Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,617
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    RyRyB
    Newest Member
    RyRyB
    Joined

Feb 15-16 Possible Mixed Event.


lilj4425

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

12z gfs para better than op.  More front end precip, which is has a better chance of being frozen.  Looks like triad area goes over 32 degrees early  Monday evening,  but not until  close to a half an inch of precip has fallen.   A slight shift south and east and a lot of the CAD would stay below 32 for event.  

 

BTW, can someone tell me what differences are in gfs para and op.  I know there was a major upgrade on gfs last year and more recently the gefs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So here's there 12z Model Break down:

 

Models showing a signficant event for CAD regions:

 

1. Para GFS

2. CMC, (switches to rain, but still lays down a significant winter storm on the front end.)

3. Ukie (most likely a big hit, going off the maps we have)

4. Euro Ensemble Control, (major hit)

5. GFS/CMC/ and Euro Ensembles imply a decent threat as well

6. JMA,(I think?)

7. ARPEGE, (major hit)

8. NAM, (I'm guessing here, but it looks pretty flat with the backside energy so I think it would lead to a hit.)

 

Models showing mostly rain with a storm that cuts too far west:

1. Euro Op

2. GFS Op

3.NAVGEM, (it trended way south compared to it's prior runs, but is still too far north and too warm for anything)

4. ??? I guess that's all?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The afternoon WPC probability maps, give us a 50-75% chance of .25 QPF or more , as sleet or snow! That's amazing after the 12z runs!

 

That's because they actually know how to look at climatology instead of just one suite of model runs.

 

This is not over by a long shot all these cliff dives because of one set of models.

 

nezvrl.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And check out 18 z 84 Nam : Do I see a consensus building back up? LOL

 

namconus_ref_frzn_seus_28.png

 

 

12z Para is a crush job... much flatter with the backside wave the operational.

 

It's dropping 2.5 to 3 inches of snow in my backyard before switching over to sleet/freezing rain.

 

It even gives atlanta a solid inch or two of snow Monday morning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12z gfs para better than op.  More front end precip, which is has a better chance of being frozen.  Looks like triad area goes over 32 degrees early  Monday evening,  but not until  close to a half an inch of precip has fallen.   A slight shift south and east and a lot of the CAD would stay below 32 for event.  

 

BTW, can someone tell me what differences are in gfs para and op.  I know there was a major upgrade on gfs last year and more recently the gefs.  

I'm a met and i don't know what it is. I think they tried to decrease raster cell size and that was the experimental model. I thought the old model was done away with and replaced with the parallel. that's just my guess. been a year or two since i messed with those files and GRADS. LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12z gfs para better than op. More front end precip, which is has a better chance of being frozen. Looks like triad area goes over 32 degrees early Monday evening, but not until close to a half an inch of precip has fallen. A slight shift south and east and a lot of the CAD would stay below 32 for event.

BTW, can someone tell me what differences are in gfs para and op. I know there was a major upgrade on gfs last year and more recently the gefs.

the para is the new Gfs which will take over soon. It has slightly better scores than the old Gfs.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12z gfs para better than op. More front end precip, which is has a better chance of being frozen. Looks like triad area goes over 32 degrees early Monday evening, but not until close to a half an inch of precip has fallen. A slight shift south and east and a lot of the CAD would stay below 32 for event.

BTW, can someone tell me what differences are in gfs para and op. I know there was a major upgrade on gfs last year and more recently the gefs.

When the 13km GFS was released last year one of the future improvements they listed was supposed to be higher vertical resolution, but I have no idea if that is a part of this particular release.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a met and i don't know what it is. I think they tried to decrease raster cell size and that was the experimental model. I thought the old model was done away with and replaced with the parallel. that's just my guess. been a year or two since i messed with those files and GRADS. LOL

Your a met? But you called the last set of OP runs a app runner? I'm more than confused! I know....banter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...