Chicago Storm Posted April 24, 2016 Author Share Posted April 24, 2016 For Tuesday, the concerns are warranted in light of how incredibly hyped this event has been from a week out. It's probably among the most hyped I can ever remember from that early on, and I'm beginning to seriously doubt it will fulfill those lofty expectations. Yes, there's huge CAPE and a big trough coming in, and there will probably be some tornadoes. But it's all relative to expectations, which couldn't be higher, for a lot of the community. A couple days ago, I said the caveats for this setup didn't really look any worse than they did from the same lead time for 4/14/12. That's clearly no longer the case -- there are serious issues showing up on virtually all the current progs. The cyclone is occluding too early, and unless that trend reverses quickly, it will limit the threat of a dryline tornado outbreak considerably. There could still be tornadic supercells on the dryline, but probably not extremely long-track violent tornadoes. Closer to the WF (anywhere from C KS to C NE/W IA, depending on what you believe) still looks pretty ominous, and may end up being the real bullseye if trends hold. Agree with the above.VBV, crossovers, and capping are all concerns of mine, among other things. The triple point/near WF area is where I'm eyeing at thing point. Looks like an increasing consensus of that being in NE/SW. IA/NE. KS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capbreak Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 The one nice thing about this setup now is that playing the warm front vs the dryline is an easier decision as someone not coming up from OK/TX. With capping we also probably won't have any early convection messing up the warm front either, like we did on 4/14/12. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OUGrad05 Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 GFS at 00z wednesday has surface winds with a SW component in OKC...I'm thinking this is due to convection...any thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jojo762 Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 GFS at 00z wednesday has surface winds with a SW component in OKC...I'm thinking this is due to convection...any thoughts? Looks like it could be convectively caused, but also, it looks as though OKC is ever so slightly west of the dryline, if not right under it on the 12Z GFS @00Z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildwestpb Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 Looks like it could be convectively caused, but also, it looks as though OKC is ever so slightly west of the dryline, if not right under it on the 12Z GFS @00Z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OUGrad05 Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 Looks like it could be convectively caused, but also, it looks as though OKC is ever so slightly west of the dryline, if not right under it on the 12Z GFS @00Z. What it looked like to me...I can't see the counties on mine for some reason, so I was just guessing location when I clicked... GFS has sped things up a reasonable amount over prior runs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OUGrad05 Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 Also, the Euro has pushed the low several hundred miles further north this run... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdgwx Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 The 12Z NAM not showing much convection even by 0Z is only mildly noteworthy to me to right now. That can and probably will change as we get closer. The more interesting mitigating factors are a weakening mid level jet streak, mid level winds with a significant southern component, 0-6km shear that really isn't that impressive, 0-1 SRH that is actually astonishingly low relative to the hype. This isn't what high risk outbreaks are made of. Call me conservative, but unless we start seeing an uptick in favorable outbreak conditions I have to agree with the others that current data does not support the hype. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OUGrad05 Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 The 12Z NAM not showing much convection even by 0Z is only mildly noteworthy to me to right now. That can and probably will change as we get closer. The more interesting mitigating factors are a weakening mid level jet streak, mid level winds with a significant southern component, 0-6km shear that really isn't that impressive, 0-1 SRH that is actually astonishingly low relative to the hype. This isn't what high risk outbreaks are made of. Call me conservative, but unless we start seeing an uptick in favorable outbreak conditions I have to agree with the others that current data does not support the hype. Helicity values are very low. CAPE will be enough to fuel some significant storms, probably an EF2 tornado along the way...but hard to see long lived tornadoes with the current setup, at least in OK. Things better come together quickly.... Looks to be a monster hail event though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyhb Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 The 12Z NAM not showing much convection even by 0Z is only mildly noteworthy to me to right now. That can and probably will change as we get closer. The more interesting mitigating factors are a weakening mid level jet