psuhoffman Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 This has become more flawed then a week ago when there was a suggestion of just a bit of ridging into or east of Greenland, just enough to slow the cold retreat. Plus the location of the high was better coming across the U.S. canada border his allowing a system to develop under it. By tracking across barely to our north it must get pushed out before anything can develop. I see that as the bigger issue not timing. On the plus side we will have cold in place ahead and that gives us more wiggle room and models can be off on that from this far out. Plus they are still all over not locked into a solution so I will reserve any judgement on this until they start to converge on something. I still think the warm up after is transient and we get one more reload late feb into March. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Way more than several from what I see, it's more the case of several that are as bad as the Op. It's mostly a speed issue with the bad Euro members, they are much slower and hence the cold air erodes and the system is warmer and or can go more amped flip the causation though. The more amped probably means th trough is digging more so less progressive and thus slower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 12Z euro ensemble mean yesterday gave me 2" for yesterday. Just sayin'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 12Z euro ensemble mean yesterday gave me 2" for yesterday. Just sayin'. the pessimist that I am I look at tools like that as when they look good it's no guaruntee of anything except it's better then them looking bad.ETA: to put it another way, when the ens are awful across the board we are always pretty much screwed. If there is a shot with so many runs between the gefs and eps enough will sniff it out to at least offer the suggestion of hope. When they are good it just means we are still in the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighStakes Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Thanks. That makes perfect sense actually, how you described it (since I'm not looking at the individual members here!). I guess it's good that way more than several might at least give us hope of a decent front end. I think we're all well aware this will be a very imperfect setup and we're almost certainly looking at a changover to rain (or to sleet/ice, then rain). The key is to not end up with as much of a washout after a change, and to maximize the snow if we at all can. And to add...Yoda, that sounds pretty decent (relatively) if that many members are giving 2"+ over the DC area. I believe that is better than 00Z or even yesterday? Maybe I'm too optimistic but I thought a good percentage individual members looked real nice as long as expectations are reasonable. If someone is okay with 3-5 inches and maybe more in the favored areas then this storm looks very possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomeguyfromTakomaPark Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Maybe I'm too optimistic but I thought a good percentage individual members looked real nice as long as expectations are reasonable. If someone is okay with 3-5 inches and maybe more in the favored areas then this storm looks very possible. I'm very ok with that. What does MLSP track look like? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowfan Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Mean for DC is 2.5". 27 members w 2"+. E34 is on crack, but I think it's a good forecast right now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacintoshPro Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 12Z euro ensemble mean yesterday gave me 2" for yesterday. Just sayin'. I know this sounds weeneish, but the ensembles are 100x better in the long range than a day off - they're worse than the op run is within 1-2 days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighStakes Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 I'm very ok with that. What does MLSP track look like? Not a good track but definitely a front end thump to heavy rain. Pretty sure it brings the low right over us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomeguyfromTakomaPark Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Not a good track but definitely a front end thump to heavy rain. Pretty sure it brings the low right over us. Seems to be in reasonably good agreement with the 12z GEFS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Problem with the thump idea from a track west of us, with all the ridging to our northeast I'm not sure how we get any cold resistance to create the waa thump precip. The cold has to resist some to force the warm up and over and create the lift. If the cold is just racing out that thump will be to our west or north where the cold puts up a fight. Otherwise it's pity flakes to driving rain. We probably need a track to our south to get a thump to ice/rain. We could even live with an inside runner but not an apps runner or cutter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 12Z euro ensemble mean yesterday gave me 2" for yesterday. Just sayin'. That's not part of why I think they are better. Flip through the members. We're a day closer and many are holding the wedge look. Yes, most are a flip to rain but I expect that at best anyways. A clean snow this is not unless it's a weak and quick hitter. Some even have a weak but reinforcing HP to our north even though the big cold hp has slipped offshore. Also, the # of members with ok snow to the east of DC has gone up by a little. Combine all this with some excellent posts from the red tags about lower resolution ensemble members (and even ops at range) will be too quick to eat the wedge make this particular run more encouraging than discouraging. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 I will take the 12z para GFS and run please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomeguyfromTakomaPark Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 I will take the 12z para GFS and run please Yeah, it looks like our GLL gets sucked into a Hudson Bay Low instead which is preferable. That track really leaves no room for error though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Yeah, it looks like our GLL gets sucked into a Hudson Bay Low instead which is preferable. That track really leaves no room for error though. Its a semi front end thump through 147 or so... I-81 corridor won't like it though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomeguyfromTakomaPark Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Its a semi front end thump through 147 or so... I-81 corridor won't like it though Low levels could be torched already though by then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Low levels could be torched already though by then. 850s are still SE of us at 150 and 925 are around 0 at 150 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted February 10, 2016 Author Share Posted February 10, 2016 i cleaned up the title Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomeguyfromTakomaPark Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 850s are still SE of us at 150 Of course it's silly to parse details 150 hours on the parallel GFS, but it looks like we lose the surface freezing line around 147 in DC metro. Check the 10m wind maps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Of course it's silly to parse details 150 hours on the parallel GFS, but it looks like we lose the surface freezing line around 147 in DC metro. Check the 10m wind maps. We snow until then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted February 10, 2016 Author Share Posted February 10, 2016 We snow until then where is the Para GFS link again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomeguyfromTakomaPark Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 We snow until then Yeah and like I said it's silly to even worry about details as we all know. It has a good MSLP track for us and I'll leave it at that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomeguyfromTakomaPark Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 where is the Para GFS link again? http://mageval.ncep.noaa.gov/model-guidance-model-parameter.php?group=Model%20Guidance&model=GFS&area=NAMER&ps=area Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joshfsu123 Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 It comes on Tuesday and early enough for the cold air to still be in place for the first part of the storm... could be a great run if the CAD stays intact longer... the GFS para also has the disturbance on Thursday, which slides just to the south of DC through central VA with the 850 line well to the south. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 I counted 20 2"+ and 3 sig snow for DC on 12z. I think further out it includes stuff that's not the storm. Event thru 180 some look like different events than shown on ops/mean. Signal is clearly an elevation event on 12z either way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacintoshPro Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 This is a storm where conflict of interests are clear.... DC and S/E would probably prefer a grazer that gives 2-4" of powder than 4" of slop changing to heavy rain while N/W folks want a big front end thump from a more inland track that would probably be all rain for DC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted February 10, 2016 Author Share Posted February 10, 2016 i was trying to figure out how e34 gave us 35 inches of snow. Its from a storm that follows the PD storm LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 i was trying to figure out how e34 gave us 35 inches of snow. Its from a storm that follows the PD storm LOL Yeah it cuts the first one well west then bombs another that stalls off the Delmarva. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TowsonWeather Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Yeah it cuts the first one well west then bombs another that stalls off the Delmarva. It could happen. Get Ji to start a thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted February 10, 2016 Author Share Posted February 10, 2016 Yeah it cuts the first one well west then bombs another that stalls off the Delmarva. that would make this a pretty good winter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.