Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Winter Storm March 1st-2nd (Part 2)


Powerball

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 841
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Just measured 5" here at home with drifts up to 18". So surprisingly this is my largest storm of the year for home.

 

Interesting.

 

I had measured only ~3.2" here (not including the 0.3" of frontogenesis snows from early in the morning), and I would have only guessed another 1/2" or so with the last round of deformation snows.

 

Thus, totals were roughly ~4" here. That's what the Roseville spotter also seemed to have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just under 5 inches here.  normally when the thumb area in MI cleans up and se MI suffers we do well like the thumb..  Not the case the last two storms by any means.  Silly winter, but for being one of the warmest on record it could have been worse..  There was plenty to track but the tracks didn't track too favorable most of the times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How did Buffalo do with the SE trend and Indices warning signs?

Is this directed towards me? I said Detroit and Toronto would be favored and I was correct aside from it being a little bit north/northwest of Detroit for jackpot areas. Also called this a week before the storm hit when most of the favored areas on models were north of Chicago near your location. These new posters got a lot of spunk eh? ^_^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this directed towards me? I said Detroit and Toronto would be favored and I was correct aside from it being a little bit north/northwest of Detroit for jackpot areas. Also called this a week before the storm hit when most of the favored areas on models were north of Chicago near your location. These new posters got a lot of spunk eh? ^_^

 

I was curious how the storm track ended up playing out out that way in the end.  I hadn't  no time yesterday to track it as I was  at work and was wondering for now and going forward what some of the possibilities were as to why we did better in round 2 than one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finished with 6.5" here. Bit of a let down, just barely ends up as our largest event of the season (had a 6.0" LE event in January).

Saw some reports nearing a foot from Aliston, ON so at least someone cashed in. But overall I'd say the models overdid the snow big time. System was hauling ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting.

 

I had measured only ~3.2" here (not including the 0.3" of frontogenesis snows from early in the morning), and I would have only guessed another 1/2" or so with the last round of deformation snows.

 

Thus, totals were roughly ~4" here. That's what the Roseville spotter also seemed to have.

Yeah I was quite surprised when I pulled out my ruler and measured the drifts along side the house.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...