WinterWxLuvr Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 EPS is saying west track. No other way to interpret it. lowloc.JPG West of 95, yes. But not west of the Apps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTRWx Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 EPS is saying west track. No other way to interpret it. lowloc.JPG It's a very odd look a this range, wouldn't you agree? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 EPS is saying west track. No other way to interpret it. lowloc.JPG yeah I agree with you. some spread but not horrid for that range. the clusters are definitely closer to the op than otherwise. WV gonna get blasted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herb@MAWS Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 I agree with 98 of this post ... 50% of the time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 West of 95, yes. But not west of the Apps has anyone thought this is going west of the apps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTRWx Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 has anyone thought this is going west of the apps? op euro eta: maybe just east, fine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 has anyone thought this is going west of the apps? Probably not, that's true. I should have said not west of the blue ridge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 op euro well I'm talking thru here. I don't really give a crap what happens north. plus the ens generally favor that track north too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 Looking at the low plots on eps I count 18 that track to our east some pretty Far East. The rest are some variation of cutting over or to our west. That 2/3 have a greater spread but seems due to them really varying on how amped and how far west to cut. Some are nuts. But that 1/3 that are east is a big enough contingent to keep me interested a while longer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warm Nose Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 Bernie R still thinks the Euro is too far west, but seems to be conceding it's a mix event at best for the coastal plain: Video Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Smith Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 I think the outcome will be a weak system tracking about up the I-95 which could lead to freezing rain being a component especially in valleys west of DC. No real phase with the Lakes system until near northern NJ, outcome for DC and BAL likely to be a mixed bag of sleet, freezing rain, cold rain, back to perhaps sleet then snow on the backside, total amounts something like .40 liquid and 0.5 inch snowfalls. Anywhere south of the track likely to see max temps in high 40s to low 50s and a lot of fog, light rain. Well to the north of the track but still in this forum a few might see 1-2 inches of snow at either end with sleet and freezing rain and not much unfrozen precip. At least there is still some chance of a good last minute outcome since weak means no flooding of warmer air into the region and that combined with any shift of track to coast with more intense trend could be the key to 3-5 inches of snow. But that's more likely to be up around ABE-BGM-ALB on this current evolution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTRWx Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 My big question about the eps Lows is why the heck are there so many over NC?! There's a notable second cluster along the NC/SC border. That makes no sense! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 My big question about the eps Lows is why the heck are there so many over NC?! the east lows are almost all weaker. basically the two model camps we've seen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTRWx Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 My big question about the eps Lows is why the heck are there so many over NC?! There's a notable second cluster along the NC/SC border. That makes no sense! Could the other cluster be hinting at another secondary? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurtstack Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 EPS is saying west track. No other way to interpret it. lowloc.JPG to me it looks like the eps is showing two camps - a phased amped cluster and a weak non-phased camp with it leaning toward phased about 60/40. im guessing the non phased weak low members show more snow as they wont have 60mph southerlies lol. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTRWx Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 the east lows are almost all weaker. basically the two model camps we've seen. Generally speaking yea, but then the strongest one on the map is off Hatteras...wth? One western 986 outlier over E KY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 Generally speaking yea, but then the strongest one on the map is off Hatteras...wth? One western 986 outlier over E KY Not sure I see that unless you're referring to the outliers.. there's one strong one way early and one way late in that area. Both seem unlikely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windman18 Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 The NAM looks pretty good. Weak Low, more eastern track. Gives Richmond 6" it looks like. About 3" for dc so far out to 78 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTRWx Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 Not sure I see that unless you're referring to the outliers.. there's one strong one way early and one way late in that area. Both seem unlikely. Indeed, those would be the extreme fringes of the cone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacintoshPro Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 NAM Is a slight cut down on snow totals but that seems rather insignificant as it still keeps the eastern track. I really dislike it at the end of its run.... Upper level temps are above freezing but 95 west is probably being iced over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTRWx Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 I misplaced the comment here, but Bernie's video is a good one. Thanks for whoever shared it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTRWx Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 NAM Is a slight cut down on snow totals but that seems rather insignificant as it still keeps the eastern track. I really dislike it at the end of its run.... Upper level temps are above freezing but 95 west is probably being iced over. It should be a NAMing imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowfan Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 NAM looks warmer, which is why the snow is cut back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTRWx Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 NAM looks warmer, which is why the snow is cut back. but it hangs on into early Tuesday! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cae Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 Yeah I remember that. I think it was like 2 or 3 years ago it seemed the GGEM did OK and everyone was really into it. I barely looked at it at that point but have pretty consistently since and I am having trouble remembering a storm it "won." At any given time, all of models (especially the top 4 globals) give us some useful information. Consider the below quotes from the 12z runs on January 15th. EURO wants nothing to do with the Friday event still.... Well looks like the GGEM still likes some form of a storm for late week. But it's the GGEM. Turns out that we did get a storm the next Friday after all. The NYC debacle last year was another storm that the GGEM arguably "won". It did well throughout the event, and the RGEM did very well, while the Euro struggled. The Euro is usually a better bet than the GGEM, but of course it's not always right. I've noticed that some of the loudest GGEM critics are people who follow weather all year long, and I wonder if this is because the GGEM is a realtively weaker summer model. Here are the NH H500 verification scores for the last couple decades: There's a pretty clear seasonal pattern to the GGEM in recent years. It's close to the GFS in the winter, and not so close in the summer. FWIW, I expect that we'll once again see some blend of solutions, probably similar to the UKMET. I know that's not what everyone wants to hear, but the Euro and UKMET are arguably the two best models, and they've been putting out a pretty strong signal that the GFS and GGEM are too far to the east. But the GFS, GGEM, and UKMET make me suspect the Euro is too far west. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurtstack Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 nam is about 3" and then fzrain then dry. I would take that. No real organized or amped low. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 Yes... this NAM run makes total sense... 6"+ in RIC/S VA... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windman18 Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 Surface temps are almost exactly like 12z, just less qpf. 850's go above freezing for a few hours, but surface stays below nw of 95 which may mean a bit of ice is possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacintoshPro Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 NAM is so Far East it actually cuts down on precipitation a little compared to 12z. We still get 2-4" of absolute concrete though with some sleet and freezing rain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTRWx Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 The NAM is happy hour sweetness! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.