Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Models Have Us On Northern Edge Of Snow 3/4/16


bluewave

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

http://www.opc.ncep.noaa.gov/Atl_tab.shtml

 

Highlighted for Clarity

 

48hr surface map from the OPC

---two day storm window---

 

That 1025mb High prog in the Southeast 

is what we need to clear off the coast .....

for us to have a shot at something good -imho

 

I will post the updated 96hr when it is released

 

 

It shouldn't take much of a shift in the precip field for a very nice hit

 

prec_f120_ussm.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come on guys!! What's been the trend all winter???? I'm happy the euro is out to sea. Let's just prevent a cutter

"Let us prevent a cutter?"  Didn't realize we had that power...

 

Cracks me up that people don't want to be in the bullseye.  I want to be in the bullseye every run of every model.  Models become more and more accurate as they approach the event, often fluctuating somewhat around the final track/solution, but you always want to be in the bullseye, unless there is a known, documented systemic error with a model under very specific conditions and I don't think I've seen anyone show that yet.  I wish we'd show the overall "forecast" like the NHC does with tropical systems, i.e., with a "cone of uncertainty" around a track.  I guess the hard part is, with a tropical system, the storm has already formed, whereas with most potential east coast storms, the low sometimes doesn't even form, per se, until the day before the event.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Let us prevent a cutter?" Didn't realize we had that power...

Cracks me up that people don't want to be in the bullseye. I want to be in the bullseye every run of every model. Models become more and more accurate as they approach the event, often fluctuating somewhat around the final track/solution, but you always want to be in the bullseye, unless there is a known, documented systemic error with a model under very specific conditions and I don't think I've seen anyone show that yet. I wish we'd show the overall "forecast" like the NHC does with tropical systems, i.e., with a "cone of uncertainty" around a track. I guess the hard part is, with a tropical system, the storm has already formed, whereas with most potential east coast storms, the low sometimes doesn't even form, per se, until the day before the event.

We'll see that's the underlying problem here. People practice modelogy rather then meteorology. The WAR has been consistently stronger then modeled all winter. Thus pretty much every storm had been west and north of the 120 hour forecasts. I fully believe this is a big hit. A blue bomb for the coast and a MEC inland and elevated just as I have been saying would happen since last falls if I'm wrong I'll eat my words

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Let us prevent a cutter?" Didn't realize we had that power...

Cracks me up that people don't want to be in the bullseye. I want to be in the bullseye every run of every model. Models become more and more accurate as they approach the event, often fluctuating somewhat around the final track/solution, but you always want to be in the bullseye, unless there is a known, documented systemic error with a model under very specific conditions and I don't think I've seen anyone show that yet. I wish we'd show the overall "forecast" like the NHC does with tropical systems, i.e., with a "cone of uncertainty" around a track. I guess the hard part is, with a tropical system, the storm has already formed, whereas with most potential east coast storms, the low sometimes doesn't even form, per se, until the day before the event.

Well we was never in the bullseye until last minute for the January blizzard. Only the NAM had us in the bullseye
Link to comment
Share on other sites

102 hours is an eternity, a 50-70 mile shift on 3 out of the next 4 model suites and everyone is seeing snow

 

 

Just look at the cluster at 102 at OBX vs the 0Z cluster at 114 .( CAN`T POST ) There are many  more members are now at OBX .

The difference is night and day .  The EURO lets up on the confluence earlier in the run I think will do it later on as well . 

It is already showing signs of releasing to the N .

 

Take a look at SLP at 78 vs the 0z run at 90 when it is in the M/W  the Euro . Look how many members are in the N Tenn valley with some member now into S ILL . 

 

The trend today has been towards less confluence through N/E and you now see the UKIE which showed 0  yesterday  now sticks LP at OBX at 96 .

 

You can see ridge axis looks good , it`s actually in a good spot . 

So as of right now SLP is coming under the vortex . It will not take much more relaxation for this to come N .

 

 ecmwf-ens_z500a_sd_us_5.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...