streak, mid level winds with a significant southern component, 0-6km shear that really isn't that impressive, 0-1 SRH that is actually astonishingly low relative to the hype. This isn't what high risk outbreaks are made of. Call me conservative, but unless we start seeing an uptick in favorable outbreak conditions I have to agree with the others that current data does not support the hype. Even near the triple point through 00z, these values are quite low, which is pretty damning for the whole thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jojo762 Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 Eh. 200+m2/s2 of 0-1KM SRH at and after 00Z along the DL in KS/OK certainly isn't that high, but it's not absolutely terrible... Perhaps what is more unimpressive is 0-3KM SRH may not reach or be much better at all than 250m2/s2. However, previous runs, like from yesterday, did have better-- and in certain cases much better-- SRH. Not trending in the right direction today... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jojo762 Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 MESOSCALE DISCUSSION 0437NWS STORM PREDICTION CENTER NORMAN OK0150 PM CDT SUN APR 24 2016AREAS AFFECTED...CNTRL KS INTO NWRN OKCONCERNING...SEVERE POTENTIAL...WATCH LIKELYVALID 241850Z - 242115ZPROBABILITY OF WATCH ISSUANCE...80 PERCENTSUMMARY...WIDELY SCATTERED CONVECTIVE INITIATION IS LIKELY DURINGTHE 20-22Z PERIOD OVER KS AND ISOLATED CONVECTIVE INITIATION ISPROBABLE DURING THE 22-01Z PERIOD FROM THE KS-OK BORDER REGION SWDINTO OK. LARGE TO VERY LARGE HAIL WILL BE POSSIBLE WITH STRONGERUPDRAFTS THAT DEVELOP INTO SUPERCELLS. A MODEST WEAK-TORNADO RISKWILL BE CONFINED TO THE EARLY EVENING /23-02Z/ WHEN LOW-LEVEL SHEARSTRENGTHENS AND TEMP/DEWPOINT SPREADS LOWER.DISCUSSION...18Z SURFACE ANALYSIS PLACES A SHARPENINGDRYLINE/CONFLUENT LOW-LEVEL FLOW FROM 25 MI W RSL SWD ALONG THETX-OK BORDER. DEWPOINTS HAVE RISEN INTO THE 59-62 DEG F RANGEDURING THE PAST FEW HOURS IN W-CNTRL OK PER OK MESONET OBSERVATIONS.STRONG HEATING COUPLED WITH GRADUAL MOISTENING ARE CONTRIBUTING TOMODERATE BUOYANCY. WATER VAPOR IMAGERY SHOWS A WELL-DEFINEDMID-LEVEL VORTICITY MAXIMUM ROTATING THROUGH THE BASE OFLARGER-SCALE TROUGH ACROSS W-CNTRL KS EARLY THIS AFTERNOON. THISFEATURE WILL MOVE INTO CNTRL AND ERN PORTIONS OF KS/S-CNTRL NEB BYLATE AFTERNOON. THE TRAILING PORTION OF THIS FEATURE AND IMPLIEDWEAK ASCENT WILL SPREAD ACROSS NWRN OK DURING THE LATEAFTERNOON/EARLY EVENING.SURFACE OBSERVATIONS DURING THE PAST FEW HOURS IMPLY THE SPCRAP-BASED OBJECTIVE ANALYSES ARE SUFFERING FROM THE RAP OVER-MIXINGDRY BIAS YIELDING AN UNDER-REPRESENTATION OF LOW-LEVEL MOISTURE.WRF-BASED GUIDANCE /PARTICULARLY THE NAM/ APPEARS TO EXHIBIT A MOREREASONABLE SOLUTION REGARDING MOISTURE/MIXING AND SUBSEQUENT CAPEROSION AND CONVECTIVE INITIATION PROCESSES.CONVECTIVE INITIATION WILL LIKELY OCCUR FIRST ACROSS CNTRL KS ALONGTHE DRYLINE AND GRADUALLY INCLUDE AREAS FARTHER S ALONG THE KS/OKBORDER BY LATE THIS AFTERNOON AND INTO NWRN OK DURING THE EARLYEVENING HOURS. DEEP SHEAR VECTORS ORIENTED ORTHOGONAL TO THESURFACE BOUNDARIES COUPLED WITH EFFECTIVE SHEAR MAGNITUDES OF 40-50KT WILL FAVOR DISCRETE SUPERCELL MODE WITH THE STRONGER/SUSTAINEDUPDRAFTS. LOW-LEVEL SHEAR /I.E. SRH/ RISES INTO THE 100-250 M2/S2RANGE DURING THE 23-02Z PERIOD AND WILL GENERALLY COINCIDE WITH SOMEWEAK TORNADO POTENTIAL WITH ANY STRONGER/SUSTAINED SUPERCELL.STRENGTHENING CONVECTIVE INHIBITION AFTER 01-02Z WILL TEND TORESTRICT STORM INTENSITY/COVERAGE THIS EVENING AS MOST OF THEACTIVITY DIMINISHES...SMITH/CORFIDI.. 04/24/2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinook Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 A little off topic here, but Pivotalweather now has three different WRF models. Reflectivity, CAPE, and updraft helicity are the only forecast fields. (WRFARW, WRF-NMMB) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OUGrad05 Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 Eh. 200+m2/s2 of 0-1KM SRH at and after 00Z along the DL in KS/OK certainly isn't that high, but it's not absolutely terrible... Perhaps what is more unimpressive is 0-3KM SRH may not reach or be much better at all than 250m2/s2. However, previous runs, like from yesterday, did have better-- and in certain cases much better-- SRH. Not trending in the right direction today... 200+m2/s2 is adequate for tornadoes for sure, but not indicative of some sort of massive outbreak and isn't really supportive for widespread strong or violent tornadoes...one offs are always possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jojo762 Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 Might be somewhat interesting here in a bit. Looks like initiation should take place soon across SW/SC KS, probably somewhere near KPTT and KGBD, also some nice looking CU in NW OK. Here is the UH-tracks for today from the 18Z HRRR. HRRR has been persistent for much of today in showing a nice supercell going north of ICT and into EC/SC KS. Obviously the parameters are not anything too impressive, but still might get a couple nice supercells toward 00z. Storms will be pretty high based at first given pretty high LCLs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonbo Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 Staying near Omaha until Tuesday (pending models, Wednesday) with family and I'll be enjoying the next few days. Hoping the largest hail of today doesn't dump over me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jojo762 Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 A little off topic here, but Pivotalweather now has three different WRF models. Reflectivity, CAPE, and updraft helicity are the only forecast fields. Pretty useful stuff. The WRF-NSSL on there actually has a lot more forecasts fields than just those three. