Windman18 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Not bad- http://www.instantweathermaps.com/GFS-php/showmap-conussfc.php?run=2016021118&time=PER&var=ASNOWI&hour=105 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 111 -- 998 SLP W NC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 We get some snow but the run is hideous track wise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomeguyfromTakomaPark Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Not bad- http://www.instantweathermaps.com/GFS-php/showmap-conussfc.php?run=2016021118&time=PER&var=ASNOWI&hour=105 Yeah the overrunning precip looks ok but the low is going way west (of the Para GFS which I'm considering the good solution) . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grhqofb5 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Why do we need so many weather models? Are they really of value or just to burn budget dollars? The real goal is to get to 100 models, then assign a weight to each of them based on accuracy, and calculate an average amongst them for each storm and present the result in one "Mega Model." I've already started the process on my own. But its only an experimental Mega Model at this point. I don't just lurk here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted February 11, 2016 Author Share Posted February 11, 2016 0z is where the bigger changes happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacintoshPro Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 overrunning precipitation is a nice 2-4".. but its promptly washed away by heavy rain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Tiny bit more front end but it actually ends up stronger and further west than 12z by Tue morning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Tiny bit more front end but it actually ends up stronger and further west than 12z by Tue morning. I'm rooting for a sub 990 within 50 miles of my house now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deck Pic Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 We get some snow but the run is hideous track wise. Isn't 2-4" kind of a decent over/under for this event? I'd honestly probably lock this run up... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ers-wxman1 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Terrible run Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomeguyfromTakomaPark Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Isn't 2-4" kind of a decent over/under for this event? I'd honestly probably lock this run up... Yeah at least Monday wouldn't suck. Better than the Euro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deck Pic Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Terrible run I think everyone has different success benchmarks.,...3-5" with instant stickage is a pretty good event for me at least Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 0z is where the bigger changes happenTonight, tomorrow night, Saturday night, or Sunday night? I vote all 4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 I'm rooting for a sub 990 within 50 miles of my house now. Getting there. 988 over the bay? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Isn't 2-4" kind of a decent over/under for this event? I'd honestly probably lock this run up... I'd lock this run in a second. Exceeds my 2" bar and a close pass with a sub 990. Snow and wind fetish satisfaction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MN Transplant Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Can't even pretend that the cold air will wedge in. That thing is coming like a freight train and there is no high in sight. A quick-hitter cold air mass is no good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 I think everyone has different success benchmarks.,...3-5" with instant stickage is a pretty good event for me at least This run has 12-18 hours of light precip before the low really does much to us. I'd probably take the under. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ers-wxman1 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 I think everyone has different success benchmarks.,...3-5" with instant stickage is a pretty good event for me at least I don't see how anyone gets 3-5" on the front end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MN Transplant Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 I'd lock this run in a second. Exceeds my 2" bar and a close pass with a sub 990. Snow and wind fetish satisfaction. You'd think that the wind would be better with that kind of low, but there is no high to give us a great pressure gradient. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 I think everyone has different success benchmarks.,...3-5" with instant stickage is a pretty good event for me at leastIt's been that way for as long as they've been keeping winter climate records in these parts. The fact that there's a changeover does not negate a moderate snow event for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 I think everyone has different success benchmarks.,...3-5" with instant stickage is a pretty good event for me at least Yup. By no means is this terrible considering our situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 What a beast. 970's over VT. I'm in on this run. Big storms like this are rare. Could flip back to snow....nah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighStakes Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 I think everyone has different success benchmarks.,...3-5" with instant stickage is a pretty good event for me at leastThat is a good event although the I hate the prospects of a deluge afterwards. A little zr drizzle or light rain would be much better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacintoshPro Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 It's been that way for as long as they've been keeping winter climate records in these parts. The fact that there's a changeover does not negate a moderate snow event for us. but it does make us go to work Tuesday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deck Pic Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 I'm rooting for a sub 990 within 50 miles of my house now. I think the 18z GFS track makes more sense than the euro track, but it's still a goofy track imo...I think the track either goes to our west or further to our east....It's a possible track but not climatologically common...honestly a track to our west might me better as it could throw more moisture our way before the flip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 It's been that way for as long as they've been keeping winter climate records in these parts. The fact that there's a changeover does not negate a moderate snow event for us. I don't even consider Feb 2014 a snowstorm in retrospect. It was fun while it ripped but I'd rank something like Mar 09 ahead of it. If we're looking to pad sure.. I know others in DC think it sucked too, as they said so at the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTRWx Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Terrible run Para is where it's at! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 I don't see how anyone gets 3-5" on the front end.Then you didn't click on the link above someone just posted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deck Pic Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 I don't see how anyone gets 3-5" on the front end. I'm taking the run verbatim... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.