Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,589
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Model Mezzanine - 3rd times a charm


Baroclinic Zone

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

gotcha - wonder if just the hardware alone might appease some. 

 

huh, 4D though?   ... I read a long time ago that NCEP did a cross-model experiment between the GFS and Ecm; i think they took the Euro's initialization and fed it to the GFS and the GFS scored a lot better.  

 

either that or I have a remarkable talent for science fiction.  be that as it may, it'll be fascinating to see what comes out of the May upgrade.  

 

wonder why they chose that month?  was that deliberate - heh, i could surmise a scenario where they want put it together during the off calendar time of the year like just in case - lol

 

You're correct. The 4DVAR is superior to the current data assimilation. And this upgrade won't be all the way there either, but at least the GFSX scores show significant improvement over the current 3DVAR.

 

I'm guessing late spring was chosen in order to get a full cold season of parallel ops. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yup...I read the same thing

 

Which is maddening.

 

I mean why do you think Cliff Mass gets so upset about the US handling of NWP? Basically we have a solid model core that we don't invest data assimilation in.

 

Garbage in, garbage out. It's part of the reason why you see wild swings run to run, versus subtle ECMWF movement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which is maddening.

 

I mean why do you think Cliff Mass gets so upset about the US handling of NWP? Basically we have a solid model core that we don't invest data assimilation in.

 

Garbage in, garbage out. It's part of the reason why you see wild swings run to run, versus subtle ECMWF movement.

 

The navgem is 4dvar, isn't it? But people bash the heck out of that model

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The navgem is 4dvar, isn't it? But people bash the heck out of that model

 

Yes it is, but it's also the poorest resolution of the "major" models and thus suffers in the more robust verification statistics (i.e. anomaly correlation since it won't capture the anomalies to the extent higher res models will). There has also not been as much optimization of that model compared to the GFS either.

 

Regardless, a "3.5" DVAR already makes the GFS better. 4DVAR would only further that. That's not to say it improves East Coast cyclogenesis any, but overall the model would get better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're correct. The 4DVAR is superior to the current data assimilation. And this upgrade won't be all the way there either, but at least the GFSX scores show significant improvement over the current 3DVAR.

 

I'm guessing late spring was chosen in order to get a full cold season of parallel ops. 

 yeah that makes sense ... plus, (hahaha) if it suddenly f's up all the time ... no one will notice 'till next October!

 

just kidding 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A nice multi-model compromise should leave us with a moderate cutter followed by a whiff to Bermuda.

 

 

Yes it is, but it's also the poorest resolution of the "major" models and thus suffers in the more robust verification statistics (i.e. anomaly correlation since it won't capture the anomalies to the extent higher res models will). There has also not been as much optimization of that model compared to the GFS either.

 

Regardless, a "3.5" DVAR already makes the GFS better. 4DVAR would only further that. That's not to say it improves East Coast cyclogenesis any, but overall the model would get better.

 

 

Thanks. And hey, I just checked our good friend Navgem at 12z and it shows pretty much exactly the scenario I described above. Good thing it sucks  :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Euro mean is east of the op for the cuttet

It is also more northwest with the coastal . Euro control crushes the coast.

 

know what - I'm embarrassed to say I want to see that solution for my self.  

 

why?  because - I've heard that stated so many times this winter and it's annoying. "control run crushes"   "control run destroys" ... yet, nothing has yet crushed and/or destroyed anything yet - leaving me to ponder what use beyond futility the 'legendary control run' really has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing I'm going to be fascinated to see is how the bias spectrum of the GFS may or may not change once all that happens.  

 

'Magine how weird that would be if it suddenly started doing the same thing as the ECM ? 

 

I would not at all be surprised if that happened. Look at the JMA, another 4dvar model. It follows the Euro, like, a lot.

 

know what - I'm embarrassed to say I want to see that solution for my self.  

 

why?  because - I've heard that stated so many times this winter and it's annoying. "control run crushes"   "control run destroys" ... yet, nothing has yet crushed and/or destroyed anything yet - leaving me to ponder what use beyond futility the 'legendary control run' really has.

 

You know what its purpose is, stop pretending.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

basically, the higher you lift any object the more potential energy it stores...  

 

same thing here:  the higher these runs manage to lift your hopes and spirits, the greater amount they get to claim in sadness and rage when all that good vibe gets instantly converted to kinetic madness as you fall from great great heights and expectations.  

 

don't buy into anything 'positive' looking - how many times must we collectively be beaten over the heads with model lies before we begin to just stop listening to them. 

 

hahaaa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would you say having the EC ensemble improves grids beyond day 4 or 5? Wonder if there is justification for seeing those for you guys.

 

Totally useful for me and X to look at. But the unfortunate part is that we have to take what we see on the web and move the grids towards that, instead of having an EPS grid to blend into the forecast. That would be ideal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally useful for me and X to look at. But the unfortunate part is that we have to take what we see on the web and move the grids towards that, instead of having an EPS grid to blend into the forecast. That would be ideal.

I hear ya. Just trying to see if you can justify that or at least not paying for a vendor to see it lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hear ya. Just trying to see if you can justify that or at least not paying for a vendor to see it lol.

 

I can almost guarantee we're never getting the EPS locally. Nationally WPC may be able to keep it in their system, but even that's not rock solid.

 

Sadly the WeatherBell subscription might be one of the best uses of the office budget in a long time give the amount we use it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...