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinook Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 Pretty useful stuff. The WRF-NSSL on there actually has a lot more forecasts fields than just those three. Yes, I just edited that post because it just saw those forecast fields. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jojo762 Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 Looks like CI just occurred near KGBD... Lets see if today does anything decent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted April 24, 2016 Author Share Posted April 24, 2016 Looking over 12z ECMWF soundings, the VBV issue is quite sig. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattPetrulli Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 Yeah the storms are going up rather quick around the Great Bend area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinook Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 GRLevel3 can now show a hydrometeor-classification of "large hail" and "giant hail" for the KICT radar only. More details (GRLevel3 owner forum) http://www.grlevelx.com/owners/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=9704 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildwestpb Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 URGENT - IMMEDIATE BROADCAST REQUESTED TORNADO WATCH NUMBER 102 NWS STORM PREDICTION CENTER NORMAN OK 300 PM CDT SUN APR 24 2016 THE NWS STORM PREDICTION CENTER HAS ISSUED A * TORNADO WATCH FOR PORTIONS OF CENTRAL AND EASTERN KANSAS NORTHERN OKLAHOMA * EFFECTIVE THIS SUNDAY AFTERNOON AND EVENING FROM 300 PM UNTIL 1100 PM CDT. * PRIMARY THREATS INCLUDE... A COUPLE TORNADOES POSSIBLE WIDESPREAD LARGE HAIL EXPECTED WITH ISOLATED VERY LARGE HAIL EVENTS TO 3 INCHES IN DIAMETER LIKELY SCATTERED DAMAGING WINDS LIKELY WITH ISOLATED SIGNIFICANT GUSTS TO 75 MPH POSSIBLE SUMMARY...A FEW SUPERCELL STORMS WITH A THREAT FOR VERY LARGE HAIL...LOCALLY DAMAGING WIND...AND A TORNADO OR TWO EXPECTED TO DEVELOP AND MOVE GENERALLY EAST-NORTHEAST ACROSS CENTRAL AND EASTERN KANSAS LATER TODAY INTO TONIGHT. A MORE ISOLATED SEVERE THREAT SOUTHWARD INTO PARTS OF OKLAHOMA ALSO MAY PERSIST THROUGH LATER TONIGHT. THE TORNADO WATCH AREA IS APPROXIMATELY ALONG AND 75 STATUTE MILES EAST AND WEST OF A LINE FROM 60 MILES NORTH OF MANHATTAN KANSAS TO 25 MILES WEST SOUTHWEST OF ENID OKLAHOMA. FOR A COMPLETE DEPICTION OF THE WATCH SEE THE ASSOCIATED WATCH OUTLINE UPDATE (WOUS64 KWNS WOU2). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jojo762 Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 18Z NAM is much more impressive across the dryline in OK and near the triple-point. It is a tad further west, so it keeps I-35 in play. This is at 03Z in NC OK... The best window for tornadoes may be relatively confined to a few hours though, as VBV becomes an issue later on in the night it appears. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattPetrulli Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 18Z NAM is much more impressive across the dryline in OK and near the triple-point. It is a tad further west, so it keeps I-35 in play. This is at 03Z in NC OK... Yeah 18z NAM is a lot better for Central OK and triple point and breathes new hope into the setup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattPetrulli Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 Just a note, if this doesn't bust, this better be called the "I-35 Tornado Outbreak" and not April 26, 2016. This due to too many outbreaks that have happened on this date. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jojo762 Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 Just a note, if this doesn't bust, this better be called the "I-35 Tornado Outbreak" and not April 26, 2016. This due to too many outbreaks that have happened on this date. But there has been so many different I-35 Tornado Outbreaks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jojo762 Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 Pretty nice view on the StormScapeLIVE.TV stream, storm has organized a decent amount recently. Wall Cloud now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZackH Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 It's nice to see the surface cyclone actually deepening in a cursory glance at the 18z NAM. The 500mb flow also seems to be a little less meridional with more of a southwesterly component over most of KS and OK. Right now I personally like the triple point and just south of the triple point on the dryline. There is a really nice bulge that should enhance convergence. Still... The flow is really amplified... More than I'd like to see but this would be chaseable. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattPetrulli Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 But there has been so many different I-35 Tornado Outbreaks? Yeah, but none are notably called the I-35 Tornado Outbreak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.