psuhoffman Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 at this point, who cares hard to get screwed around here when you're talking March 4 don't get me wrong, I'd like to see the snow, but the fact is, outside of the blizzard, this year has found many ways to not snow, at least in and around I95 I don't know "who cares" but judging from all the posts in here some must a little. Personally I agree with you. I am kind of close to moving on on this. I am giving it another couple model cycles to perhaps trend towards something more then a last pity event, I really have no interest in investing much time on a 1-2" march event. But I was just providing analysis of what the situation is, not what I want it to be. It sucks that after getting systems that were moisture bombs over and over when they were cutters that we have a 5 day window and both systems look to be pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scraff Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 What's going on here today? Can't believe what I've been reading. For such a snow starved crowd (me included), I'm not sure why everyone's not wishcasting harder! Has everyone given up!? Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaltimoreWxGuy Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 das was completely joking... Ah, tough to pick up on it sometimes on the internet. Ha...but still, some Meteorologists do think that though.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dtk Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Maybe the first problem is the lack of agreement between certified meteorologists lol....Final call-a coating-2" for the entire area mainly on cold stuff Sarcasm fail..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 gfs is now taking accumulating snows into PA.....next (winter) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dtk Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Ah, tough to pick up on it sometimes on the internet. Ha...but still, some Meteorologists do think that though.. And any meteorologist that thinks/says/types that needs to take a NWP and DA training course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
das Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Sarcasm fail..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomeguyfromTakomaPark Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Surface still looking pretty marginal for DC. T-2 inches mostly on grassy/colder surfaces final call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowman. Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 The 12z GFS improved a bit for the N and W suburbs.. pretty meh for DC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ers-wxman1 Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 1-3" N and W of DC. 4" at best near the Mason Dixon. Per 12z GFS. Some of this will be lost to initial warm ground. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Surface still looking pretty marginal for DC. T-2 inches mostly on grassy/colder surfaces final call. GFS has a tendency to run a bit warm. Might be right in this case but hard to say. Euro twins run the 32 line along 95 in the wee hours. Seems like a typical UHI and SE locations will struggle with surface and very marginal north and west with the typical colder spots being cold enough to easily accumulate. This storm has never shown much upside beyond 4" the last few days across all guidance. I've had an imaginary cap of 4" in my brain for max potential. I could still see a lucky location getting that with the bulk of the region in T-3" range. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cae Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 At this point I'm pulling for a psuhoffman jackpot. He deserves it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDstorm Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 At this point I'm pulling for a psuhoffman jackpot. He deserves it. With this system, any "jackpot' is going to be like church bingo winnings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warm Nose Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 So, T with T lost to warm ground? Sounds about right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 So, T with T lost to warm ground? Sounds about right. would be a top 5 event of the winter! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowfan Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 No white ground east of the fall line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interstate Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Told you we should have not made a storm thread.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmericanWxFreak Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Told you we should have not made a storm thread.... Barely anything has changed since we have made the thread.... when was this not a 1-3 deal except for a juicy run or two of the gfs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastCoast NPZ Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 How is that even possible? You are 10 or 11 miles SE of me. You had to pass 30 inches with the blizzard? Nope. 28" with the blizzard and only 1.9" combined with the rest of the winter. There was a distinct cut-off south of Winchester with that storm. I was lucky enough to be just on the south fringe of the heavy AM bands that clobbered Winchester and north. I got noticeably more at my house than there was in Middletown where I work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Oh no where did all that snow go on the cmc??? I feel awful for all the snow weenies to our northeast who justifiably swore the cmc was holding each run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlaskaETC Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Meh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interstate Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Meh What does even mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ers-wxman1 Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 The 12z GEFS doesn't look to bad for us. The coastal looks a touch closer to the coast and a bit further north than east vs the op. Main vort pass still looks ok. Definitely backs up the 1-3", locally 4 N and W Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravensrule Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 I thought my posts are bad, and then i read this thread . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 I thought my posts are bad, and then i read this thread . last page has been pretty bad. But so has this thing we're tracking. It was a complete time-suck it looks like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Euro is backing off on strong confluence north of us fairly early (48 hours) compared to 0z. Might not make much difference but it should be a little less squashed this run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Euro is backing off on strong confluence north of us fairly early (48 hours) compared to 0z. Might not make much difference but it should be a little less squashed this run. at 54 hrs., seems like it's consolidating it into 1 low Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravensrule Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 last page has been pretty bad. But so has this thing we're tracking. It was a complete time-suck it looks like. I'm wasting my time and i won't even be here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WEATHER53 Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 It's still a good event as this will not be the classic transfer that hurts DC so often It's pass by and what I mean is that as the low moves eastward from KY it will also be trying to gain latitude so it does not just die and jump but rather most of the precip shield to the north will stay intact Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 meh, at 60 hrs it just took the low into central Miss/GA from western KY at 54 hrs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.