Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,618
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    RyRyB
    Newest Member
    RyRyB
    Joined

Feb 15-16 Possible Mixed Event.


lilj4425

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

6z GFS Para is looking good.  Nice thump of snow in the upstate at hr 78.

 

And 6 hours later, the cold air is gone.  There was an increase in moisture when the temperatures were colder.  More frozen than the 0z I believe before the changeover.  The NAM should be better at the surface temps.  Next up 12z GFS.  Cross your fingers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought those charts were completely automated using one model (SREF maybe)

Looks like they use the SREF and some other models, but they are automatically generated, nevertheless.

http://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/pwpf/about_pwpf_products.shtml

The probabilistic forecasts found here on the WPC PWPF page are also based on the deterministic WWD accumulation forecasts and are generated automatically using an ensemble of model forecasts along with the WWD forecasts. The automatic nature of this product generation allows an extensive set of displays of probabilities for snowfall or freezing rain exceeding a number of thresholds and accumulations of snowfall or freezing rain for various percentile levels. The percentile amounts and probabilities for 24-hour intervals are generated at six-hour increments through 72 hours. The six-hour increments are made possible by disaggregation of the 24-h human deterministic forecast based on six-hour accumulations from a blend of model guidance selected by the WWD forecaster.

The automatic processing also allows the generation of probabilistic winter precipitation forecasts for 48-h intervals based on 48-h accumulations obtained by adding two 24-h accumulations together. The same method used to compute the 24-h probabilistic products is applied to the 48-h intervals ending at 48 through 72 hours after the initial time. As with the 24-hour forecasts, the 48-h forecasts are produced at six-hour intervals. Finally, a single set of probabilistic forecasts are created for the entire 72-hour period.

A multi-model ensemble is utilized to create a distribution of values around the WPC accumulation at each grid point. The typical constituency of this ensemble is as follows:

26 NCEP Short-Range Ensemble Forecast (SREF) members

25 ECMWF ensemble members, randomly selected

1 NCEP North American Mesoscale (NAM) 12Z (day) or 00Z (night) operational run

1 NCEP Global Forecast System (GFS) 12Z (day) or 00Z (night) operational run

1 European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) latest operational run

1 Canadian Model (CMC) latest operational run

1 ECMWF latest ensemble mean

1 NCEP Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFS) latest ensemble mean (6-h SLRs)

5 NCEP GEFS members, randomly selected

___

62 Total members

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Edit.....I was just looking at precip maps.......SC did much better in later frames.

 

looks like the 12z GFS has NC in the game with a nice wedge (HP looks a lot better) and nice precip, but moisture is too far north for anyone in SC....at least through mid day Monday.  VA and WV doing very good.  Cutter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like there is a pretty good consensus that the high is either out or on its way out before the bulk of the system moves in.  There is not a great consensus on the track of the storm or the timing of when the precip moves in.  The magnitude of this air mass in terms of it being cold and dry is impressive -- not your ordinary weak wedge.  Therefore, we have a greater than normal opportunity for a good hit of front end snow and ice before any changeover occurs, IF we can see precip fall quickly enough.

 

So what we are left with here, since the high is going to be gone, is needing the precip to get in here as early as possible and lock in the wedge.  IF that happens, then we would most likely see the track and/or the redevelopment of the system occur farther south and east than shown.  That's what you want to see, if you are wanting a higher impact winter storm.  If we don't see the precip move in before the high moves well offshore, well, then outside of a few spots, it'll be just another ho hum advisory (maybe) to rain thing.

 

The magnitude of this air mass makes this scenario possible.  That's the only reason this is even worth talking about outside of the mountains.

In some ways this system reminds me of the january 22-23rd ice storm of 2000...except conditions with that one were not ideal either. The departing high was much weaker, worse position and  progressive...The 2000 high was only around 1025 to 1030mb and already was moving/ had moved off shore the mid atlantic by the time precip arrived. (so winds were pretty light at the surface out of the NE),  850mb temps started similar to this one with 0c moving from ga to the nc/va border by the time it was over while warming to 6 to 8c over north ga by 12z of the 23rd,  925 mb temps went from 0c in ne ga  when the precip started to several degrees above freezing overnight,  and the precip didn't start until early to mid afternoon here in georgia. After morning lows around 29 to 31, the late arrival of precip allowed temps to warm into the mid to upper 30s...and dewpoints has risen into the teens after being in single digits earlier. But Despite what is less than ideal conditions there still was  major ice accumulations across north ga, causing hundreds of thousands of power outages, and a lot of egg on a lot of local mets faces.

 

With this system, **assuming we don't see a gfs like track and timing** we have a much stronger high initially, better arrival time of precip, if it starts as early as the canadian, nam, french, and jma, we will have colder surface temps/wetbulbs at the start of it, and just like the 2000 storm precip will cool down the interior carolinas at the same time as north ga..thus helping to maintain easterly flow and causing the cold pool to be even more stubborn to dislodge or warm up. Again though if things played out with timing and surface low track like the 06z gfs, cooling/damming will be much less.

 

One other thing to note is the gfs dewpoints. For whatever reason, the gfs warms dewpoints into the 20s over north ga/upstate by 12z despite no precip or response in dry air temperature.  No other model is showing such a big rise in dewpoints without precip already starting.  So  that is something those should keep in mind when looking at the gfs as this obviously would mean much less evap cooling potential and would greatly reduce the cooling potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...