collapse in on itself; too much and it will rip the storm apart. But, if it's just right it can make the thunderstorm super strong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nwohweather Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Monday really emphasizes how much SRH can impact storms, even small differences compared with setups earlier this year that had much higher CAPE but limited shear. I guess it's all about where you live but as someone who has lived in the Great Lakes their whole life I can tell you it's all about the shear. Rarely do we get CAPE in excess of 2000 J/KG here but when you get a 990-995 mb low with a LLJ ripping through, that's when things get real dicey for us up here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OUGrad05 Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 I guess it's all about where you live but as someone who has lived in the Great Lakes their whole life I can tell you it's all about the shear. Rarely do we get CAPE in excess of 2000 J/KG here but when you get a 990-995 mb low with a LLJ ripping through, that's when things get real dicey for us up here Shear is important everywhere for tornadoes. More important than CAPE in my opinion. There seems to be plenty of evidence supporting that as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherextreme Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Saw this posted from another forum, and thought it was interesting enough to also post it here. I just saw a post on Facebook from Tim Marshall regarding the Sulphur, OK tornado on Monday, May 9th. The post is as follows:"stunning NWS Doppler radar images of the giant Sulphur tornado. Yes, there's an anticyclonic tornado (white dot) northeast of the cyclonic tornado. I've never seen an anticyclonic tornado in a rain-filled forward flank downdraft before. It traveled 12 miles ! Anyone have any pictures of the anticyclonic tornado ?Thanks to Stu Ostro. (FYI: base reflectivity on left, radial velocity on right)" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OUGrad05 Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Saw this posted from another forum, and thought it was interesting enough to also post it here. I just saw a post on Facebook from Tim Marshall regarding the Sulphur, OK tornado on Monday, May 9th. The post is as follows: "stunning NWS Doppler radar images of the giant Sulphur tornado. Yes, there's an anticyclonic tornado (white dot) northeast of the cyclonic tornado. I've never seen an anticyclonic tornado in a rain-filled forward flank downdraft before. It traveled 12 miles ! Anyone have any pictures of the anticyclonic tornado ? Thanks to Stu Ostro. (FYI: base reflectivity on left, radial velocity on right)" Wow, that is very cool. Thank you for sharing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nwohweather Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 Shear is important everywhere for tornadoes. More important than CAPE in my opinion. There seems to be plenty of evidence supporting that as well. Oh I know that. I'm just saying forecasting my whole life in an area that sees little instability compared to the Plains you see almost all the time nothing but high shear events Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brettjrob Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 May 16: we can't get the synoptic warm front to lift past the Red River because temps across OK are in the 40s and 50s for the second straight afternoon (per 00z NAM). Medium range looks lukewarm at best heading into the true heart of the season. We'll need a 2008-style turnaround at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjc3395 Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 Yeah it's looking pretty bad at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Reimer Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 May 16: we can't get the synoptic warm front to lift past the Red River because temps across OK are in the 40s and 50s for the second straight afternoon (per 00z NAM). Medium range looks lukewarm at best heading into the true heart of the season. We'll need a 2008-style turnaround at this point. After Monday I'm content with my season. Quality over quantity seems to have won again. We'll see what the last week of May and first week of June can bring. Its obvious at this point that most of the 'chaseable' tornadoes will be produced from mesoscale accidents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brettjrob Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 After Monday I'm content with my season. Quality over quantity seems to have won again. We'll see what the last week of May and first week of June can bring. Its obvious at this point that most of the 'chaseable' tornadoes will be produced from mesoscale accidents. Yeah, my decision to blast south at the first towers Monday may have been the most pivotal season-changing one I've ever made so nonchalantly, if things continue down the path progs suggest for the next 7-10 days. Usual disclaimer: June, and even Memorial Day weekend, are too far out to have much of any predictability. Season's certainly not over, but the window for finally getting a series of big synoptically-evident events south of the OK/KS border is beginning to narrow. In other words, a 2004 or 2010 scenario for the southern states is becoming unlikely. It's been so long since we had a truly big June (outside localized, subtle setups ala Pilger/Coleridge) that it's hard to stay optimistic, but one of these years it'll happen again. EDIT: Just realized I'm posting in the wrong event thread - this was all supposed to be in the May 16 one! Probably for the best since we're just moaning again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewxmann Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 Here's one of the slider homes that Tim Marshall talks about a lot: https://500px.com/photo/153369979/house-moved-by-ef-4-tornado-off-foundation-into-ro-by-jazz-bishop?ctx_page=1&from=user&user_id=7333771 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torchageddon Posted May 19, 2016 Share Posted May 19, 2016 This reminds me a little bit of the Wynnewood, Oklahoma tornado today and the Hesston F5 tornado from 1990. They both sound similar. Pause the Wynnewood tornado vid at 0:19 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1b1pW6HuUY Pause the Hesston tornado vid at 2:38. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCUHtyFcRUI I can't tell if that is a house in the Wynnewood tornado but we know that is a house in the Hesston tornado. I think that is a house in the Wynnewood tornado but in Hesston it does hit buildings and standing objects however I knew when (timestamp) it was referenced you were talking about the mound of powdered concrete that got sucked right in from a greater than average distance. That's according to Twister: Fury on the Plains and to me that looks like powdered/dirt something. Alot of the really good footage is cut and edited to provide exclusivity to the entities willing to purchase it's rights. At least that's my guess. That being said, I really have no problem with this considering that chasing can be an expensive venture. The majority of chasers provide valuable spotting information to entities capable of spreading information to mass amounts of citizens, so I have no problem with the monetization of some of their footage. I don't know if that's the real reason, I see it all the time in amateur footage too where they aren't looking for dollars. Usually its just to use the footage on TV and have no watermark, extra historic footage being kept behind a curtain would be uncouth to all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hm8 Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 The 212 mph radar image... https://twitter.com/karen_kosiba/status/733735199486414850 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.